Diurnal habitat segregation by tadpoles in two temporary ponds in an Atlantic Rainforest remnant, Northeastern Brazil

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 723, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 181-194

  de Andrade, Edson Victor Euclides ^a   Palhas, Ivo Jael Lourenço ^b   de Moura, Geraldo Jorge Barbosa ^c  

^a Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis   (Brazil)

^b CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amphibia; Anura; Community structure; Larvae; Resource partitioning; Spatial distribution

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CORRELATION; DATA SET; DIURNAL VARIATION; HABITAT TYPE; HETEROGENEITY; LARVA; NICHE PARTITIONING; POND; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RAINFOREST; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BRAZIL;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA;

EID: 84888828014     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-013-1645-z     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andrade-Lima, D., 1957. Estudo fitogeográfico de Pernambuco. Instituto de Pesquisas Agronômicas de Pernambuco, Recife.
2. Andrade, G. V., Eterovick, P. C., Rossa-Feres, D. C., Schiesari, L., 2007. Estudos sobre girinos no Brasil: histórico, conhecimento atual e perspectivas. In: Nascimento, L. B., Oliveira, M. E., (eds), Herpetologia no Brasil II. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, Belo Horizonte: 127-145.
3. Bertolucci, J. & M. T. Rodrigues, 2002. Utilização de habitats reprodutivos e micro-habitats de vocalização em uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) da Mata Atlântica do sudeste do Brasil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 42: 287-297.
4. Bodenheimer, F. S., 1995. Problems of Animal Ecology. The University of Oxford, Oxford.
5. Boulinier, T., J. D. Nichols, J. R. Sauer, J. E. Hines & K. H. Pollock, 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79: 1018-1028.
6. Caldwell, J. P., 1987. Demography and life history of two species of chorus frogs (Anura: Hylidae) in South Carolina. Copeia 1987: 114-127.
7. Carvalho, C. L. B., E. M. Santos & L. A. M. Silva, 1998. Lista atualizada dos anfíbios anuros da Estação Ecológica do Tapacurá. Revista Ômega-UFRPE (Série Biológica) 05: 29-34.
8. Colli, G. R.; Accacio, G. M.; Antonini, Y.; Constantino, R.; Franceschinelli, E. V.; Laps, R. R.; Scariot, A.; Vieira, M. V.; Wiederhecker, H. C., 2003a. A fragmentação dos ecossistemas e a biodiversidade brasileira: Uma síntese. In Rambaldi, D. M. & D. A. S. Oliveira (eds), Fragmentação de ecossistemas: Causas, efeitos sobre a biodiversidade e recomendações de políticas públicas. Ministério do Meio Ambiente/Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Brasília: 317-324.
9. Colwell, R. K., 2005. Estimates: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7. 5. User's Guide and application published at: http://purl. oclc. org/estimates.
10. Dajoz, R., 1983. Ecologia Geral. Ed. Vozes, São Paulo.
11. Diaz-Paniagua, C., 1987. Tadpole distribution in relation to vegetal heterogeneity in temporary ponds. Herpetological Journal 1: 167-169.
12. Diaz-Paniagua, C., 1988. Temporal segregation in larval amphibian communities in temporary ponds at a locality in SW Spain. Amphibia-Reptilia 09: 15-26.
13. Duellman, W. E. & L. Trueb, 1986. Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
14. Eterovick, P. C. & I. M. Barata, 2006. Distribution of tadpoles within and among brazilian streams: the influence of predators, habitat size and heterogeneity. Herpetologica 62: 365-377.
15. Feisinger, P., E. E. Spers & R. W. Poole, 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27-32.
16. Haddad, C. F. B, 1991. Ecologia reprodutivas de comunidade de anfíbios anuros na Serra do Japi, Sudeste do Brasil. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. p. 154.
17. Hero, J. M., 1990. An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in the Central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Amazoniana 11: 201-262.
18. Heyer, W. R., 1974. Niche measurements of frog larvae from a seasonal tropical location in Thailand. Ecology 55: 651-656.
19. Heyer, W. R., R. W. McDiarmid & D. L. Weigmann, 1975. Tadpoles, predation and pond habitats in tropics. Biotropica 7: 100-111.
20. Hurlbert, S. H., 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59: 67-77.
21. Hutchingson, G. E., 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22: 415-427.
22. Inger, R. F., H. K. Voris & K. J. Frogner, 1986. Organization of a community of tadpoles in rain forest streams in Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2: 193-205.
23. Lawler, S. P. & P. J. Morin, 1993. Temporal overlap, competition, and priority effects in larval anurans. Ecology 74: 174-182.
24. Lawlor, L. R., 1980. Overlap, similarity, and competition coefficients. Ecology 61: 245-251.
25. Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in changing environments, some theoretical explorations. Monographs in Population Biology. 2: 1-120.
26. Magurran, A. E., 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Ed. Croom Helm, New South Wales: 179.
27. Mcdiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig, 1999. Research. In Mcdiarmid, R. W. & R. Altig (eds), Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 7-23.
28. Nicieza, A. G., 2000. Interacting effects of predation risk and food availability on larval anuran behaviour and development. Oecologia 123: 497-505.
29. Pianka, E. R., 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 53-74.
30. Purrenhage, J. P. & M. D. Boone, 2009. Amphibian community response to variation in habitat structure and competitor density. Herpetologica 65: 14-30.
31. Rossa-Feres, D. C. & J. Jim, 1994. Distribuição sazonal em comunidades de anfíbios anuros na região de Botucatu, São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 54: 323-334.
32. Rossa-Feres, D. C. & J. Jim, 1996. Distribuição espacial em comunidades de girinos na região de Botucatu São Paulo (Amphibia, Anura). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 56: 309-316.
33. Rossa-Feres, D. C., J. Jim & M. G. Fonseca, 2004. Diets of tadpoles from a temporary pond in southeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21: 745-754.
34. Santos, E. M. & F. O. Amorim, 2006. Cuidado parental em Leptodactylus natalensis (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 96: 461-497.
35. Smith, E. P., 1982. Niche breadth, resource availability and inference. Ecology 63: 1675-1681.
36. Toft, C. A., 1985. Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia 1985: 1-21.
37. Ultsch, G. R., Bradford, D. F., Freda, J., 1999. Physiology. In Mcdiarmid, R. W., R. Altig (eds) Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 189-214.
38. Wells, K. D., 2007. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. The university of Chicago press, Chicago.
39. Wilbur, H. M., 1997. Experimental ecology of food webs: complex systems in temporary ponds. Ecology 78: 2279-2302.
40. Wilbur, H. M., 1972. Competition, predation and the structure of the Ambystomma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53: 3-21.
41. Wilbur, H. M. & J. P. Collins, 1973. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Sci. 182: 1305-1314.
42. Wild, E. R., 1996. Natural history and resource use of four amazonian tadpole assemblages. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History 176: 1-59.
43. Zimmerman, B. L. & D. Simberloff, 1996. An historical interpretation of habitat use by frogs in a Central Amazonian forest. Journal of Biogeography 23: 27-46.