Linking great apes genome evolution across time scales using polymorphism-aware phylogenetic models

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2249-2262

  De Maio, Nicola ^a   Schlötterer, Christian ^a   Kosiol, Carolin ^a  

^a Institute of Populationsgenetik   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biased gene conversion; Coding sequence evolution; Mutation rates; Phylogenetics population genetics model; Primates evolution; Rate heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; APE; ARTICLE; CHIMPANZEE; CHROMOSOME; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EVOLUTION; EXOME; GENE CONVERSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PAN TROGLODYTES; PHYLOGENY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

BIASED GENE CONVERSION; CODING SEQUENCE EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATES; PHYLOGENETICS-POPULATION GENETICS MODEL; PRIMATES EVOLUTION; RATE HETEROGENEITY;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXOME; GENE CONVERSION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; PAN TROGLODYTES; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; PONGO; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84888597013     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst131     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. 2010. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467: 1061-1073.
2. Akashi H, Ko W, Piao S, John A, Goel P, Lin C, Vitins A. 2006. Molecular evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup: frequent parameter fluctuations on the timescale of molecular divergence. Genetics 172:1711-1726.
3. Alvarez-Valin F, Clay O, Cruveiller S, Bernardi G. 2004. Inaccurate reconstruction of ancestral GC levels creates a vanishing isochores effect. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 31:788-793.
4. Auton A, Fledel-Alon A, Pfeifer S, et al. (23 co-authors). 2012. A fine-scale chimpanzee genetic map from population sequencing. Science 336: 193-198.
5. Belle E, Duret L, Galtier N, Eyre-Walker A. 2004. The decline of isochores in mammals: An assessment of the GC content variation along the mammalian phylogeny. J Mol Evol. 58:653-660.
6. Bernardi G. 2000. Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. Gene 241:3-17.
7. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg NA, RoyChoudhury A. 2012. Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 1917-1932.
8. Chamary J, Parmley J, Hurst L. 2006. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 7:98-108.
9. Charlesworth B, Bartolomé C, Noël V. 2005. The detection of shared and ancestral polymorphisms. Genet Res. 86:149-157.
10. Clark A. 1997. Neutral behavior of shared polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:7730.
11. Clay O, Caccio S, Zoubak S, Mouchiroud D, Bernardi G. 1996. Human coding and noncoding DNA: compositional correlations. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 5:2-12.
12. De Maio N, Holmes I, Schlötterer C, Kosiol C. 2013. Estimating empirical codon hidden markov models. Mol Biol Evol. 30:725-736.
13. Duret L. 2009. Mutation patterns in the human genome: more variable than expected. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000028.
14. Duret L, Arndt P. 2008. The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000071.
15. Duret L, Eyre-Walker A, Galtier N. 2006. A new perspective on isochore evolution. Gene 385:71-74.
16. Duret L, Galtier N. 2009. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 10: 285-311.
17. Duret L, Hurst L. 2001. The elevated GC content at exonic third sites is not evidence against neutralist models of isochore evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 18:757-762.
18. Duret L, Semon M, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Galtier N. 2002. Vanishing GC-rich isochores in mammalian genomes. Genetics 162:1837-1847.
19. Duret L, Semon M, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Galtier N. 2002. Vanishing GC-rich isochores in mammalian genomes. Genetics 162:1837-1847.
20. Dutheil J, Ganapathy G, Hobolth A, Mailund T, UyenoyamaM, Schierup M. 2009. Ancestral population genomics: The coalescent hidden Markov model approach. Genetics 183:259-274.
21. Eyre-Walker A, Hurst L. 2001. The evolution of isochores. Nat Rev Genet. 2:549-555.
22. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley P. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 8:610-618.
23. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
24. Fryxell K, Moon W. 2005. CpGmutation rates in the human genome are highly dependent on local GC content. Mol Biol Evol. 22:650-658.
25. Fryxell K, Zuckerkandl E. 2000. Cytosine deamination plays a primary role in the evolution of mammalian isochores. Mol Biol Evol. 17: 1371-1383.
26. Galtier N, Duret L, Glémin S, Ranwez V. 2009. GC-biased gene conversion promotes the fixation of deleterious amino acid changes in primates. Trends Genet. 25:1-5.
27. Galtier N, Gouy M. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 92: 11317-11321.
28. Gil M, Zanetti MS, Zoller S, Anisimova M. 2013. CodonPhyML: fast maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation under codon substitution models. Mol Biol Evol. 30:1270-1280.
29. Gilis D, Massar S, Cerf N, Rooman M. 2001. Optimality of the genetic code with respect to protein stability and amino-acid frequencies. Genome Biol. 2;RESEARCH0049.
30. Gronau I, Arbiza L, Mohammed J, Siepel A. 2013. Inference of natural selection from interspersed genomic elements based on polymorphism and divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 30:1159-1171.
