Politics

A Companion to Social Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 315-334

  Meskell, Lynn ^a   Preucel, Robert W ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889300600     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470693605.part4     Document Type: Chapter

References (170)

1. Abdi, K. 2001. Nationalism, politics, and the development of archaeology in Iran. American Journal of Archaeology 105: 51-76.
2. Abu el-Haj, N. 1998. Translating truths: Nationalism, the practice of archaeology, and the remaking of past and present in contemporary Jerusalem. American Ethnologist 25: 166-188.
3. Abu el-Haj, N. 2001. Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self Fashioning in Israeli Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Almond, B. 1991. Rights. In P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 259-269.
5. Andah, B. W. 1995a. European encumbrances to the development of relevant theory in African archaeology. In P. J. Ucko (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 96-109.
6. Andah, B. W. 1995b. Studying African societies in cultural context. In P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson (eds.), Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 149-181.
7. Anthony, D. 1995. Nazi and eco-feminist prehistories: Counter points in Indo-European archaeology. In P. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 82-96.
8. Appadurai, A. 1997. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Arnold, B. 1990. The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 64: 464-478.
10. Ashworth, G. 1995. Heritage, tourism and Europe: A European future for a European past? In D. Herbert (ed.), Heritage, Tourism and Society. New York: Mansell, pp. 69-84.
11. Attwood, B., and J. Arnold (eds.) 1992. Power, Knowledge and Aborigines. Bundoora: La Trobe University Press.
12. Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: Making Space. Oxford: Berg.
13. Bernal, I. 1980. A History of Mexican Archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson.
14. Bernbeck, R., and S. Pollock. 1996. Ayodhya, archaeology, and identity. Current Anthropology 37:138-142.
15. Blundell, G. 1996. Presenting South Africa's rock art sites. In J. Deacon (ed.), Monuments and Sites: South Africa, pp. 71-80. Sri Lanka: International Council on Monuments and Sites.
16. Blundell, G. 2002. The Unseen Landscape: A Journey to Game Pass Shelter (Guide Booklet). Johannesburg:Rock Art Research Institute.
17. Bone, J. 2001. Afghan warlord calls for statues to be rebuilt. The Times, London, December 10.
18. Bowdler, S. 1992. Unquiet slumbers: The return of the Kow Swamp burials. Antiquity 66: 103-106.
19. Bray, T. (ed.) 2001. The Future of the Past: Archaeologists, Native Americans and Repatriation. New York: Garland.
20. Bray, T., and T. W. Killion (eds.) 1994. Reckoning with the Dead: The Larsen Bay Repatriation and the Smithsonian Institution. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
21. Brown, K. S. 1998. Contests of heritage and the politics of preservation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 68-86.
22. Byrne, D. 1991. Western hegemony in archaeological heritage management. History and Anthropology 5: 269-276.
23. Byrne, D. 1996. Deep nation: Australia's acquisition of an indigenous past. Aboriginal History 20:82-107.
24. Byrne, D. 2003a. Messages to Manila. Aboriginal History: forthcoming.
25. Byrne, D. 2003b. Nervous landscapes: Race and space in Australia. Journal of Social Archaeology 3:169-193.
26. Byrne, D. , H. Brayshaw, and T. Ireland. 2001. Social Significance: A Discussion Paper. Sydney: New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service.
27. Cantwell, A-M., E. Friedlander, and M. L. Tramm (eds.) 2000. Ethics and Anthropology: Facing Future Issues in Human Biology, Globalism and Cultural Property. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
28. Castañeda, Q. E. 1997. In the Museum of Maya Culture: Touring Chichén Itzá, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Chakrabarti, D. K. 1995. Buddhist sites across South Asia as influenced by political and economic forces. World Archaeology 27: 185-202.
30. Chakrabarti, D. K. 1997. Colonial Indology: Sociopolitics of the Ancient Indian Past. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
31. Chakrabarti, D. K. 2000. Colonial indology and identity. Antiquity 74: 667-671.
32. Chapman, J. 1994. Destruction of a common heritage: The archaeology of war in Croatia, Bosnia and Hercegovina. Antiquity 68: 120-126.
33. Chinchilla Mazariegos, O. 1998. Archaeology and nationalism in Guatemala at the time of independence. Antiquity 72: 376-386.
34. Clark, G. A. 2001. Letter to the editor. Society for American Archaeology: Archaeological Record, March: 3.
35. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. 2003. Dismembering/disremembering the Buddhas: Renderings on the Internet during the Afghan purge of the past. Journal of Social Archaeology 3(1): 75-98.
36. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., and T. J. Ferguson. 2004. Virtue ethics and the practice of history: Native Americans and archaeologists along the San Pedro Valley of Arizona. Journal of Social Archaeology 4: 5-27.
37. Coningham, R., and N. Lewer. 2000a. Archaeology and identity in south Asia - interpretations and consequences. Antiquity 74: 664-667.
38. Coningham, R., and N. Lewer. 2000b. The Vijayan colonization and the archaeology of identity in Sri Lanka. Antiquity 74:707-712.
39. Demoule, J. 1999. Ethnicity, culture and identity: French archaeologists and historians. Antiquity 73: 190-198.
40. Dietler, M. 1994. "Our ancestors the Gauls": Archaeology, ethnic nationalism, and the manipulation of Celtic identity in modern Europe. American Anthropologist 96: 584-605.
41. Dongoske, K. E., M. Aldenderfer, and K. Doehner (eds.) 2000. Working Together: Native American and Archaeologists. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
42. Dongoske, K. E., M. Yeatts, R. Anyon, and T. J. Ferguson. 1997. Archaeological cultures and cultural affiliation: Hopi and Zuni perspectives in the American southwest. American Antiquity 62: 600-608.
43. Dowdall, K., and O. Parish. 2003. A meaningful disturbance of the earth. Journal of Social Archaeology 3: 99-133.
44. Edensor, T. 1998. Tourists at the Taj: Performance and Meaning at a Symbolic Site. New York:Routledge.
45. Elamin, Y. M. 1999. Archaeology and modern Sudanese cultural identity. African Archaeological Review 16: 1-3.
46. Fawcett, C. 1995. Nationalism and postwar Japanese archaeology. In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232-246.
47. Fforde, C., J. Hubert, and P. Turnbull (eds.) 2002. The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
48. Fine-Dare, K. 2002. Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
49. Fleury-Ilett, B. 1993. Identity of France: the archaeological interaction. Journal of European Archaeology 1: 169-180.
50. Fordred Green, L., D. R. Green, and E. G. Neves. 2003. Indigenous knowledge and archeological science: The challenges of public archeology in the Reserva Uaçá. Journal of Social Archaeology 3: 366-398.
51. Fotiadis, M. 1993. Regions of the imagination: archaeologists, local people, and the archaeological record in fieldwork, Greece. Journal of European Archaeology 1: 151-170.
52. Fowler, D. D. 1987. Uses of the past: Archaeology in the service of the state. American Antiquity 52: 229-248.
53. Funari, P. P. A. 1995. Mixed features of archaeological theory in Brazil. In P. J. Ucko (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 236-250.
54. Goldstein, L. (1992). The potential for future relationships between archaeologists and Native Americans. In L. Wandsnider (ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future. Carbondale:Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 59-71.
55. Goldstein, L., and K. Kintigh. 1990. Ethics and the reburial controversy. American Antiquity 55:585-591.
56. Gosden, C. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. London: Routledge.
57. Gosden, C. 2001. In I. Hodder (ed.), Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 241-261.
58. Green, E. L. (ed.) 1984. Ethics and Values in Archaeology. New York: The Free Press.
59. Hall, M. 1984. The burden of tribalism: The social context of southern African Iron Age Studies. American Antiquity 49: 455-467.
60. Hall, M. 1988. Archaeology under apartheid. Archaeology 41: 62-64.
61. Hall, M. 1992. Small things and the mobile, conflictual fusion of power, fear, and desire. In A. Yentsch and M. Beaudry (eds.), The Art and Mystery of Historical Archaeology. Boca Raton:CRC Press, pp. 373-399.
62. Hall, M. 1994a. Lifting the veil of popular history: Archaeology and politics in urban Cape Town. In G. C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds.), Social Construction of the Past. London and New York:Routledge, pp. 176-184.
63. Hall, M. 1994b. The secret lives of houses: Women and gables in the eighteenth-century Cape. Social Dynamics 20: 1-48.
64. Hall, M. 1999. Virtual colonization. Material Culture 4: 39-55.
65. Hall, M. 2000. Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial Transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake. London: Routledge.
66. Hall, M. 2001. Social archaeology and the theaters of memory. Journal of Social Archaeology 1: 50-61.
67. Hamilakis, Y. 1996. Through the looking glass: Nationalism, archaeology and the politics of identity. Antiquity 70: 975-978.
68. Hamilakis, Y. 1999. Stories from exile: Fragments from the cultural biography of the Parthenon (or "Elgin") marbles. World Archaeology: The Cultural Biography of Objects 31: 303-320.
