Making Sense of Social Practice: Theoretical Pluralism in Public Sector Accounting Research: A Reply

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 111-115

  Jacobs, Kerry ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

accounting research; public sector; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888434766     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/faam.12005     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. rd ed., The University of Chicago Press Chicago).
2. Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
3. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1991), The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries (de Gruytere, Berlin).
4. Chua, W.F. and H. Mahama (2011), ‘On Theory as a ‘Deliverable’ and its Relevance in Policy Arenas’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 78–82.
5. Humphrey, C. and R. Scapens (1996), ‘Theories and Case Studies of Organizational Accounting Practices: Limitation or Liberation’, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 86–106.
6. Jacobs, K. (2012), ‘Making Sense of Social Practice: Theorising Pluralism in Public Sector Accounting Research’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1–25.
7. Modell, S. (2013), ‘Making Sense of Social Practice: Theoretical Pluralism in Public Sector Accounting Research: A Comment’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 99–110.
8. Vaivio, J. (2008), ‘Qualitative Management Accounting Research: Rationale, Pitfalls and Potential’, Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 64–86.
9. Young, J. and A. Preston (1996), ‘Are Accounting Researchers Under the Tyranny of Single Theory Perspectives?’, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 107–11.