Perceived relevance of honesty and agreeableness to situations with non-correspondent and correspondent outcomes: An interdependence perspective

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 593-599

  Cooley, Erin ^a   Rea, Andrew J ^a   Insko, Chester A ^a   Payne, B Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888439529     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1979     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The big seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300-307.
2. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1, 710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-721.
3. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.
4. Cohen, T. R., Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2010). How communication increases interpersonal cooperation in mixed-motive situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 39-50.
5. Colman, A. M. (1995). Game theory and its application in the social and biological sciences. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347-364.
7. Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116-123.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
10. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
11. Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516-519.
12. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
13. Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N., Reis, H., Rusbult, C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kirchner, J. L. (2005). Situational affordances and interpersonal cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
15. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
16. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
17. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structures in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 574-583.
18. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
19. Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.
20. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
21. Wolf, S. T., Insko, C. A., Kirchner, J. L., & Wildschut, T. (2008). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity in the domain of correspondent outcomes: The role of relativistic concern, perceived categorization, and the doctrine of mutual assured destruction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 479-494.