The POP buffer: Rapid progressive clustering by geometry quantization

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 197-206

  Limper, M ^a,b   Jung, Y ^b   Behr, J ^b   Alexa, M ^c  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER IGD   (Germany)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; LEVELS OF DETAIL; MESH PARTITIONING; PROGRESSIVE ENCODING; RAPID ENCODING; STRAIGHT-FORWARD METHOD; VIEW-DEPENDENT LOD; WEB-BASED ENVIRONMENT;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84888587529     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12227     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. [AD01], Alliez P., Desbrun M.,: Progressive compression for lossless transmission of triangle meshes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (2001), pp. 195-202. 2, 8.
2. [ALAK11], Ahn J.-K., Lee D.-Y., Ahn M., Kim C.-S.,: Rd optimized progressive compression of 3d meshes using prioritized gate selection and curvature prediction. Vis. Comput. (2011), 769-779. 2.
3. [BCG05], Ben-Chen M., Gotsman C.,: On the optimality of spectral compression of mesh data. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 1 (2005), 60-80. 2.
4. [BEJZ09], Behr J., Eschler P., Jung Y., Zöllner M.,: X3DOM: a DOM-based HTML5/X3D integration model. In Proc. Web3D (2009), pp. 127-135. 1.
5. [BJFS12], Behr J., Jung Y., Franke T., Sturm T.,: Using images and explicit binary container for efficient and incremental delivery of declarative 3D scenes on the web. In Proc. Web3D (2012), pp. 17-25. 2.
6. [Cho97], Chow M. M.,: Optimized geometry compression for real-time rendering. In Proc. VIS (1997), pp. 347-354. 2.
7. [Chu12], Chun W.,: WebGL models: End-to-end. In OpenGL Insights. CRC Press, 2012, pp. 431-454. 2.
8. [DBPGS10], Di Benedetto M., Ponchio F., Ganovelli F., Scopigno R.,: SpiderGL: a javascript 3D graphics library for next-generation WWW. In Proc. Web3D (2010), pp. 165-174. 1.
9. [Dee95], Deering M.,: Geometry compression. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (1995), pp. 13-20. 2.
10. [DT07], DeCoro C., Tatarchuk N.,: Real-time mesh simplification using the gpu. In Proc. 13D (2007), pp. 161-166. 3.
11. [GH97], Garland M., Heckbert P. S.,: Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (1997), pp. 209-216. 3, 6, 7.
12. [Hop96], Hoppe H.,: Progressive meshes. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (1996), pp. 99-108. 2.
13. [Hop98], Hoppe H.,: Efficient implementation of progressive meshes. Computers & Graphics (1998), 27-36. 1.
14. [HSH09], Hu L., Sander P. V., Hoppe H.,: Parallel view-dependent refinement of progressive meshes. In Proc. I3D (2009), pp. 169-176. 2, 6.
15. [HV01], Hao X., Varshney A.,: Variable-precision rendering. In Proc. I3D (2001), pp. 149-158. 2, 5.
16. [IL05], Isenburg M., Lindstrom P.,: Streaming meshes. In Proc. VIS (2005), pp. 231-238. 7.
17. [JPP08], Jovanova B., Preda M., Preteux F.,: MPEG4 Part 25: A Generic Model for 3D Graphics Compression. In Proc. 3DTV-CON (2008), pp. 101-104. 2.
18. [Kil08], Kilgard M. J.,: Modern opengl usage: Using vertex buffer objects well. In SIGGRAPH ASIA courses (Contributed Chapter) (2008), pp. 13:1-13:31. 9.
19. [LCD13], Lavoué G., Chevalier L., Dupont F.,: Streaming compressed 3D data on the web using JavaScript and WebGL. In Proc. Web3D (2013), pp. 19-28. 1, 2.
20. [LCL10], Lee J., Choe S., Lee S.,: Mesh geometry compression for mobile graphics. In Proc. CCNC (2010), pp. 301-305. 2, 6, 8.
21. [LE97], Luebke D., Erikson C.,: View-dependent simplification of arbitrary polygonal environments. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (1997), pp. 199-208. 3.
22. [Lin00], Lindstrom P.,: Out-of-core simplification of large polygonal models. In Proc. SIGGRAPH (2000), pp. 259-262. 3.
23. [LLD12], Lee H., Lavoué G., Dupont F.,: Rate-distortion optimization for progressive compression of 3d mesh with color attributes. Vis. Comput. (2012), 137-153. 2.
24. [LT97], Low K.-L., Tan T.-S.,: Model simplification using vertex-clustering. In Proc. I3D (1997), pp. 75-81. 3.
25. [LWC*02], Luebke D., Watson B., Cohen J. D., Reddy M., VARSHNEY A.,: Level of Detail for 3D Graphics. Elsevier Science Inc., 2002. 3.
26. [LWS*13], Limper M., Wagner S., Stein C., Jung Y., Stork A.,: Fast delivery of 3D web content: A case study. In Proc. Web3D (2013), pp. 11-18. 2, 8.
27. [MCAH12], Maglo A., Courbet C., Alliez P., Hudelot C.,: Progressive compression of manifold polygon meshes. Comput. Graph. (2012), 349-359. 8.
28. [MSGS11], Meyer Q., Sussner G., Greiner G., Stam-minger M.,: Adaptive level-of-precision for gpu-rendering. In Proc. VMV (2011), pp. 169-176. 2, 4, 6.
29. [PBCK05], Purnomo B., Bilodeau J., Cohen J. D., Kumar S.,: Hardware-compatible vertex compression using quantization and simplification. In Proc. HWWS (2005), pp. 53-61. 2.
30. [PK05], Peng J., Kuo C.-C. J.,: Geometry-guided progressive lossless 3d mesh coding with octree (ot) decomposition. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3 (2005), 609-616. 2.
31. [PKJK05], Peng J., Kim C.-S., Jay Kuo C. C.,: Technologies for 3d mesh compression: A survey. J. Vis. Comun. Image Represent. (2005), 688-733. 1, 2.
32. [PLS08], Pool J., Lastra A., Singh M.,: Energy-precision tradeoffs in mobile graphics processing units. In ICCD (2008), IEEE, pp. 60-67. 2.
33. [PR00], Pajarola R. B., Rossignac J.,: Squeeze: Fast and progressive decompression of triangle meshes. In Proc. CGI (2000), pp. 173-182. 1.
34. [RB92], Rossignac J., Borrel P.,: Multi-resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes. Tech. rep., 1992. IBM Research Report RC 17697. 3, 7.
35. [SM05], Sander P. V., Mitchell J. L.,: Progressive buffers: view-dependent geometry and texture lod rendering. In Proc. SGP (2005), pp. 129-138. 3, 4, 6.
36. [SNB07], Sander P. V., Nehab D., Barczak J.,: Fast triangle reordering for vertex locality and reduced overdraw. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3 (2007), 89:1-89-9. 3, 8, 9.
37. [SS97], Schmalstieg D., Schaufler G.,: Smooth levels of detail. In Proc. VRAIS (1997), pp. 12-19. 3, 6.
38. [Sva99], Svarovsky J.,: Extreme detail graphics. In Proc. Game Developers Conference (1999), pp. 889-904. 2, 6.
39. [Wil11], Willmott A.,: Rapid simplification of multi-attribut meshes. In Proc. HPG (2011), pp. 151-158. 3, 6, 7.