Tracing contingencies: Analyzing the political in assemblages of web 2.0 cartographies

GeoJournal

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 935-948

  Bittner, Christian ^a   Glasze, Georg ^a   Turk, Cate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Critical cartography; Geoweb; Theory of discourses and hegemonies; Web 2.0 cartography

Indexed keywords

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; CRITICAL RESEARCHES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; GEOWEB; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; THEORETICAL APPROACH; THEORY OF DISCOURSES AND HEGEMONIES; WEB 2.0;

SOCIAL SCIENCES; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

MAPS;

CARTOGRAPHY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH;

EID: 84889631979     PISSN: 03432521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10708-013-9488-8     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Amsterdamska, O. (1990). Book review. Surely you are joking, monsieur latour! science in action, by Bruno Latour. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15(4), 495-504.
2. Aouragh, M. (2011). Palestine online. Transnationalism, the internet and the construction of identity. London: I. B. Tauris.
3. Belliger, A., & Krieger, D. (2006). Einführung in die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. In A. Belliger & D. Krieger (Eds.), Anthology. Ein einführendes Handbuch zur Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie (pp. 13-50). Transcript: Bielefeld.
4. Bittner, C., Michel, B., & Turk, C. Turning the spotlight on the crowd: Examining participatory ethics and practices of crisis mapping. Accepted for print by ACME (forthcoming).
5. Bittner, C., Michel, B., Glasze, G., & Turk, C. (2011). Krisen- und Konflikt-Karten im Web 2. 0. Ein kritischer Blick auf die neuen Krisen und Konfliktkarten. Geographische Rundschau, 63(11), 60-65.
6. Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2006). Frameworks for understanding organizational change-the case of a major ICT outsourcing contract. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 42(1), 1-17.
7. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond. From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
8. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9. Crampton, J. (2008). Cartography: Maps 2. 0. Progress in Human Geography, 33(1), 91-100.
10. Crampton, J. (2010). Mapping. A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Malden: Blackwell.
11. Crawford, C. S. (2005). Actor network theory. In George. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 1-3). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
12. Dalton, C. M. (2012): Mashing-up maps. Google geo services and the geography of ubiquity. Dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill. Department of Geography.
13. Del Casino, V., & Hanna, S. P. (2006). Beyond the 'Binaries': A methodological intervention for interrogating maps as representational practices. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(1), 34-56.
14. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 331-344.
15. Dodge, M., Kitchin, R., & Perkins, C. (2009). Thinking about maps. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & C. Perkins (Eds.), Rethinking maps. New frontiers in cartographic theory (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge.
16. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72(3-4), 173-183.
17. Elwood, S. (2010a). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349-357.
18. Elwood, S. (2010b). Mixed methods: Thinking, doing, and asking in multiple ways. In Dydia. DeLyser (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography (pp. 94-113). Los Angeles, London: Sage.
19. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6-15.
20. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2012) New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1475-5661. 2012. 00543. x.
21. Farman, J. (2010). Mapping the digital empire: Google earth and the process of postmodern cartography. New Media Society,. doi: 10. 1177/1461444809350900.
22. Featherstone, D. (2008). Resistance, space and political identities. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
23. Gartner, G. (2009). Web mapping 2. 0. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & C. Perkins (Eds.), Rethinking maps. New frontiers in cartographic theory (pp. 68-82). London: Routledge.
24. Glasze, G. (2009). Kritische Kartographie. Geographische Zeitschrift, 97(4), 181-191.
25. Graham, M. (2011) Cloud collaboration: Peer-production and the engineering of the internet. In S. Brunn (Ed.), Engineering earth (pp. 67-83). New York: Springer.
26. Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211-221.
27. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey data sets. Environment and Planning B, 37(4), 682-703.
28. Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 55-69.
29. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2. 0: The neogeography of the geoweb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011-2039.
30. Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1-20.
31. Hetherington, K., & Law, J. (2000). After networks. Environment and Planning D, 18(2), 127-132.
32. Hostaker, R. (2005). Latour-semiotics and science studies. Science Studies, 18(2), 5-25.
33. Kitchin, R., Gleeson, J., Dodge, M. (2012) Unfolding mapping practices: A new epistemology for cartography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1475-5661. 2012. 00540. x.
34. Kontopodis, M., & Niewöhner, J. (2010). Das Selbst als Netzwerk. Zum Einsatz von Körpern und Dingen im Alltag. Bielefeld: Transcript.
35. Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London, New York: Verso.
36. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London, New York: Verso.
37. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London, New York: Verso.
38. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation-philosophy, sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
40. Latour, B. (1999). On Recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Laurier, E., & Brown, B. (2008). Rotating maps and readers: Praxiological aspects of alignment and orientation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 201-216.
43. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393.
44. Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-14). Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Law, J. (2007). Actor network theory and material semiotics. John Law's STS web page. http://www. heterogeneities. net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics. pdf. Accessed 07 October 2012.
46. Lee, N., & Brown, S. (1994). Otherness and the actor network: The undiscovered continent. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 772-790.
47. Leszczynski, A. (2012). Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 72-89.
48. Mouzelis, N. (1988). Marxism or post-marxism? New Left Review, 167(1), 107-123.
49. Neis, P., & Zipf, A. (2012). Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project-the case of OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1(2), 146-165.
50. November, V., Camacho-Hubner, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation. Environment and Planning D, 28(4), 581-599.
51. Pickles, J. (1992). Texts, hermeneutics and propaganda maps. In T. J. Barnes & J. Duncan (Eds.), Writing worlds. Discourse, text and metaphor in the representation of landscape (pp. 193-230). London: Routledge.
52. Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.
53. Rehrl K (2010) Geoweb verbindet www und physische Welt. In Rehrl K, Reich S (Eds), Geoweb. (6-17) Heidelberg: dpunkt-Verl.
54. Robinson, A. H. (1952). The look of maps. An examination of cartographic design. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
55. Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters-essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26-56). London: Routledge.
56. Stephens, M. (2012): From geo-social to geo-local: The flows and biases of volunteered geographic information. Dissertation. The University of Arizona, Arizona. School of Geography and Development.
57. Tawil-Souri, H. (2012). Digital occupation: Gaza's high-tech enclosure. Journal of Palestine Studies, 41(2), 27-43.
58. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
59. Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York: Guilford.
60. Wood, D., & Fels, J. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford.
61. Wood, D., & Fels, J. (2008). The natures of maps: Cartographic constructions of the natural world. Cartographica, 43(3), 189-202.