Patterns of noncompliance in adolescent field-based accelerometer research

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1181-1185

  Belton, Sarahjane ^a   O'Brien, Wesley ^a   Wickel, Eric E ^b   Issartel, Johann ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Day period; Physical activity; Strategies

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRELAND; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REMINDER SYSTEM; RURAL POPULATION; SCHOOL; STUDENT; TIME;

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COHORT STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRELAND; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REMINDER SYSTEMS; RURAL POPULATION; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84889018879     PISSN: 15433080     EISSN: 15435476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.10.8.1181     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson B. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S544-S554. PubMed doi:10.1249/01. mss.0000185674.09066.8a
2. Sirard JR, Slater ME. Compliance with wearing physical activity accelerometers in high school students. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:S148-S155. PubMed
3. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Ekelund U, et al. Features of the metabolic syndrome are associated with objectively measured physical activity and fitness in Danish children: the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2141-2148. PubMed doi:10.2337/diacare. 27.9.2141
4. Brage S, Wedderkopp N, Ekelund U, et al. Objectively measured physical activity correlates with indices of insulin resistance in Danish children. The European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). Int J Obes. 2004;28:1503-1508. PubMed doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802772
5. Ekelund U, Yngve A, Brage S, Westerterp K, Sjöström M. Body movement and physical activity energy expenditure in children and adolescents: how to adjust for differences in body size and age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:851-856. PubMed
6. Riddoch CJ, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, et al. Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr.-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:86-92. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000106174.43932.92
7. Treuth MS, Sherwood NE, Butte NF, et al. Validity and reliability of activity measures in African-American girls for GEMS. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:532-539. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000053702.03884.3F
8. Treuth MS, Sherwood NE, Baranowski T, et al. Physical activity self-report and accelerometry measures from the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies. Prev Med. 2004;38:S43-S49. PubMed doi:10.1016/j. ypmed.2003.01.001
9. Mota RJ, Valente M, Aires L, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC. Accelerometer cut-points and youth physical activity prevalence. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2007;13:287-299. doi:10.1177/1356336X07081795
10. Bringolf-Isler B, Grize L, Mäder U, Ruch N, Seenhauser FH, Braun-Fahrländer C. Assessment of intensity, prevalence and duration of everyday activities in Swiss school children: a cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer and diary data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:50-60. PubMed doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-50
11. Janz KF, Levy SM, Burns TL, Torner JC, Willing MC, Warren JJ. Fatness, physical activity, and television viewing in children during the adiposity rebound period: The Iowa Bone Development Study. Prev Med. 2002;35:563-571. PubMed doi:10.1006/pmed.2002.1113
12. Rowlands AV, Pilgrim EL, Eston RG. Patterns of habitual activity across weekdays and weekend days in 9-11-yearold children. Prev Med. 2008;46:317-324. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.004
13. Troiano RP, Berrigan DF, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181-188. PubMed
14. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer- based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S531-S543. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98
15. Rowlands AV. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. Ped Exc Sci. 2007;19:252-266. PubMed
16. John D, Sasaki JE, Freedson PS. Comparison of Activity Counts from the Actigraph GT3X and GT1M. International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health (ICPAPH), May 5, 2010.
17. Puyau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Butte NF. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. Obes Res. 2002;10:150-157. PubMed doi:10.1038/oby.2002.24
18. Trost SG, Way R, Okely AD. Predictive validity of three ActiGraph energy expenditure equations for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:380-387. PubMed doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000183848.25845.e0
19. Esliger DW, Copeland JL, Barnes JD, Tremblay MS. Standardizing and optimizing the use of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity monitoring. J Phys Act Health. 2005;3:366-383.
20. Ness AR, Leary SD, Mattocks C. Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in a large cohort of children. Phys Act and Child Obes. 2007;4:476-483. PubMed
21. Van Coevering P, Harnack L, Schmitz K, Fulton JE, Galuska A, Gao S. Feasibility of using accelerometers to measure physical activity in young adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:867-871. PubMed doi:10.1249/01. MSS.0000162694.66799.FE
22. Sirard JR, Kubik MY, Fulkerson JA, Arcan C. Objectively measured physical activity in urban alternative high school students. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:2088-2095. PubMed doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318182092b