The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A multicenter orthopaedic outcomes network (MOON) cohort study

Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1948-1953

  Mariscalco, Michael W ^a   Flanigan, David C ^a   Mitchell, Joshua ^a   Pedroza, Angela D ^a   Jones, Morgan H ^b   Andrish, Jack T ^b   Parker, Richard D ^b   Kaeding, Christopher C ^a   Magnussen, Robert A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE DRILL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE MARKER; FEMALE; FEMORAL TUNNEL DRILLING; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; HAMSTRING; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; HUMAN; INTERFERENCE SCREW; INTERNATIONAL KNEE DOCUMENTATION COMMITTEE SCORE; KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; REHABILITATION CARE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL DRILL; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; TENDON GRAFT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; AUTOGRAFTS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; KNEE INJURIES; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888638696     PISSN: 07498063     EISSN: 15263231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T.E. Hewett, S.J. Schultz, and L.Y. Griffin Understanding and preventing noncontact ACL injuries 2007 Human Kinetics Champaign, IL
2. M. Ahlden, K. Samuelsson, N. Sernert, M. Forssblad, J. Karlsson, and J. Kartus The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: A report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients Am J Sports Med 40 2012 2230 2235
3. D.L. Hamner, C.H. Brown Jr., M.E. Steiner, A.T. Hecker, and W.C. Hayes Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 1999 549 557
4. T.W. Wilson, M.P. Zafuta, and M. Zobitz A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts Am J Sports Med 27 1999 202 207
5. C.B. Ma, E. Keifa, W. Dunn, F.H. Fu, and C.D. Harner Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17 2010 81 83
6. R. Schwartzberg, B. Burkhart, and C. Lariviere Prediction of hamstring autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate reconstruction Am J Orthop 37 2008 157 159
7. G. Treme, D.R. Diduch, M.J. Billante, M.D. Miller, and J.M. Hart Hamstring graft size prediction: A prospective clinical evaluation Am J Sports Med 36 2008 2204 2209
8. J.M. Tuman, D.R. Diduch, L.J. Rubino, J.A. Baumfeld, H.S. Nguyen, and J.M. Hart Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Am J Sports Med 35 2007 1945 1949
9. R.A. Magnussen, J.T. Lawrence, R.L. West, A.P. Toth, D.C. Taylor, and W.E. Garrett Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft Arthroscopy 28 2012 526 531
10. S.Y. Park, H. Oh, S. Park, J.H. Lee, S.H. Lee, and K.H. Yoon Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21 2013 1111 1118
11. E.M. Roos, and L.S. Lohmander The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): From joint injury to osteoarthritis Health Qual Life Outcomes 1 2003 64
12. J.J. Irrgang, A.F. Anderson, and A.L. Boland Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form Am J Sports Med 29 2001 600 613
13. R.W. Wright, R.A. Magnussen, W.R. Dunn, and K.P. Spindler Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: A systematic review J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 2011 1159 1165
14. R.W. Wright, W.R. Dunn, and A. Amendola Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective MOON cohort study Am J Sports Med 35 2007 1131 1134
15. R.W. Wright Knee injury outcomes measures J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17 2009 31 39
16. J.J. Irrgang, A.F. Anderson, and A.L. Boland Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form Am J Sports Med 34 2006 1567 1573
17. K.D. Shelbourne, T. Gray, and M. Haro Incidence of subsequent injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft Am J Sports Med 37 2009 246 251
18. A.M. Barrett, J.A. Craft, W.H. Replogle, J.M. Hydrick, and G.R. Barrett Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: A comparison of graft type based on age and Tegner activity level Am J Sports Med 39 2011 2194 2198
19. C.C. Kaeding, B. Aros, and A. Pedroza Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Predictors of failure from a MOON Prospective longitudinal cohort Sports Health 3 2011 73 81
20. J.R. Borchers, A. Pedroza, and C. Kaeding Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: A case-control study Am J Sports Med 37 2009 2362 2367
21. E.K. Reinke, K.P. Spindler, and D. Lorring Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19 2011 1806 1816