69. Hamilakis, Y., and E. Yalouri. 1996. Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity 70: 117-129.
70. Handwerker, W. P. 1997. Universal human rights and the problem of unbounded cultural meanings. American Anthropologist 99: 799-809.
71. Härke, H. (ed.) 2000. Archaeology, Ideology and Society: The German Experience. Gesellschaften und Staaten im Epochanwandel 7. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
72. Härke, H., and S. Wolfram. 1993. The power of the past. Current Anthropology 34: 182-184.
73. Hemming, S. 2000. Ngarrendjeri burials as cultural sites: Indigenous heritage issues in Australia. World Archaeology Bulletin 11: 58-66.
74. Herbert, D. (ed.) 1995. Heritage, Tourism, and Society. London: Mansell.
75. Higueras, A. 1995. Archaeological research in Peru: Its contribution to national identity and to the Peruvian public. Journal of the Steward Anthropological Society 23: 391-407.
76. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1991. Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. London: Routledge.
77. Hodder, I. 1998. The past and passion and play: Çatalhöyük as a site of conflict in the construction of multiple pasts. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 124-139.
78. Hodder, I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Hodder, I. 2000a. Archaeology and globalism. David Skomp Distinguished Lectures in Anthropology, 1999-2000, Indiana University, February 18.
80. Hodder, I. (ed.) 2000b. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge:McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
81. Hyland, J. 1992. Archaeological meditations of the Conquest and constructions of Mexican national identity. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 73-4: 92-114.
82. Janke, T. 1998. Our Culture: Our Future. Report on Australian Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights. Surrey Hills: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.
83. Jeppson, P. L. 1997. "Leveling the playing field" in the contested territory of the South African past: A "public" versus a "people's" form of historical archaeology outreach. Historical Archaeology 31: 65-83.
84. Jones, L. 1997. Conquests of the imagination: Maya-Mexican polarity and the story of Chichén Itzá. American Anthropologist 99: 275-290.
85. Kasier, T. 1995. Archaeology and ideology in southeastern Europe. In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-119.
86. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 1998. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
87. Kohl, P. L. 1998. Nationalism and archaeology: On the constructions of nations and the reconstructions of the remote past. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 223-246.
88. Kohl, P. L. and C. Fawcett (eds.) 1995. Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
89. Kotsakis, K. 1998. The past is ours: Images of Greek Macedonia. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 44-67.
90. Lahiri, N. 2000. Archaeology and identity in colonial India. Antiquity 74: 687-692.
91. Langford, M. 1983. Our heritage - your playground. Australian Archaeology 16: 1-6.
92. Laue, G., T. Turkington, and B. Smith. 2002. Presenting South African rock art to the world:Two major new public rock art site developments for 2002. The Digging Stick 18: 5-7.
93. Lawler, A. 2003. Impending war stokes battle over fate of Iraqi antiquities. Science 299: 643.
94. Le Fleur, C. A. 2001. Resolutions as agreed by Official and Associate Delegates to the National Khoisan Consultative Conference on Khoisan diversity in National Unity, Anthropology edition, vol. http://www.und.ac.za/und/ccms/anthropology (last accessed April 2003).
95. Lewis-Williams, J. D. 1995. Some aspects of rock art research in the politics of present-day South Africa. In K. Helskog and B. Olsen (eds.), Perceiving Rock Art: Social and Political Perspectives. Oslo: Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, pp. 317-337.
96. Lilley, I. (ed.) 2000a. Native Title and the Transformation of Archaeology in the Postcolonial World. Sydney: University of Sydney, Oceania Monographs 50.
97. Lilley, I. 2000b. Professional attitudes to indigenous interests in the native title era: Settler societies compared. In I. Lilley (ed.), Native Title and the Transformation of Archaeology in the Postcolonial World. Sydney: Oceania Publications, Monograph 50, pp. 99-119.
98. Lilley, I., and M. Williams, 2005 Archaeological and indigenous significance: A view from Australia. In C. Mathers, T. Darvill, and B. Little (eds.), Heritage of Value, Archaeology of Renown: Reshaping Archaeological Assessment and Significance. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
99. Lynott, M. J., and A. Wylie (eds.) 2000. Ethics in American Archaeology. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
100. Mamani Condori, C. 1996. History and prehistory in Bolivia: What about the Indians? In R. W. Preucel and I. Hodder (eds.), Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 632-645.
101. Mandal, D. 1993. Ayodhya: Archaeology After Demolition. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
102. Matero, F. 2000. Ethics and policy in conservation. Conservation: The GCI Newsletter 15: 5-9.
103. McGuire, R. H. 1992. Archaeology and the first Americans. American Anthropologist 94: 816-836.
104. McGuire, R. H., and R. Navarrete. 1999. Entre motocicletas y fusiles: Las arqueologías radicales anglosajona y latinoamericana. Boletín de Antropología Americana 34: 89-110.
