Student evaluations of teaching as 'fact-totems': The case of the UK national student survey

Sociological Research Online

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Sabri, Duna ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Higher education policy; Sociology of statistics; Student choice; University league tables

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888603465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13607804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5153/sro.3136     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BECHER, T. & Trowler, P. (2001) Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
2. BROWNE, J. (2010) Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education: An Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance in England, October.
3. DAVIES, P., Slack, K., Hughes, A. & Mangan, J. (2010) Understanding the Information Needs of Users of Public Information About Higher Education, Report to HEFCE, with Oakleigh Consulting Limited, May. Retrieved April 27, 2011, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2010/rd12_10/rd12_10b.pdf.
4. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2011a) Higher education: Students at the heart of the system. Retrieved 15 December, 2011, from http://discuss.bis.gov.uk/hereform/white-paper/
5. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) (2011b) Higher Education: Students at the Heart of the System Cm 8122. London: HMSO.
6. DE SANTOS, M. (2009) 'Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001', Sociological Theory, 27(4) p. 466-489.
7. DEWEY, J. (1938/1997). Experience and Education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8. ESPELAND, W.N. & M. Sauder (2007) 'Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds', American Journal of Sociology, 113(1) p. 1-40.
9. GALBRAITH, C., Merrill, G. & Kline, D. (2011) 'Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student learning outcomes in business related classes? A neural network and Bayesian analyses', Research in Higher Education, 52(6) p. 1-22
10. GUILE, D.J. (2010) 'Learning to work in the creative and cultural sector: New spaces, pedagogies and expertise', Journal of Education Policy, 25(4) p. 465-484.
11. HAGEL, P., Carr, R. & Devlin, M. (2012) 'Conceptualising and measuring student engagement through the Australian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE): a critique', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4) p. 475-486.
12. HARDING, J. (2012) 'Choice and information in the public sector: a higher education case study', Social Policy and Society, 11 p. 171-182.
13. HIGHER EDUCATION ACADEMY (HEA) (2010) Using the National Student Survey for enhancementhttp://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/ipp/Issue5_NSS Accessed 1 August 2010.
14. HEFCE (2002) 02/15 Information on Quality and Standards for Higher Education. Bristol: HEFCE.
15. HEFCE (2004) 04/22 National Student Survey 2005: Consultation. Bristol: HEFCE.
16. HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL FOR ENGLAND (HEFCE) (2011) 2011/18 Statement of Policy Provision of information about higher education: Outcomes of consultation and next steps. Bristol: HEFCE.
17. Hickey, T., Devenney, M., Noakes, L. et al., University of Brighton (2010) NSS Result: Unsatisfactory, THE, 30 September 2010.
18. HOLMWOOD et al. (2011) Clarity for student buyers, THE, 10 February 2011.
19. KUH, G. (2009) 'the national survey of student engagement: conceptual and empirical foundations', New Directions for Institutional Research, 141(Spring) p. 5-20.
20. LE GRAND, J. (2003) Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. MARSH, H.W. (2007) 'Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective', in Perry, R.P. & Smart, J.C. (Eds.), The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective (p. 319-384). New York: Springer.
22. MIDDLEHURST, R. (1997) 'Enhancing quality', in Coffield, F. & Williamson, B. (Eds.), Repositioning Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/ Open University Press.
23. MORLEY, L. (2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
24. National Student Survey. Available at: http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/faqs/faqs_4.html (accessed 30 January 2012)
25. National Student Survey of Student Engagement. Available at: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/survey_instruments/2011/NSSE2011_US_English_Paper.pdf (accessed 30 January 2012)
26. OSBORNE, T. & Rose, N. (1999) 'Do the social sciences create phenomena?: the example of public opinion research,' British Journal of Sociology, 50(3) p. 367-396.
27. PENNY, A.R. & Coe, R. (2004) 'Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: a meta-analysis', Review of Educational Research, 74(2) p. 215-253.
28. PORTER, S.R. (2011) 'Do college student surveys have any validity', The Review of Higher Education, 35(1) p. 45-76.
29. PORTER, T.M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. RAMSDEN, P. (1991) 'A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire', Studies in Higher Education, 16(2) p. 129-150.
31. RAMSDEN, P., Batchelor, D., Peacock, A., Temple, P. & Watson, D. (2010) Enhancing and Developing the National Student Survey. London: Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education.
32. REAY, D., David, M.E. & Ball, S. (2005) Degrees of Choice: Social Class, Race and Gender in Higher Education. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
33. RICHARDSON, J.T.E., Slater, J. et al. (2007) 'The National Student Survey: Development, findings and implications', Studies in Higher Education, 32(5) p. 557-580.
34. RICHARDSON, J.T.E. (2012) 'The role of response biases in the relationship between students' perceptions of their courses and their approaches to studying in higher education', British Educational Research Journal, 38(3) p. 339-418
35. SABRI, D. (2010) 'Absence of the academic from higher education policy', Journal of Education Policy, 25(2) p. 191-205.
36. SABRI, D. (2011) 'What's wrong with "the student experience"?', Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5) p. 657-667.
37. SPOOREN, P., Mortelmans, D. & Thijssen, P. (2012) '"Content" versus "style": acquiescence in student evaluation of teaching?', British Educational Research Journal, 38(1) p. 3-21.
38. SAUDER, M. & Espeland, W.N. (2009) 'The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change', American Sociological Review, 74(1) p. 63-82.
39. VAUGHAN, D. & Yorke, M. (2010) 'I can't believe it's not better': The Paradox of NSS Scores for Art & Design. ADM-HEA Subject Centre of the Higher Education Academy and the HEAD Trust.