Situating the geoweb in political economy

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 72-89

  Leszczynski, Agnieszka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

geographic information; geoweb; governance; neoliberalism; political economy; the state

Indexed keywords

CAPITALISM; CARTOGRAPHY; GIS; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

EID: 84856103283     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132511411231     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. AtkinsonD (2010) Google maps master plan halted by Ordnance Survey. The Daily Mail24 October. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/article-1323119/Google-maps-master-plan-halted-Ordnance-Survey.html.
2. BallM (2009a) Chinacracks down on mapping and surveying. Spatial Sustain. Available at: http://vector1media.com/spatialsustain/china-cracks-down-on-mapping-and-surveying.html.
3. BallM (2009b) Google's missteps help the geo industry. Spatial Sustain. Available at: http://vector1media.com/spatialsustain/googles-map-missteps-point-to-importance-of-trusted-data.html.
4. Barnett CCulture and Democracy: Media, Space and Representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2003:.
5. BattyP (2009a) Google shakes up the geospatial data industry. Geothought. Available at: http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-shakes-up-geospatial-data.html.
6. BattyP (2009b) Google Maps data correction - a strange semi-update. Geothought. Available at: http://geothought.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-maps-data-correction-strange.html.
7. BBC News (2009) Switzerlandtakes Google to court. BBC News. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8358908.stm.
8. Blamont J.We the people: Consequences of the revolution in the management of space applications.Space Policy. 2008;24:13-21.
9. boz (2010) Costa Rica asks Google to intervene in border dispute. Bloggings by boz. Available at: http://www.bloggingsbyboz.com/2010/11/costa-rica-asks-google-to-intervene-in.html.
10. Bradley T.Google Street View battle highlights privacy challenge.San Francisco Chronicle. 2009; (16 November):.
11. Budhathoki NR,Bruce BC,Nedovic-Budic Z.Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure.GeoJournal. 2008;72:149-160.
12. CapperS (2009) Google faces court action over Street View. Swissinfo. Available at: http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/front/Google_faces_court_action_over_Street_View.html?siteSect=105&sid=11489632&ty=st.
13. CarrA (2010) How Google Maps led to an accidental invasion. Fast Company. Available at: http://www.fastcompany.com/1700270/google-maps-trumps-bing-causes-invasion-in-south-america.
14. Christophers BEnvisioning Media Power: On Captial and Geographies of Television. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2009:.
15. Crampton J.Mapping without a net: Neogeography in the 21st Century. Paper presented as part of the Virtual Seminars in GI Science and Technology, 8 October; 2008a; 2008a.
16. Crampton J.What are the implications of Maps 2.0?.GeoWorld. 2008b;21:14-18.
17. Crampton J.Cartography: Maps 2.0.Progress in Human Geography. 2009;33:91-100.
18. Cooper MLife as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 2007:.
19. Dobson M.Google Maps - the brand. 2009;:.
20. Eckert JUnpublished Masters thesis. Seattle: University of Washington; 2010:.
21. Edney MH. The irony of imperial mapping. The Imperial Map. Ackerman JR, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009:11-45.
22. Elwood S.Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS.GeoJournal. 2008a;72:173-183.
23. Elwood S.Volunteered geographic information: Key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice.GeoJournal. 2008b;72:133-135.
24. Elwood S.Geographic Information Science: New geovisualization technologies - emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research.Progress in Human Geography. 2009;33:256-263.
25. Elwood S,Leszczynski A.Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb.Geoforum. 2010;42:5-16.
26. FeeJ (2010) What Steve Coast's move to Bing really means. James Fee GIS Blog. Available at: http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2010/11/23/what-steve-coasts-move-to-bing-really-means.
27. Flanagin AJ,Metzger MJ.The credibility of volunteered geographic information.GeoJournal. 2008;72:137-148.
28. Foucault M. Truth and power. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Gordon C, ed. New York: Pantheon Books; 1980:109-133.
29. Foucault MThe Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1987-79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:.
30. GeensS (2010) About Costa Rica, Nicaragua, their mutual border, and Google. Ogle Earth. Available at: http://ogleearth.com/?s=About+Costa+Rica%2C+Nicaragua%2C+their+mutual+border%2C+and+Google.
31. Goodchild M.Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography.GeoJournal. 2007;69:211-221.
32. Goodchild M.Citizens as censors: The world of volunteered geography (GeoJournal Plenary Lecture). Paper presented at the 2009 AAG Annual Meeting; 2009Las Vegas; 2009.
33. Gordon E.Mapping digital networks from cyberspace to Google.Information, Communication and Society. 2007;10:885-901.
34. Guptill SC.GIScience, the NSDI, and GeoWikis.Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2007;34:165-166.
35. Haklay M.What's so new about neogeography?. Paper presented as part of the Virtual Seminars in GI Science and Technology, 22 October; 2008; 2008.
36. Haklay M.How good is OpenStreetMap information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets for London and the rest of England.Environment and Planning B. 2010;37:682-703.
37. Haklay M,Singleton A,Parker C.Web mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb.Geography Compass. 2008;2:2011-2039.
38. Hannah MGGovernmentality and Mastery of Territory in Nineteenth-century America. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
39. Haraway DJModestWitness@SecondMillennium.FemaleManMeetsOncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge; 1997:.
40. Harvey DThe Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 1990:.
41. Harvey DA Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
42. Harvey F.Commentary: Just another private-public partnership? Possible constraints on scientific information in virtual map browsers.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2007;34:761-764.
