Discovering health-related knowledge in social media using ensembles of heterogeneous features

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1685-1690

  Tuarob, Suppawong ^a   Tucker, Conrad S ^a   Salathe, Marcel ^a   Ram, Nilam ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Machine learning; Social media

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; HETEROGENEOUS FEATURES; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; N-GRAMS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM; SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

HEALTH;

EID: 84889601386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2505515.2505629     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Asuncion, M. Welling, P. Smyth, and Y. W. Teh. On smoothing and inference for topic models. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI '09, pages 27-34, Arlington, Virginia, United States, 2009. AUAI Press.
2. C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2006.
3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993-1022, Mar. 2003.
4. A. Blum and T. Mitchell. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory, COLT' 98, pages 92-100, 1998.
5. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001.
6. C. Caragea, N. McNeese, A. Jaiswal, G. Traylor, H. Kim, P. Mitra, D. Wu, A. Tapia, L. Giles, B. Jansen, et al. Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM2011), 2011.
7. W. W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115-123. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
8. N. Collier and S. Doan. Syndromic classification of twitter messages. CoRR, abs/1110.3094, 2011.
9. S. Deerwester, S. Dumais, G. Furnas, T. Landauer, and R. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6):391-407, 1990.
10. F. Figueiredo, L. Rocha, T. Couto, T. Salles, M. A. Gonålves, and W. M. Jr. Word co-occurrence features for text classification. Information Systems, 36(5):843-858, 2011.
11. T. L. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, D. M. Blei, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Integrating topics and syntax. Advances in neural information processing systems, 17:537-544, 2005.
12. G. H. John and P. Langley. Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. In Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 338-345, San Mateo, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.
13. S. Kataria, P. Mitra, and S. Bhatia. Utilizing context in generative bayesian models for linked corpus. In AAAI, 2010.
14. T. M. Khoshgoftaar, M. Golawala, and J. V. Hulse. An empirical study of learning from imbalanced data using random forest. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence - Volume 02, ICTAI '07, pages 310-317, 2007.
15. K. Kira and L. Rendell. The feature selection problem: Traditional methods and a new algorithm. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 129-129. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1992.
16. L. Lopes, J. Zamite, B. Tavares, F. Couto, F. Silva, and M. Silva. Automated social network epidemic data collector. In INForum informatics symposium. Lisboa, 2009.
17. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schtze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
18. A. Mccallum and K. Nigam. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In AAAI-98 Workshop on 'Learning for Text Categorization', 1998.
19. M. J. Paul and M. Dredze. A model for mining public health topics from twitter. Technical report, 2011.
20. M. J. Paul and M. Dredze. You are what you tweet: Analyzing Twitter for public health. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and and Social Media, pages 265-272, 2011.
21. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 851-860, 2010.
22. A. Silvescu, C. Caragea, and V. Honavar. Combining super-structuring and abstraction on sequence classification. In Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM '09, pages 986-991, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
23. B. Sriram, D. Fuhry, E. Demir, H. Ferhatosmanoglu, and M. Demirbas. Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '10, pages 841-842, 2010.
24. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment in short strength detection informal text. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61(12):2544-2558, Dec. 2010.
25. S. Tuarob, L. C. Pouchard, and C. L. Giles. Automatic tag recommendation for metadata annotation using probabilistic topic modeling. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL '13, 2013.
26. S. Tuarob, L. C. Pouchard, N. Noy, J. S. Horsburgh, and G. Palanisamy. Onemercury: Towards automatic annotation of environmental science metadata. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Science 2012: Tackling Big Data, LISC '12, 2012.
27. S. Tuarob and C. S. Tucker. Fad or here to stay: Predicting product market adoption and longevity using large scale, social media data. In Proc. ASME 2013 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE '13, 2013.
28. S. Zelikovitz and H. Hirsh. Improving short text classification using unlabeled background knowledge to assess document similarity. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1183-1190, 2000.