Auditory event-related brain potentials for an early discrimination between normal and pathological brain aging

Neural Regeneration Research

Volumn 8, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 1390-1399

  Dushanova, Juliana ^a   Christov, Mario ^a  

^a BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

Aging; Auditory stimuli; Cognitive process; Electrophysiology; Event related potential; Grants supported paper; Motor task; Neural regeneration; Neuroregeneration; Sensory discrimination; Sensory processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN AGING; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CELL AGING; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

EID: 84889776223     PISSN: 16735374     EISSN: 18767958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.15.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging.1997;12(1):12-21.
2. Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the harold model. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(1):85-100.
3. Rajah MN, D'Esposito M. Region-specific changes in prefrontal function with age: a review of PET and fMRI studies on working and episodic memory. Brain. 2005; 128:1964-1983.
4. Greenwood PM. Functional plasticity in cognitive aging: review and hypothesis. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(6): 657-673.
5. Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P. The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60: 173-196.
6. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Starr A. Long latency event-related components of the auditory evoked potential in dementia. Brain. 1978;101(4):635-648.
7. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Henderson BH, et al. Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978;44(4):447-458.
8. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Roth WT, et al. Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.1980;49:266-276.
9. Morgan CD, Murphy C. Differential effects of active attention and age on event-related potentials to visual and olfactory stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;78(2):190-199.
10. Li L, Gratton C, Fabiani M, et al. Age-related frontoparietal changes during the control of bottom-up and top-down attention: an ERP study. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(2): 477-488.
11. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB. Life-span changes in P3a. Psychophysiology. 2004;41:575-583.
12. Pekkonen E, Huotilainen M, Virtanen J, et al. Age-related functional differences between auditory cortices: a whole-head MEG study. Neuroreport.1995;6(13):1803-1806.
13. Pekkonen E, Jääskeläinen IP, Kaakkola S, et al. Cholinergic modulation of preattentive auditory processing in aging. Neuroimage. 2005;27(2):387-392.
14. D'Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A. Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(11):863-872.
15. Antonova E, Parslow D, Brammer M, et al. Age-related neural activity during allocentric spatial memory. Memory. 2009;17(2):125-143.
16. Eyler LT, Sherzai A, Kaup AR, et al. A review of functional brain imaging correlates of successful cognitive aging. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(2):115-122.
17. Picton, TW, Stuss DT, Champagne SC, et al. The effects of age on human event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 1984;21:312-322.
18. Macpherson H, Pipingas A, Silberstein R. A steady state visually evoked potential investigation of memory and ageing. Brain Cogn. 2009;69:571-579.
19. Barrett G, Neshige R, Shibasaki H. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;66(4):409-419.
20. Anderer P, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B. Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;99(5):458-472.
21. Zhang F, Deshpande A, Benson C, et al. The adaptive pattern of the auditory N1 peak revealed by standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography. Brain Res. 2011;1400:42-52.
22. Anderer P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Semlitsch HV, et al. Differential effects of normal aging on sources of standard N1, target N1 and target P300 auditory event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108(2):160-174.
23. Sanmiguel I, Todd J, Schröger E, Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP. Psychophysiology. 2013;50(4):334-343.
24. Ivry R, Robertson LC. The Two Sides of Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1998.
25. Melara RD, Chen S, Wang H. Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention. Cogn Brain Res. 2005;25:431-442.
26. Lu ZL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures. Science. 1992;258:1668-1670.
27. Wehr M, Zador A. Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex. Neuron. 2005;47: 437-445.
28. Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, Sussman E, et al. 'Primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:283-288.
29. Li L, Gratton C, Fabiani M, Knight RT. Age-related frontoparietal changes during the control of bottom-up and top-down attention: an ERP study. Neurobiol Aging. 2013; 34(2):477-488.
30. Oades RD, Zerbin D, Dittmann-Balcar A. The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test. Int J Neurosci. 1995;81(3-4):249-264.
31. Crowley KE, Colrain IM. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(4):732-744.
32. Iragui VJ, Kutas M, Mitchiner MR, et al. Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task. Psychophysiology. 1993;30(1): 10-22.
33. Amenedo E, Díaz F. Aging-related changes in processing of non-target and target stimuli during an auditory oddball task. Biol Psychol. 1998;48(3):235-267.
34. Amenedo E, Díaz F. Ageing-related changes in the processing of attended and unattended standard stimuli. Neuroreport. 1999;10(11):2383-2388.
35. Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Meier SL, et al. P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: Relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46(5): 1059-1068.
36. Garcia-Larrea L, Lukaszewicz AC, Mauguiere F. Revisiting the oddball paradigm. Non-target vs. neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional effects. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30(8):723-741.
37. Näätänen R, Michie PT. Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol Psychol. 1979;8(2):81-136.
38. Enoki H, Sanada S, Yoshinaga H, et al. The effects of age on the N200 component of the auditory event-related potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1993;1(3):161-167.
39. Alexander JE, Bauer LO, Kuperman S, et al. Hemispheric differences for P300 amplitude from an auditory oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996;21(2-3):189-196.
40. Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr, et al. Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;75(4):255-275.
41. Cooper RJ, Atkinson RJ, Clark RA, et al. Event-related potentials reveal modeling of auditory repetition in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol. in press.
42. Amenedo E, Díaz F. Automatic and effortful processes in auditory memory reflected by event-related potentials. Age-related findings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108(4):361-369.
43. Verleger R, Neukäter W, Kömpf D, et al. On the reasons for the delay of P3 latency in healthy elderly subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;79(6): 488-502.
44. Czigler I, Csibra G, Csontos A. Age and inter-stimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol. 1992;33(2-3): 195-206.
45. Juckel G, Karch S, Kawohl W, et al. Age effects on the P300 potential and the corresponding fMRI BOLD-signal. Neuroimage. 2012;60(4):2027-2034.
46. Hämmerer D, Li SC, Völkle M, et al. A lifespan comparison of the reliability, test-retest stability, and signal-to-noise ratio of event-related potentials assessed during performance monitoring. Psychophysiology. 2013;50(1):111-123.
47. Picton TW. Human auditory evoked potentials. San Diego, USA: Plural Publishing. 2010.
48. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9: 97-113.
49. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48(3):206-208
50. Suner S, Fellows MR, Vargas-Irwin C, et al. Reliability of signals from a chronically implanted, silicon-based electrode array in non-human primate primary motor cortex. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(4): 524-541.
51. Koenig T, Kottlow M, Stein M, et al. Ragu: a free tool for the analysis of EEG and MEG event-related scalp field data using global randomization statistics. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:938925.