Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: A prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study

Gut

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 125-130

  Liu, Xiaodong ^a   Luo, Hui ^a   Zhang, Lin ^a   Leung, Felix W ^b,c   Liu, Zhiguo ^a   Wang, Xiangping ^a   Huang, Rui ^a   Hui, Na ^a   Wu, Kaichun ^a   Fan, Daiming ^a   Pan, Yanglin ^a   Guo, Xuegang ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPIST; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OTTAWA SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE RE EDUCATION; YOUNG ADULT;

COLONOSCOPY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DIET; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889661744     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304292     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Connor A, Tolan D, Hughes S, et al. Consensus guidelines for the safe prescription and administration of oral bowel-cleansing agents. Gut 2012;61:1525-32.
2. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84. (Pubitemid 40349029)
3. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:448-52.
4. Chan WK, Saravanan A, Manikam J, et al. Appointment waiting times and education level influence the quality of bowel preparation in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:86.
5. Lebwohl B, Wang TC, Neugut AI. Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:2014-20.
6. Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:501-6.
7. Parente F, Marino B, Crosta C. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: a practical approach. Dig Liver Dis 2009;41:87-95.
8. Belsey J, Epstein O, Heresbach D. Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25:373-84. (Pubitemid 46184450)
9. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50. (Pubitemid 43381678)
10. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1197-203.
11. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1696-700. (Pubitemid 34761391)
12. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-802.
13. Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ, et al. Optimal preparation-to-colonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75: 583-90.
14. Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Basch CE, et al. Gastroenterologists' perceived barriers to optimal pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation: results of a national survey. J Cancer Educ 2012;27:526-32.
15. Spiegel BM, Talley J, Shekelle P, et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:875-83.
16. van Doorn SC, Dekker E. Colonoscopy quality begins with a clean colon. Endoscopy 2012;44:639-40.
17. Atreja A, Nepal S, Lashner BA. Making the most of currently available bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Cleve Clin J Med 2010;77:317-26.
18. Abuksis G, Mor M, Segal N, et al. A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1786-90.
19. Shaikh AA, Hussain SM, Rahn S, et al. Effect of an educational pamphlet on colon cancer screening: a randomized, prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;22:444-9.
20. Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ, et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:804-11.
21. Calderwood AH, Lai EJ, Fix OK, et al. An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:307-14.
22. Modi C, Depasquale JR, Digiacomo WS, et al. Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparation in outpatient colonoscopies. Qual Prim Care 2009;17:397-404.
23. Chiu HM, Lin JT, Wang HP, et al. The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms - a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2719-25.
24. Church JM. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - timing is the key!. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1223-5. (Pubitemid 28477968)
25. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A, et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6161-6. (Pubitemid 44688165)
26. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:482-6. (Pubitemid 38437086)
27. Park SS, Sinn DH, Kim YH, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1319-26.
28. Chiu HM, Lin JT, Lee YC, et al. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:1570-7.
29. Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P. Same-day bowel cleansing regimen is superior to a split-dose regimen over 2 days for afternoon colonoscopy: results from a large prospective series. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012;46:57-61.
30. Stoop EM, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, et al. Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1051-8.