Constraints on the adult-offspring size relationship in protists

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3537-3544

  Caval Holme, Franklin ^a   Payne, Jonathan ^a   Skotheim, Jan M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foraminifera; Fusulinid; Offspring size; Proloculus; Protist; Reproductive strategy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY SIZE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; FECUNDITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTIST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; FORAMINIFERA; FUSULINIDA; PROTISTA;

ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; FORAMINIFER; FUSULINID; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; OFFSPRING SIZE; PROLOCULUS; PROTIST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

FORAMINIFERA; FUSULINID; OFFSPRING SIZE; PROLOCULUS; PROTIST; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FORAMINIFERA;

EID: 84888824416     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12210     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Armstrong, H. A., and M. D. Brasier . 2004. Foraminifera, in microfossils. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. doi: 10.1002/9781118685440.ch15
2. Berrigan, D. 1991. The allometry of egg size and number in insects. Oikos 60:13-32.
3. Blueweiss, L., H. Fox, V. Kudzma, D. Nakashima, R. Peters, and S. Sams . 1978. Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 372:257-272.
4. BouDagher-Fadel, M. 2008. Evolution and geologic significance of larger benthic foraminifera. 1st ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
5. Cavalier-Smith, T. 2005. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann. Bot. 95:147-175.
6. Chan, Y. H., and W. F. Marshall . 2010. Scaling properties of cell and organelle size. Organogenesis 6:88-96.
7. Charnov, E. L., and S. K. M. Ernest . 2006. The offspring-size/clutch-size trade-off in mammals. Am. Nat. 167:578-582.
8. Clarke, A., and N. M. Johnston . 1999. Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 68:893-905.
9. Drooger, C. W. 1963. Evolutionary trends in Miogypsinidae. Pp. 415-433 in Evolutionary trends in foraminifera. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
10. Duarte, C. M., and M. Alcaraz . 1989. To produce many small or few large eggs: a size-independent reproductive tactic of fish. Oecologia 80:401-404.
11. Ellis, B. F., and A. R. Messina . 1940. Catalogue of foraminifera. The American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
12. Falster, D. S., A. T. Moles, and M. Westoby . 2008. A general model for the scaling of offspring size and adult size. Am. Nat. 172:299-317.
13. Gregory, T. R. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cellsize, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. 76:65-101.
14. Gregory, T. R., P. D. N. Hebert, and J. Kolasa . 2000. Evolutionary implications of the relationship between genome size and body size in flatworms and copepods. Heredity 84:201-208.
15. Grubb, P. J., D. A. Coomes, and D. J. Metcalf . 2005. Comment on "A brief history of seed size". Science 310:783a.
16. Hallock, P. 1985. Why are larger foraminifera large? Paleobiology 11:195-208.
17. Hendriks, A. J., and C. Mulder . 2008. Scaling of offspring number and mass to plant and animal size: model and meta-analysis. Oecologia 155:705-716.
18. Kaplan, R. H., and S. N. Salthe . 1979. The allometry of reproduction: an empirical view of salamanders. Am. Nat. 113:671-689.
19. Kiflawi, M. 2006. On optimal propagule size and developmental time. OIKOS 104:168-173.
20. Kiørboe, T., and M. Sabatini . 1995. Scaling of fecundity, growth and development in marine planktonic copepods. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 120:285-298.
21. Koepnick, R. B., and R. L. Kaesler . 1974. Character correlations and morphologic variations of Triticites cullomensis (Fusulinacea). J. Paleontol. 48:36-40.
22. Legendre, P. 2013. lmodel2: Model II Regression. R package version 1.7-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmodel2
23. Loeblich, A. R., and H. Tappan . 1982. Classification of the Foraminiferida. Pp. 22-36. in T. W. Broadhead, ed. Foraminifera, notes for a short course. Stud. Geol. 6. Department of Geology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
24. Moles, A. T., D. D. Ackerly, C. O. Webb, J. C. Tweddle, J. B. Dickie, and M. Westoby . 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307:576-580.
25. Nagl, W. 1978. Endopolyploidy and polyteny in differentiation and evolution: Towards an understanding of quantitative and qualitative variation of nuclear DNA in ontogeny and phylogeny. North-Holland Pub. Co. New York, NY.
26. Nigam, R., and A. S. Rao . 1987. Proloculus size variation in recent benthic foraminifera-Implications for paleoclimatic studies. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 24:649-655.
27. Ogg, G., and F. M. Gradstein . 2008. The concise geologic timescale. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed February 2, 2012.
30. Rego, B. L., S. C. Wang, D. Altiner, and J. L. Payne . 2012. Within- and among-genus components of size evolution during mass extinction, recovery, and background intervals: A case study of Late Permian through Late Triassic foraminifera. Paleobiology 38:627-643.
31. Röttger, R., and R. Krüger . 1990. Observations on the biology of Calcarinidae (Foraminiferida). Marine Biol. 106:419-425.
32. Savage, V. M., A. P. Allen, J. H. Brown, J. F. Gillooly, A. B. Herman, W. H. Woodruff, and G. B. West . 2007. Scaling of number, size, and metabolic rate of cells with body size in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:4718-4723.
33. Schenck, H. G. 1944. Proloculus in foraminifera. J. Paleontol. 18:275-282.
34. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1975. Animal physiology: adaptation and environment. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. Seiglie, G. A. 1975. Foraminifers of Guayanilla Bay and their use as environmental indicators. Rev. Esp. Micropaleontologia. 7:453-487.
36. Smith, C. C., and S. D. Fretwell . 1974. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 108:499-506.
37. Tummers, B. 2006. DataThief III. http://datathief.org
38. Turner, J. J., J. C. Ewald, and J. M. Skotheim . 2012. Cell size control in yeast. Curr. Biol. 22:350-359.
39. Warton, D. I., R. A. Duursma, D. S. Falster, and Taskinen, Sara . 2012. smatr 3-an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:257-259.
40. Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York, USA.