31. Gu J, Li W. 2006. Are GC-rich isochores vanishing in mammals? Gene 385:50-56.
32. Haddrill P, Thornton K, Charlesworth B, Andolfatto P. 2005. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Res. 15: 790-799.
33. Heled J, Drummond A. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 27:570-580.
34. Hernandez R, Williamson S, Zhu L, Bustamante C. 2007. Context-dependent mutation rates may cause spurious signatures of a fixation bias favoring higher GC-content in humans. Mol Biol Evol. 24: 2196-2202.
35. Hobolth A, Christensen O, Mailund T, Schierup M. 2007. Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. 3:e7.
36. Hodgkinson A, Eyre-Walker A. 2011. Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet. 12:756-766.
37. Hodgkinson A, Ladoukakis E, Eyre-Walker A. 2009. Cryptic variation in the human mutation rate. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000027.
38. Hwang D, Green P. 2004. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101:13994-14001.
39. Kaiser VB, Charlesworth B. 2009. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution in non-recombining genomes. Trends Genet. 25:9-12.
40. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2007. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics 177: 2251-2261.
41. Liu L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 24:2542-2543.
42. Locke DP, Hillier LW, Warren WC, et al. (101 co-authors). 2011. Comparative and demographic analysis of orangutan genomes. Nature 469:529-533.
43. Lynch M. 2010. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:961-968.
44. Maddison W, Knowles L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst Biol. 55:21-30.
45. Mailund T, Dutheil J, Hobolth A, Lunter G, Schierup M. 2011. Estimating divergence time and ancestral effective population size of Bornean and Sumatran orangutan subspecies using a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001319.
46. McDonald JH, Kreitman M. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
47. Meunier J, Duret L. 2004. Recombination drives the evolution of GCcontent in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol. 21:984-990.
48. Moran P. 1958. Random processes in genetics. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc. 54:60-71.
49. Nagylaki T. 1983. Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 80:6278-6281.
50. rmley J, Hurst L. 2007. Exonic splicing regulatory elements skew synonymous codon usage near intron-exon boundaries in mammals. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1600-1603.
51. Peng B, Kimmel M. 2005. simuPOP: A forward-time population genetics simulation environment. Bioinformatics 21:3686-3687.
52. Polak P, Arndt P. 2008. Transcription induces strand-specific mutations at the 5 end of human genes. Genome Res. 18:1216-1223.
53. Polak P, Querfurth R, Arndt P. 2010. The evolution of transcriptionassociated biases of mutations across vertebrates. BMC Evol Biol. 10:187.
54. Pollard D, Iyer V, Moses A, Eisen M. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet. 2:e173.
55. Pond SLK, Frost SDW, Muse SV. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21:676-679.
56. Pruitt K, Harrow J, Harte R, et al. (49 co-authors). 2009. The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: identifying a common proteincoding gene set for the human and mouse genomes. Genome Res. 19:1316-1323.
57. Ratnakumar A, Mousset S, Glémin S, Berglund J, Galtier N, Duret L, Webster M. 2010. Detecting positive selection within genomes: The problem of biased gene conversion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365:2571-2580.
58. RoyChoudhury A, Felsenstein J, Thompson E. 2008. A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree. Genetics 180:1095-1105.
59. Schneider A, Charlesworth B, Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2011. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations. Genetics 189:1427-1437.
60. Seo T, Kishino H. 2009. Statistical comparison of nucleotide, amino acid, and codon substitution models for evolutionary analysis of proteincoding sequences. Syst Biol. 58:199.
61. Spencer C, Deloukas P, Hunt S, Mullikin J, Myers S, Silverman B, Donnelly P, Bentley D, McVean G. 2006. The influence of recombination on human genetic diversity. PLoS Genet. 2:e148.
62. Squartini F, Arndt P. 2008. Quantifying the stationarity and time reversibility of the nucleotide substitution process. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 2525-2535.
63. Vogl C, Clemente F. 2012. The allele-frequency spectrum in a decoupled Moran model with mutation, drift, and directional selection, assuming small mutation rates. Theor Popul Biol. 81:197-209.
64. Wakeley J. 2009. Coalescent theory: An introduction. Greenwood Village: Roberts & Company Publishers.
65. Whelan S, Liò P, Goldman N. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics: state-ofthe- Art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet. 17:262-272.
66. Willie E, Majewski J. 2004. Evidence for codon bias selection at the premRNA level in eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 20:534-538.
67. Wilson D, Hernandez R, Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. 2011. A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002395.
68. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2008. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 25:568-579.
69. Yang Z, Roberts D. 1995. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer early branchings in the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 12:451-458.
70. Zeng K, Charlesworth B. 2009. Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population. Genetics 183: 651-662.