Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: A survey study with german physicians

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 378-383

  Klack, Lars ^a   Ziefle, Martina ^a   Wilkowska, Wiktoria ^a   Kluge, Johanna ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Medical professionals; Technology acceptance; Telemedicine assessment

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT MONITORING;

CONVENTIONAL METHODS; IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS; MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS; POTENTIAL BARRIERS; PRIVACY PROTECTION; PROFESSIONAL GROUPS; TECHNICAL PROFESSIONALS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

TELEMEDICINE;

ALLOPATHY; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LONG TERM CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; REVIEW; TELEMEDICINE; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84889560164     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S026646231300041X     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. R̈ocker C, Ziefle M. E-Health, assistive technologies and applications for assisted living. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011.
2. Martin AB, Probst JC, Shah K, Chen Z, Garr D. Differences in readiness between rural hospitals and primary care providers for telemedicine adoption and implementation: Findings from a statewide telemedicine survey. J Rural Health. 2012;28:8-15.
3. Whited JD. Economic analysis of telemedicine and the teledermatology paradigm. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16:223-228.
4. Zanaboni P, Wootton R. Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:1.
5. Rao B, Lombardi A Jr. Telemedicine: Current status in developed and developing countries. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8:371-375.
6. Spaulding RJ, Russo T, Cook DJ, Doolittle GC. Diffusion theory and telemedicine adoption by Kansas health-care providers: critical factors in telemedicine adoption for improved patient access. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(Suppl 1):107-109.
7. Gagnon M-P, Duplantie J, Fortin J-P, Jennett P, Scott R. A survey in Alberta and Quebec of the telehealth applications that physicians need. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:352-356.
8. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Sapci H. Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11:296-316.
9. Alag̈oz F, Ziefle M,WilkowskaW, Calero-Valdez A. Openness to accept medical technology-A cultural view. In: Holzinger A, Simonic K-M, eds. Information quality in e-Health. Vol 7058. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011:151-170.
10. Klack L, Schmitz-Rode T,WilkowskaW, et al. Integrated home monitoring and compliance optimization for patients with mechanical circulatory support devices. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:2911-2921.
11. Mennicken S, ZiefleM, Sack O. People and a virtual doctor's visit: Learning about multiple facets of acceptance in a telemedical scenario. In: Workshop user-centered-design of pervasive health applications. IEEE Xplore; 2011.
12. Buck S. Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: A cognitive-emotional approach. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15:55-58.
13. Wilkowska W, Ziefle M. Privacy and data security in E-health: Requirements from users' perspective. Health Informatics J. 2012;18:191-201.
14. Beier G. Locus of control when interacting with technology (Kontroll ̈uberzeugungen imUmgangmit Technik). Psychol Rep. 1999;24:684-693.
15. Ziefle M, R̈ocker C, Holzinger A. Medical technology in smart homes: Exploring the user's perspective on privacy, intimacy and trust. In: Computer software and applications conference workshops. Munich: 2011: 410-415.