105. Meehan, B. 1995. Aboriginal views on the management of rock art sites in Australia. In K. Helskog and B. Olsen (eds.), Perceiving Rock Art: Social and Political Perspectives. Oslo: Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, pp. 295-316.
106. Meskell, L. M. 1998a. Archaeology matters. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire:Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 1-12.
107. Meskell, L. M. (ed.) 1998b. Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge.
108. Meskell, L. M. 2001. The practice and politics of archaeology in Egypt. In A.-M. Cantwell, E. Friedlander, and M. L. Tram (eds.), Ethics and Anthropology: Facing Future Issues in Human Biology, Globalism, and Cultural Property. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 146-169.
109. Meskell, L. M. 2002a. The intersection of identity and politics in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 279-301.
110. Meskell, L. M. 2002b. Negative heritage and past mastering in archaeology. Anthropological Quarterly 75:557-574.
111. Meskell, L. M. 2005 Sites of violence: Terrorism, tourism and heritage in the archaeological present. In L. M. Meskell and P. Pels (eds.), Embedding Ethics. Oxford: Berg, forthcoming.
112. Meskell, L. M., and P. Pels (eds.) 2005 Embedding Ethics. Oxford: Berg, forthcoming.
113. Morris, C. 1997. Indigenous intellectual property rights: The responsibilities of maintaining the oldest continuous culture in the world. Indigenous Law Bulletin 19: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ILB/1997/19.html (last consulted April 2003).
114. Moser, S. 1995. Archaeology and its Disciplinary Culture: The Professionalisation of Australian Prehistoric Archaeology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sydney.
115. Murray, T. 1996. Coming to terms with the living: Some aspects of repatriation for the archaeologist. Antiquity 70: 217-220.
116. Murray, T. 2000. Conjectural histories: Some archaeological and historical consequences of indigenous dispossession in Australia. In I. Lilley (ed.), Native Title and the Transformation of Archaeology in the Postcolonial World, pp. 64-77. Sydney: University of Sydney, Oceania Monographs 50.
117. Naccache, A. F. H. 1998. Beirut's memoryside: Hear no evil, see no evil. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, pp. 140-158.
118. Özdogan, M. 1998. Ideology and archaeology in Turkey. In L. M. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London:Routledge, pp. 111-123.
119. Paddayya, K. 1995. Theoretical perspectives in Indian archaeology. In P. J. Ucko (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 110-149.
120. Pai, H. 2000. Constructing "Korean" Origins: A Critical Review of Archaeology, Historiography, and Racial Myth in Korean State-Formation Theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center/Harvard University Press.
121. Pardoe, C. 1990. Sharing the past: Aboriginal influence on archaeological practice, a case study from New South Wales. Aboriginal History 14: 208-223.
122. Patterson, T. C. 1994. Toward a Social History of Archaeology in the United States, New York:Harcourt Brace.
123. Patterson, T. C. 1995. Archaeology, history, Indigenismo, and the state in Peru and Mexico. In P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson (eds.), Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 69-85.
124. Patterson, T. C. 1999. The political economy of archaeology in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 155-174.
125. Pokotylo, D., and N. Guppy. 1999. Public opinion and archaeological heritage: Views from outside the profession. American Antiquity 64: 400-416.
126. Politis, G. 1995. The socio-politics of the development of archaeology in Hispanic South America. In P. J. Ucko (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 197-235.
127. Politis, G. 2001. On archaeological praxis, gender bias and indigenous peoples in South America. Journal of Social Archaeology 1: 90-107.
128. Pollock, S., and C. Lutz. 1994. Archaeology deployed for the Gulf War. Critique of Anthropology 14: 263-284.
129. Preucel, R. W. (ed.) 2002. Archaeologies of the Pueblo Revolt: Identity, Meaning and Renewal in the Pueblo World. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
130. Prott, L., M. de la Torre, and D. Levin. 2001. A conversation with Lyndel Prott. Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter 16: 12-15.
131. Ramos, A. 1994. From Eden to limbo: The construction of indigenism in Brazi. In G. C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds.), Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. London: Routledge, pp. 74-88.
132. Rao, N. 1994. Interpreting silences: Symbol and history in the case of Ram Janmabhoomi/Babri Masjid. In G. C. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds.), Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. London: Routledge, pp. 154-164.
