Age and abdominal wall strength: Assessing the aging abdominal wall after autologous breast reconstruction

Microsurgery

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-23

  Nelson, Jonas A ^a   Fosnot, Joshua ^a   Selber, Jesse C ^b   Wu, Liza C ^a   Serletti, Joseph M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL MUSCULATURE; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; SCORING SYSTEM;

ABDOMINAL WALL; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FREE TISSUE FLAPS; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORATOR FLAP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUS ABDOMINIS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 84872687478     PISSN: 07381085     EISSN: 10982752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/micr.21984     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2010.
2. Alemayehu B, Warner KE,. The lifetime distribution of health care costs. Health Serv Res 2004; 39: 627-642.
3. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML,. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 117-128.
4. Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer LA,. Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 237-243.
5. Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW, Robb GL, Chang DW,. Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: An analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1993-2000.
6. Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, Deapen D, Salem B, Lakhani I, Katz SJ,. Correlates of breast reconstruction: Results from a population-based study. Cancer 2005; 104: 2340-2346.
7. Fernandez-Delgado J, Lopez-Pedraza MJ, Blasco JA, Andradas-Aragones E, Sanchez-Mendez JI, Sordo-Miralles G, Reza MM,. Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1430-1434.
8. Selber JC, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Kovach S, Wu L, Serletti JM,. Free flap breast reconstruction in advanced age: Is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1015-1022.
9. Lipa JE, Youssef AA, Kuerer HM, Robb GL, Chang DW,. Breast reconstruction in older women: Advantages of autogenous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1110-1121.
10. Bowman CC, Lennox PA, Clugston PA, Courtemanche DJ,. Breast reconstruction in older women: Should age be an exclusion criterion? Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 16-22.
11. Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM,. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall. II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1438-1453.
12. Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM,. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall. I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1142-1153.
13. Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, Kuhn LE, Davis J, Wilkins EG,. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 1019-1028.
14. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW,. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: One-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1014-1025; discussion 1026-1017.
15. Nelson JA, Guo Y, Sonnad SS, Low DW, Kovach SJ III, Wu LC, Serletti JM,. A Comparison between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps in breast reconstruction: A single surgeon's recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1428-1435.
16. Walton L, Ommen K, Audisio RA,. Breast reconstruction in elderly women breast cancer: A review. Cancer Treat Rev 2011; 37: 353-357.
17. De Lorenzi F, Rietjens M, Soresina M, Rossetto F, Bosco R, Vento AR, Monti S, Petit JY,. Immediate breast reconstruction in the elderly: Can it be considered an integral step of breast cancer treatment? The experience of the European Institute of Oncology, Milan. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 511-515.
18. Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Waisman E, Waisman JR,. Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 1118-1122; discussion 1123-1115.
19. Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, Mustoe TA, Winchester DP,. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: A National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192: 1-8.
20. Paulson RL, Chang FC, Helmer SD,. Kansas surgeons' attitudes toward immediate breast reconstruction: A statewide survey. Am J Surg 1994; 168: 543-546.
21. August DA, Wilkins E, Rea T,. Breast reconstruction in older women. Surgery 1994; 115: 663-668.
22. Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH,. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: Experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 86-95.
23. Wu LC, Bajaj A, Chang DW, Chevray PM,. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 702-709.
24. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW,. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 737-746; discussion 747-750.
25. Schaverien MV, Perks AG, McCulley SJ,. Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60: 1219-1224.
26. Kind GM, Rademaker AW, Mustoe TA,. Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: A functional outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 417-428.
27. Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL,. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 578-583.
28. Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R, Boeckx WD, Matton G,. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 322-330.
29. Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S, Kinnunen J, Sainio P, Alaranta H,. Abdominal wall competence after free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap harvest: A prospective study. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39: 229-234.
30. Yan XQ, Yang HY, Zhao YM, You L, Xu J,. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction: Experience with 43 flaps. Chin Med J (Engl) 2007; 120: 380-384.
31. Kassmann C, Peek A, Luxenhofer F, Scheufler O, Exner K,. [Myosonographic evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle function after DIEP flap breast reconstruction]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2002; 34: 386-394.
32. Selber JC, Samra F, Bristol M, Sonnad SS, Vega S, Wu L, Serletti JM,. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: Is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function? Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 348-355.
33. Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN,. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 91-101.
34. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B,. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 436-444; discussion 445-436.
35. Bottero L, Lefaucheur JP, Fadhul S, Raulo Y, Collins ED, Lantieri L,. Electromyographic assessment of rectus abdominis muscle function after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 156-161.
36. Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M,. Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: A prospective and objective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1508-1516.
37. Girotto JA, Schreiber J, Nahabedian MY,. Breast reconstruction in the elderly: Preserving excellent quality of life. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 572-578.