Are the perspectives really different? Further experimentation on scenario-based reading of requirements

Empirical Software Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 331-356

  Regnell, Björn ^a   Runeson, Per ^a   Thelin, Thomas ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

PERSPECTIVE-BASED READING (PBR); REQUIREMENTS INSPECTION;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 0034476543     PISSN: 13823256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009848320066     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Basili, V. R., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørumgård, S., and Zelkowitz, M. 1996. The Empirial Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading, Empirical Software Engineering, 1(2), 133-164.
2. Basili, V. R., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørungård, S., and Zelkowitz, M. 1998. Lab Package for the Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading. Available at: Http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/ SoftEng/ESEG/manual/pbr_package/manual.html
3. Ciolkowski, M., Differding, C., Laitenberger, O., and Münch, J. 1997. Empirical Investigation of Perspective-Based Reading: A Replicated Experiment, ISERN Report No. 97-13. Available at: Http://www.iese.fhg.de/ ISERN/pub/isern.biblio.tech.html
4. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation - Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin Company.
5. Doolan, E. P. 1992. Experiences with Fagan’s Inspection Method, Software Practice and Experience, 22(2), 173-182.
6. Eick, S. G., Loader, C. R., Long, M. D., Votta, L. G., and Vander Wiel, S. A. 1992. Estimating Software Fault Content Before Coding, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’92), pp. 59-65.
7. Fagan, M. E. 1976. Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development, IBM System Journal, 15(3), 182-211.
8. Fusaro, P., Lanubile, F., and Visaggio, G. 1997. A Replicated Experiment to Assess Requirements Inspection Techniques, Empirical Software Engineering, 2(1), 39-57.
9. Hayes, W. 1999. Research Synthesis in Software Engineering: A Case for Meta-Analysis, Proceedings of the 6th International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’99), Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 143-151.
10. Humphrey, W. S. 1989. Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley.
11. Johnson, P. M., and Tjahjono, D. 1998. Does Every Inspection Really Need a Meeting? Empirical Software Engineering, 3(1), 9-35.
12. Miller, J. 1999. Estimating the Number of Remaining Defects after Inspection, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 9(4), 167-189.
13. Miller, J., Wood, M., and Roper, M. 1998. Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists, Empirical Software Engineering, 3(1), 37-64.
14. Montgomery, D. C. 1997. Design and Analysis of Experiments, Fourth Edition. Wiley.
15. Porter, A., Votta, L., and Basili, V. R. 1995. Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspection: A Replicated Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(6), 563-575.
16. Porter, A., and Votta, L. 1998. Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspection: A Replication Using Professional Subjects, Empirical Software Engineering, 3(4), 355-380.
17. Robson, C. 1993. Real World Research, Blackwell.
18. Sandahl, K., Blomkvist, O., Karlsson, J., Krysander, C., Lindvall, M., and Ohlsson, N. 1998. An Extended Replication of an Experiment for Assessing Methods for Software Requirements, Empirical Software Engineering, 3(4), 381-406.
19. Shull, F. 1998. Developing Techniques for Using Software Documents: A Series of Empirical Studies, PhD Thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland, USA.
20. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill.
21. Sørumgård, S. 1997. Verification of Process Conformance in Empirical Studies of Software Development, PhD Thesis, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
22. Thelin, T., and Runeson, P. 1999. Capture-Recapture Estimations for Perspective-Based Reading - A Simulated Experiment, Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES’99), Oulu, Finland, pp. 182-200.
23. Votta, L. G. 1993. Does Every Inspection Need a Meeting? Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 1993 Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, ACM Software Engineering Notes, 18(5), 107-114.
24. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., and Haumer, P. 1998. Scenarios in System Development: Current Practice, IEEE Software, March/April 1998, pp. 34-45.
25. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A. 2000. Experimentation in Software Engineering - An Introduction, Kluwer.