Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1806-1816

  Reinke, Emily K ^a   Spindler, Kurt P ^a   Lorring, Dawn ^b   Jones, Morgan H ^b   Schmitz, Leah ^b   Flanigan, David C ^c   An, Angel Qi ^a   Quiram, Amanda R ^a   Preston, Emily ^a   Martin, Michael ^c   Schroeder, Bettina ^c   Parker, Richard D ^b   Kaeding, Christopher C ^c   Borzi, Lynn ^b   Pedroza, Angela ^c   Huston, Laura J ^a   Harrell Jr , Frank E ^a   Dunn, Warren R ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ACL; Function; Hop test; IKDC; KOOS; Marx activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE INJURY; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80054116253     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1473-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ageberg E, Thomee R, Neeter C et al (2008) Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum 59: 1773-1779.
2. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS et al (2006) The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med 34: 128-135.
3. Bach BR Jr, Tradonsky S, Bojchuk J et al (1998) Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med 26: 20-29.
4. Bent NP, Wright CC, Rushton AB et al (2009) Selecting outcome measures in sports medicine: a guide for practitioners using the example of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med 43: 1006-1012.
5. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale.
6. Denegar CR, Vela LI, Evans TA (2008) Evidence-based sports medicine: outcomes instruments for active populations. Clin Sports Med 27: 339-351 vii.
7. Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2010) Predictors of activity level 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study. Am J Sports Med 38: 2040-2050.
8. Dunn WR, Spindler KP, Amendola A et al (2010) Which preoperative factors, including bone bruise, are associated with knee pain/symptoms at index anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)? A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study. Am J Sports Med 38: 1778-1787.
9. Hurd WJ, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2008) A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: part 2, determinants of dynamic knee stability. Am J Sports Med 36: 48-56.
10. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29: 600-613.
11. Keskula DR, Duncan JB, Davis VL et al (1996) Functional outcome measures for knee dysfunction assessment. J Athl Train 31: 105-110.
12. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K et al (2002) Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 1560-1572.
13. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC et al (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 29: 213-218.
14. Moller E, Weidenhielm L, Werner S (2009) Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17: 786-794.
15. Neeb TB, Aufdemkampe G, Wagener JH et al (1997) Assessing anterior cruciate ligament injuries: the association and differential value of questionnaires, clinical tests, and functional tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26: 324-331.
16. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19: 513-518.
17. Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sunden-Lundius A (2006) Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. Population-based reference data for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7: 38.
18. Paradowski PT, Englund M, Lohmander LS et al (2005) The effect of patient characteristics on variability in pain and function over two years in early knee osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3: 59.
19. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, 2. 9. 2 edn, Vienna, Austria.
20. Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW et al (2007) Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther 87: 337-349.
21. Roos EM, Bremander AB, Englund M et al (2008) Change in self-reported outcomes and objective physical function over 7 years in middle-aged subjects with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 505-510.
22. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS et al (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28: 88-96.
23. Ross MD, Langford B, Whelan PJ (2002) Test-retest reliability of 4 single-leg horizontal hop tests. J Strength Cond Res 16: 617-622.
24. Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K et al (1999) Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7: 160-165.
25. Suk M, Norvell DC, Hanson B et al (2008) Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery: what is evidence without the outcomes? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16: 123-129.
26. Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG et al (2007) Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med 35: 1450-1458.
27. Valovich McLeod TC, Snyder AR, Parsons JT et al (2008) Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part II: clinical outcomes assessment. J Athl Train 43: 437-445.
28. von Porat A, Holmstrom E, Roos EM (2008) Reliability and validity of videotaped functional performance tests in ACL-injured subjects. Physiother Res Int 13: 119-130.
29. Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM et al (1994) The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20: 60-73.
30. Wright RW (2009) Knee injury outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17: 31-39.