Qualitative management accounting research: Rationale, pitfalls and potential

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 64-86

  Vaivio, Juhani ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Management accounting; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993019179     PISSN: 11766093     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/11766090810856787     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Ahrens, T. (1997), “Talking accounting: an ethnography of management knowledge in British and German brewers”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22, pp. 617-36.
2. Ahrens, T. (2007), “Overcoming the subjective-objective divide in interpretive management accounting research”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33, pp. 292-7.
3. Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C. (2002), “The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a UK restaurant chain”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 151-71.
4. Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C. (2006), “Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 819-41.
5. Ahrens, T. and Dent, J. (1998), “Accounting and organizations: realizing the richness of field research”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 1-39.
6. Andon, P., Baxter, J. and Chua, W.F. (2007), “Accounting change as relational drifting: a field study of experiments with performance measurement”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 273-308.
7. Ansari, S. and Euske, K. (1987), “Rational, rationalizing and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 549-70.
8. Armstrong, P. (2007), “Calling out for more: comment on the future of interpretive accounting research”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting (in press).
9. Bariff, M. and Galbraith, J. (1978), “Intraorganizational power considerations for designing information systems”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 15-27.
10. Baxter, J. and Chua, W.F. (2003), “Alternative management accounting research – whence and whither”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 97-126.
11. Bhimani, A. (1993), “Indeterminacy and the specificity of accounting change: Renault 1898-1938”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 1-39.
12. Birnberg, J., Shields, M. and Young, S. (1990), “The case for multiple methods in empirical management accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting)”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Fall, pp. 33-66.
13. Briers, M. and Chua, W.F. (2001), “The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26, pp. 237-9.
14. Brunsson, N. (1982), “The irrationality of action and action rationality: decisions, ideologies and organizational actions”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 29-44.
15. Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy, Wiley, Chichester.
16. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A. and Hughes, J. (1980), “The roles of accounting in organizations and society”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5, pp. 5-27.
17. Burns, J. and Scapens, R. (2000), “Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 3-25.
18. Burns, J. and Vaivio, J. (2001), “Management accounting change”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 389-402.
19. Clegg, S. and Palmer, G. (Eds) (1996), The Politics of Management Knowledge, Sage, London.
20. Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. (1988), “Measure cost right: make the right decision”, Harvard Business Review, September/October, pp. 96-103.
21. Covaleski, M. and Dirsmith, M. (1988), “The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: a historically informed field study”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-24.
22. Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963), The Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Dent, J. (1987), “Tension in the design of formal control systems: a field study in a computer company”, in Bruns, W. Jr and Kaplan, R. (Eds), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 119-45.
24. Dent, J. (1991), “Accounting and organizational cultures: a field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 705-32.
25. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1991), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, in Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (Eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 63-82.
26. Donaldson, G. and Lorsch, J. (1983), Decision Making at the Top: The Shaping of Strategic Direction, Basic Books Inc., New York, NY.
27. Dyer, W.G. and Wilkins, A.L. (1991), “Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eishenhart”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 613-9.
28. Eisenhart, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532-50.
29. Ezzamel, M. (1994), “Organizational change and accounting: understanding the budgeting system in its organizational context”, Organization Studies, Vol. 15, pp. 213-40.
30. Ferreira, L. and Merchant, K. (1992), “Field research in management accounting and control: a review and evaluation”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 3-34.
31. Galbraith, J. (1978), The New Industrial State, Penguin Press, New York, NY.
32. Granlund, M. (2001), “Towards explaining stability in and around management accounting systems”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 141-66.
33. Granlund, M. and Lukka, K. (1997), “Towards increasing business orientation: Finnish management accounting culture in transition”, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 203-55.
34. Hope, J. and Fraser, R. (2003), “Who needs budgets?”, Harvard Business Review, February, pp. 108-15.
35. Hopwood, A. (1983), “On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8, pp. 287-305.
36. Hopwood, A. (1986), “Management accounting and organizational action: an introduction”, in Bromwich, M. and Hopwood, A. (Eds), Research and Current Issues in Management Accounting, Pitman, London, pp. 9-30.
37. Horngren, C., Datar, S. and Foster, G. (2003), Cost Accounting – A Managerial Emphasis, 11th ed., Pearson Education, Harlow, NJ.
38. Humphrey, C. and Scapens, R. (1996), “Methodological themes – theories and case studies of organizational accounting practices: limitation or liberation?”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 86-106.
39. Jackson, B. (2001), Management Gurus and Management Fashions, Routledge, London.
40. Jazayeri, M. and Hopper, T. (1999), “Management accounting within world class manufacturing: a case study”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 263-301.
41. Johnson, H. and Kaplan, R. (1987), Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
42. Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M-L., Lukka, K. and Kuorikoski, J. (2008a), “Straddling between paradigms: a naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33 Nos 2 / 3, pp. 267-91.
43. Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M-L., Lukka, K. and Kuorikoski, J. (2008b), “No premature closures of debates, please: a response to Ahrens”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33 Nos 2 / 3, pp. 298-301.
44. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1996), “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 75-85.
45. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (2001), The Strategy Focused Organization. How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
46. Kasurinen, T. (2002), “Exploring management accounting change: the case of a balanced scorecard implementation”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 13, pp. 323-43.
47. Keating, P. (1995), “A framework for classifying and evaluating the theoretical contributions of case research in management accounting”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Fall, pp. 66-86.
48. Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
49. Lambert, R. (2001), “Contracting theory and accounting”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 3-87.
50. Laughlin, R. (1995), “Methodological themes – empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for ‘middle-range’ thinking”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 63-87.
51. Lazear, E.P. (2000), “Economic imperialism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, pp. 99-146.
52. Llewellyn, S. and Northcott, D. (2005), “The average hospital”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 555-83.
53. Luft, J. and Shields, M. (2002), “Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research”, The European Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 795-803.
54. Lukka, K. (2007), “Management accounting change and stability: loosely coupled rules and routines in action”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 76-101.
55. Lukka, K. and Kasanen, E. (1995), “The problem of generalizability: anecdotes and evidence in accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 71-90.
56. Lumijärvi, O-P. (1990), Gameplaying in Capital Budgeting, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, Series A-7.
57. McKinnon, J. (1988), “Reliability and validity in field research: some strategies and tactics”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 34-54.
58. Macher, M. (1987), “The use of relative performance evaluation in organizations”, in Burns, W. Jr and Kaplan, R. (Eds), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 295-315.
59. Machlup, F. (1967), “Theories of the firm: marginalist, behavioral, managerial”, American Economic Review, reprinted in Microeconomics – