Fractionation of Forest Residues of Douglas-fir for Fermentable Sugar Production by SPORL Pretreatment

Bioenergy Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 978-988

  Zhang, Chao ^a,b   Zhu, J Y ^b   Gleisner, Roland ^b   Sessions, John ^c  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bark; Enzymatic hydrolysis saccharification; Forest residues; Pretreatment; Size fractionation sieving

Indexed keywords

BARK; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; DOUGLAS FIR; ENZYMATIC DIGESTIBILITY; FERMENTABLE SUGARS; FINE FRACTION; FOREST RESIDUE; LIGNIN CONTENTS; PRE-TREATMENT; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; SIZE FRACTIONATION; WOOD CONTENT;

CARBOHYDRATES; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; FORESTRY; LIGNIN;

WOOD;

BARK; CARBOHYDRATES; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; FORESTRY; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNINS; SACCHARIFICATION; WOOD;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 84868515054     PISSN: 19391234     EISSN: 19391242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-012-9213-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kirschbaum MUF (2003) To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass Bioenerg 24(4-5): 297-310.
2. Gan J, Smith CT (2006) Availability of logging residues and potential for electricity production and carbon displacement in the USA. Biomass Bioenergy 30(12): 1011-1020.
3. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83: 37-46.
4. Zhu JY, Zhuang XS (2012) Conceptual net energy output for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass through biorefining. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(4). doi: 10. 1016/j. pecs. 2012. 03. 007.
5. Koch P (1980) Harvesting energy chips from forest residues-some concepts for the southern pine region. General Technical Report SO-33. USDA Forest Service, Pineville, LA.
6. Whittaker C, Mortimer N, Murphy R, Matthews R (2011) Energy and greenhouse gas balance of the use of forest residues for bioenergy production in the UK. Biomass Bioenergy 35(11): 4581-4594.
7. Eisenbies MH, Vance ED, Aust WM, Seiler JR (2009) Intensive utilization of harvest residues in southern pine plantations: quantities available and implications for nutrient budgets and sustainable site productivity. BioEnerg Res 2: 90-98.
8. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Zalesny RS Jr (2010) Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies and recalcitrance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87: 847-857.
9. David C, Atarhouch T (1987) Utilization of waste cellulose. VIII. Enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce bark by cellulases of Trichoderma viride. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 16: 51-59.
10. Kim KH, Tucker M, Nguyen Q (2005) Conversion of bark-rich biomass mixture into fermentable sugar by two-stage dilute acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 96(11): 1249-1255.
11. Torget R, Himmel ME, Grohmann K (1991) Dilute sulfuric-acid pretreatment of hardwood bark. Bioresour Technol 35(3): 239-246.
12. Harkin JM, Rowe JW (1971) Bark and its possible use. Research Note FPL-091. USDA Forest Service, Madison, WI. pp 1-55.
13. Pan XJ, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2004) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded Douglas fir wood by alkali-oxygen post-treatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113-16: 1103-1114.
14. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R (2009) Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol 100(8): 2411-2418.
15. Zhu JY, Zhu W, OBryan P, Dien BS, Tian S, Gleisner R et al (2010) Ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine: preliminary evaluation of mass balance and process energy efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(5): 1355-1365.
16. Luo X, Gleisner R, Tian S, Negron J, Horn E, Pan XJ et al (2010) Evaluation of mountain beetle infested lodgepole pine for cellulosic ethanol production by SPORL pretreatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(17): 8258-8266.
17. Tian S, Luo XL, Yang XS, Zhu JY (2010) Robust cellulosic ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepolep pine using an adapted strain S. cerevisiae without detoxification. Bioresour Technol 101: 8678-8685.
18. Wood TM, Bhat M (1988) Methods for measuring cellulase activities. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 160, Biomass (Part A, cellulose and hemicellulose). Academic, New York, pp 87-112.
19. Perlack RD, Stokes BJ (2011) DOE. 2011. U. S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oakridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
20. Murphy GE, Pilkerton SJ (2011) Seasonal impacts on bark loss for Douglas-fir and Ponderosa pine harvested on the Pacific Northwest Coast of the USA. Int J For Eng 22(1): 35-41.
21. Hakkila P (1989) Utilization of residual forest biomass. Springer, Berlin.
22. Wang GS, Pan XJ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R (2009) Sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocellulose (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of hardwoods. Biotechnol Prog 25(4): 1086-1093.
23. Robinson J, Keating JD, Boussaid A, Mansfield SD, Saddler JN (2002) The influence of bark on the fermentation of Douglas-fir whitewood pre-hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59(4-5): 443-448.
24. Schowalter TD, Morrell JJ (2002) Nutritional quality of Douglas-fir wood: effect of vertical and horizontal position on nutrient levels. Wood Fiber Sci 34(1): 158-164.