133. Reid, D. M. 2002. Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums, And Egyptian National Identity From Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley: University of California Press.
134. Ridington, R., and D. Hastings. 1997. Blessing for a Long Time: The Sacred Pole of the Omaha Tribe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
135. Scham, S. A. 1998. Mediating nationalism and archaeology: A matter of trust? American Anthropologist 100: 301-308.
136. Schmidt, P. R., and T. C. Patterson (eds.) 1995. Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
137. Schnapp, A. 1996. French archaeology: Between national identity and cultural identity. In M. Díaz-Andreu and T. Champion (eds.), Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. London:University College London Press, pp. 48-67.
138. Schrire, C. 1995. Digging Through Darkness: Chronicles of an Archaeologist. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
139. Shaw, J. 2000. Ayodhya's sacred landscape: Ritual memory, politics and archaeological "fact." Antiquity 74: 693-700.
140. Shepherd, N. 2002. The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:189-209.
141. Shepherd, N. 2003. "When the hand that holds the trowel is black... "; disciplinary practices of selfrepresentation and the issue of "native" labour in archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 3:334-352.
142. Shnirelman, V. A. 1995. Alternative prehistory. Journal of European Archaeology 3: 1-20.
143. Silberman, N. A. 1995. Promised lands and chosen peoples: The politics and poetics of archaeological narrative. In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249-262.
144. Skotnes, P. (ed.) 1996. Miscast: Negotiating the Presence of the Bushmen. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
145. Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies. London: Zed Books.
146. Spriggs, M. 1991. Facing the nation: Hawaiians and archaeologists in an era of sovereignty. The Contemporary Pacific 3: 379-392.
147. Stoffle, R. W., M. N. Zedeno, and D. B. Halmo (eds.) 2001. American Indians and the Nevada Test Site: A Model of Research and Consultation. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
148. Swidler, N., K. E. Dongoske, R. Anyon, and A. S. Downer (eds.) 1997. Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
149. Thomas, D. H. 2000. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. New York: Basic Books.
150. Tong, E. 1995. Thirty years of Chinese archaeology (1949-1979). In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-197.
151. Trigger, B. G. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Tsude, H. 1995. Archaeological theory in Japan. In P. J. Ucko (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 298-311.
153. Tweedie, A. M. 2002. Drawing Back Culture: The Makah Struggle for Repatriation. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
154. Ucko, P. J. (ed.) 1995. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge.
155. UNESCO. 2000. Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage (Paris 16 November 1972). US/ICOMOS Scientific Journal - International Cultural Heritage Conventions 2: 19-36.
156. van Dommelen, P. 1997. Colonial constructs: colonialism and archaeology in the Mediterranean. World Archaeology 28: 305-323.
157. Vargas Arenas, I. 1995. The perception of history and archaeology in Latin America: A theoretical approach. In P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson (eds.), Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 47-67.
158. Vitelli, K. D. (ed.) 1996. Archaeological Ethics. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
159. Von Falkenhausen, L. 1995. The regionalist paradigm in Chinese archaeology. In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198-217.
160. Wailes, B., and A. L. Zoll. 1995. Civilization, barbarism and nationalism in European archaeology. In P. L. Kohl and C. Fawcett (eds.), Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-38.
161. Warren, K. J. 1999. A philosophical perspective on the ethics and resolution of cultural property issues. In P. M. Messenger (ed.), The Ethics of Collecting Cultural Property. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 1-25.
162. Watkins, J. 2001. Indigenous Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
163. Watkins, J. 2004. Becoming American or becoming Indian? NAGPRA, Kennewick, and cultural affiliation. Journal of Social Archaeology 4: 60-80.
164. Wilk, R., and K. A. Pyburn. 1998. Archaeological ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics 1: 197-207.
165. Wilkie, L. A. 2000. Culture bought: Evidence of creolization in the consumer goods of an enslaved Bahamian family. Historical Archaeology 34: 10-26.
166. Wilkie, L. A. 2003. An Archaeology of Mothering. London: Routledge.
167. Wood, M. 1998. The use of the Pharaonic past in modern Egyptian nationalism. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 35: 179-196.
168. Wylie, A. 2001. Ethical dilemmas in archaeological practice: Looting, repatriation, stewardship, and the (trans)formation of disciplinary identity. In M. Lynott and A. Wylie (eds.), Ethics in American Archaeology. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology, pp. 138-68.
169. Yalouri, E. 2001. The Parthenon: Global Fame, Local Claim. Oxford: Berg.
170. Zimmerman, L. J., K. D. Vitelli, J. Hollowell-Zimmer, and R. D. Maurer (eds.) 2003. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.