Robust enzymatic saccharification of a Douglas-fir forest harvest residue by SPORL

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 59, Issue , 2013, Pages 393-401

  Leu, Shao Yuan ^a,b   Zhu, J Y ^a   Gleisner, Roland ^a   Sessions, John ^c   Marrs, Gevan ^d  

^a FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Weyerhaeuser NR Company   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Enzymatic hydrolysis saccharification; Forest harvest residue; Pretreatment; Pretreatment severity

Indexed keywords

ENZYMATIC CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC DIGESTIBILITY; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; FILTER PAPER UNITS; FOREST HARVEST; HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; PRE-TREATMENT; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

ALDEHYDES; BIOFUELS; CELLULOSE; DELIGNIFICATION; FURFURAL; LIGNIN; SACCHARIFICATION;

FORESTRY;

BIOFUEL; CELLULOSE; CONIFEROUS TREE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HARVESTING; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; REFINING INDUSTRY; SULFURIC ACID;

ALDEHYDES; CELLULOSE; DELIGNIFICATION; ENZYMOLYSIS; FORESTRY; FUELS; FURFURAL; HARVESTING; LIGNINS; PRETREATMENT; SACCHARIFICATION;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 84889603785     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Perlack R.D., Stokes B.J., Leader Authors, DOE U.S. Billion-Ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry 2011, 227. Oakridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge (TN), Prepared of the US DOE under Contract No.: DE-AC05-00R22725.
2. Kirschbaum M.U.F. To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 24(4-5):297-310.
3. Gan J., Smith C.T. Availability of logging residues and potential for electricity production and carbon displacement in the USA. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30(12):1011-1020.
4. Committee on Economic and Environmental Impacts of Increasing Biofuels Production Renewable fuel standard: potential economic and environmental effects of US biofuel policy 2011, National Academies Press, Washington DC. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13105.
5. Stephen J.D., Mabee W.E., Saddler J.N. Biomass logistics as a determinant of second-generation biofuel facility scale, location, and technology selection. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2010, 4:503-518.
6. Zhu J.Y., Zhuang X.S. Conceptual net energy output for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass through biorefining. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2012, 38(4):583-598.
7. Kim K.H., Tucker M., Nguyen Q. Conversion of bark-rich biomass mixture into fermentable sugar by two-stage dilute acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96(11):1249-1255.
8. Leu S.Y., Zhu J.Y. Substrate-related factors affecting enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses: our recent understanding. Bioenergy Res 2013, 6(2):405-415.
9. 2-ethanol-water treatment: closed mass balances for carbohydrates and sulfur. ChemSusChem 2012, 5(8):1625-1637.
10. Kumar L., Chandra R., Saddler J.N. Influence of steam pretreatment severity on post-treatments used to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108(10):2300-2311.
11. 2-impregnated softwood with time-dependent temperature profile for ethanol production. Biotechnol Prog 2010, 26(4):1054-1060.
12. Pan X.J., Xie D., Yu R., Saddler J.N. The bioconversion of mountain pine beetle killed lodgepole pine to fuel ethanol using the organosolv process. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 101(1):39-48.
13. Zhao Y.L., Wang Y., Zhu J.Y., Ragauskas A., Deng Y.L. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce by alkaline pretreatment at low temperature. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 99(6):1320-1328.
14. Zhu J.Y., Pan X.J., Wang G.S., Gleisner R. Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100(8):2411-2418.
15. Tian S., Luo X.L., Yang X.S., Zhu J.Y. Robust cellulosic ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepolep pine using an adapted strain S. cerevisiae without detoxification. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:8678-8685.
16. Zhu J.Y., Zhu W., OBryan P., Dien B.S., Tian S., Gleisner R., et al. Ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine: preliminary evaluation of mass balance and process energy efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 86(5):1355-1365.
17. Lan T.Q., Gleisner R., Zhu J.Y., Dien B.S., Hector R.E. High titer ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine by simultaneous enzymatic saccharification and combined fermentation. Bioresour Technol 2013, 127:291-297.
18. Wang Z.J., Lan T.Q., Zhu J.Y. Lignosulfonate and elevated pH can enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:9.
19. Lan T.Q., Lou H., Zhu J.Y. Enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses should be conducted at elevated pH 5.2-6.2. BioEnergy Res 2013, 6(2):476-485.
20. Lou H., Zhu J.Y., Lan T.Q., Lai H., Qiu X. pH-induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. ChemSusChem 2013, 6(5):919-927.
21. Zhang C., Zhu J.Y., Gleisner R., Sessions J. Fractionation of forest residues of Douglas-fir for fermentable sugar production by SPORL pretreatment. Bioenergy Res 2012, 5(4):978-988.
22. Luo X., Gleisner R., Tian S., Negron J., Horn E., Pan X.J., et al. Evaluation of mountain beetle infested lodgepole pine for cellulosic ethanol production by SPORL pretreatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010, 49(17):8258-8266.
23. Zhang C., Houtman C.J., Zhu J.Y. Using low temperature to balance enzymatic saccharification and furan formation during SPORL pretreatment of Douglas-fir. AIChE J 2013, [submitted].
24. Chum H.L., Johnson D.K., Black S.K., Overend R.P. Pretreatment-catalyst effects of the combined severity parameter. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1990, 24/25:1-14.
25. Abatzoglou N., Chornet E., Belkacemi K., Overend R.P. Phenomenological kinetics of complex systems: the development of a generalized severity parameter and its application to lignocellulosics fractionation. Chem Eng Sci 1992, 47(5):1109-1122.
26. Zhu W., Houtman C.J., Zhu J.Y., Gleisner R., Chen K.F. Quantitative predictions of bioconversion of aspen by dilute acid and SPORL pretreatments using a unified combined hydrolysis factor (CHF). Process Biochem 2012, 47:785-791.
27. Wang Q.Q., He Z., Zhu Z., Zhang Y.-H.P., Ni Y., Luo X.L., et al. Evaluations of cellulose accessibilities of lignocelluloses by solute exclusion and protein adsorption techniques. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109(2):381-389.
28. Clark T.A., Mackie K.L., Dare P.H., McDonald A.G. Steam explosion of the softwood Pinus radiata with sulphur dioxide addition. II. Process characterization. J Wood Chem Technol 1989, 9(2):135-166.