Differences in the pattern of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy in two high-volume centres

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Bo Svendsen, Lars ^a   Jensen, Lone Susanne ^b   Holm, Jakob ^a   Christian Kofoed, Steen ^a   Pilegaard, Hans ^b   Preisler, Louise ^a   Vinbæk, Marianne ^b   Brandt, Bodil ^a   Svendsen, Morten B ^c  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STOMACH; THORACOSCOPY; TIME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH; THORACOSCOPY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84888797323     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ott K, Bader FG, Lordick F et al. Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced centre. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1017-1025.
2. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O et al. Outcomes after minimal invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2012;256:95-103.
3. Zakrison T, Bartolomeu A, Nascimento Jr et al. Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. World J Surg 2007;31:1627-1634.
4. Jensen LS, Parvaiz I, Utzon J et al. Oesophageal resections in Denmark 1997-2000. Ugeskr Læger 2002;164: 4423-4427.
5. Jensen LS, Bendixen A, Kehlet H. Organisation and early outcomes of major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Denmark. Scand J Surg 2007;96:41-45.
6. https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/75/1875_decv_rapport2012_final.pdf (1 October 2013).
7. Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AGK et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2012;255:658-666.
8. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating eso -pha g ectomy: a review. Am J Gastroent. 1995;169:634-640.
9. Dindo D, Demartines D, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with estimation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
10. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010: 3rd English ed. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123.
11. Bisgaard T, Wøjdemann M, Larsen H et al. Double-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for resection of esophagogastric or cardia cancer: new application for an old technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999;9:335-339.
12. Jensen LS, Pilegaard H, Eliasen M et al. Esophageal resection in an acce l-erated postoperative recovery regimen. Ugeskr Læger 2004;166:2560-2563.
13. Page RD, Shackcloth MJ, Russell GN et al. Surgical treatment of anasto-motic leaks after esophagectomy. Eur J Cardio-thor Surg 2005;27:337-43.
14. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan M Y, Khan ZM et al. Anastomotic leakage post- esophageogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 2005;27:3-7.
15. Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM et al. Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy Br J Surg 2001;88: 1346-1351.
16. Pham TH, Kyle AP, Enestvedt K et al. Decreased conduit perfusion mea s-ured by spectroscopy is associated with anastomotic complications. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:380-386.
17. Schröder W, Stippel D, Gutschow C, et al. Postoperative recovery of microcirculation after gastric tube formation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:267-227.
18. Ndoye J-M, Dia A, Ndiaye A et al. Arteriography of three models of gastric oesophagoplasty: the whole stomach, a wide gastric tube and a narrow gastric tube. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:429-4371.
19. Michelet P, D́Journo XP, Rock A, Papazian J et al. Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. Chest 2005;128:3461-3466.
20. Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS et al. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.034.