43. JardinX (2005) Using Google Earth to process Katrina flood damage data. Boingboing. Available at: http://www.boingboing.net/2005/08/30/using-google-earth-t.html.
44. JeffriesA (2010) Bing adds Open Street Map. ReadWriteWeb. Available at: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/bing_adds_open_street_map.php.
45. Jessop BState Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1990:.
46. KirkJ (2009) Swiss contend Google doesn't blur Street View enough. PC World13 November. Available at: http://www.pcworld.com/article/182150/swiss_contend_google_doesnt_blur_street_view_enough.html.
47. Larner W.Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality.Studies in Political Economy. 2000;63:5-25.
48. Lee M.A political economic critique of Google Maps and Google Earth.Information, Communication and Society. 2010;13:909-928.
49. Mann GMoney. 2010:.
50. MalikO (2005) Web 2.0, community and the commerce conundrum. Gigaom. Available at: http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/web-20-the-community-the-commerce-conundrum.
51. Miller CC.A beast in the field: The Google Maps mashup as GIS/2.Cartographica. 2006;41:187-199.
52. Mitchell TRule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002:.
53. Navarro VNeoliberalism, Globalization, and Inequalities: Consequences for Health and Quality of Life. Amityville, NY: Baywood; 2007:.
54. NewitzA (2006) Where 2.0 gives the world meaning. Wired16 June. Available at: http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/06/71170.
55. Nourbakhsh I,Sargent R,Wright A,Cramer K,McClendon B,Jones M.Mapping disaster zones.Nature. 2006;439:787-788.
56. O'ReillyT (2005) What is Web 2.0. The O'Reilly Network. Available at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
57. PaulI (2009) Google Street Views faces privacy critics in Japan and Greece. Today @ PC World. Available at: http://www.pcworld.com/article/164810/google_street_views_faces_privacy_critics_in_japan_and_greece.html.
58. Peck J.Geography and public policy: Constructions of neoliberalism.Progress in Human Geography. 2004;28:392-405.
59. Peck J,Tickell A.Neoliberalising space.Antipode. 2002;34:380-404.
60. PetrishenB (2010) Town meeting: Members reject recommended capital projects. The Winchester Star9 November. Available at: http://www.wickedlocal.com/winchester/news/x115985312/TOWN-MEETING-Members-reject-recommended-capital-projects.
61. Pickles JA History of Spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. New York: Routledge; 2004:.
62. PritchardE (2009) Mr. Wells called it Canton, Google calls it Colesville. CantonRep.com26 October. Available at: http://www.cantonrep.com/news/x23524235/Mr-Wells-called-it-Canton-Google-calls-it-Colesville.
63. Read J.A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity.Foucault Studies. 2009;6:25-36.
64. RodriguesJ (2009) Google Street View's headaches around the world. The Guardian29 November. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/29/google-street-view.
65. Rose NSPowers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
66. Rose NSPolitics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
67. Scharl A,Tochtermann KThe Geospatial Web: How Geobrowsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 are Shaping the Network Society. London: Springer; 2007:.
68. Schmidt S.Privacy not protected on Google Street View, MPs told.National Post. 2009; (22 October):.
69. SchutzbergA (2009) Google resets its data providers. All Points Blog. Available at: http://apb.directionsmag.com/archives/6584-Google-Resets-its-Data-Providers.html.
70. Schuurman N.The new Brave New World: Geography, GIS, and the emergence of ubiquitous mapping and data.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2009;27:571-572.
71. Scott JCSeeing Like a State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998:.
72. Shaw R.Google gets data for free, B.C. gets a bill.The Vancouver Sun. 2010; (13 July):.
73. SiddiqueH (2009) Greece's dim view of Street View. The Guardian12 May. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/may/12/google-street-view-greece-privacy.
74. SieglerMG (2009) Google doubles its cartographers as Maps continues to go Wiki-style. TechCrunch. Available at: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/19/google-doubles-its-cartographers-as-maps-continues-to-go-wiki-style.
75. Singh JP. Introduction: Information technologies and the changing scope of global power and governance. Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Rosenau JNSingh JP, ed. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2002:.
76. Sparke M.Political geography: Political geographies of globalization (2) - governance.Progress in Human Geography. 2006;30:357-372.
77. StrattonA (2009) Ordnance Survey maps to go free online. The Guardian17 November. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/17/ordnance-survey-maps-online.
78. Sui DZ.The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2008;32:1-5.
79. Sunder Rajan KBiocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2006:.
80. Tapscott D,Williams ADWikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Portfolio; 2006:.
81. Terranova TNetwork Culture: Politics for the Information Age. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press; 2004:.
82. TimmerJ (2009) EU seeks Street View picture purge. Ars Technica. Available at: http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2010/02/eu-seeks-street-view-picture-purge.ars.
83. Tulloch DD.Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games.GeoJournal. 2008;72:161-171.
84. WilliamsJ (2009) Google Japan fights concerns about Street View. Examiner.com. Available at: http://www.examiner.com/x-16352-Japan-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Google-Japan-fights-concerns-about-Street-View.
85. WongTSK (2009) Google Street View a privacy worry. The Tornoto Star10 October. Available at: http://www.thestar.com/special/article/713806--google-street-view-a-privacy-worry.
86. Yarbrough L,Easson G.Eye of the storm: Google Earth assists Katrina response and recovery.GeoWorld. 2005;18:24-27.
87. ZafraA (2009) Google Street View in Japan faces various complaints. Search Engine Journal. Available at: http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-street-view-in-japanfaces-various-complaints/13048.
88. Zittrain JThe Future of the Internet - And How to Stop It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2008:.
89. Zook MA,Graham M.The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace.Geoforum. 2007;38:1322-1343.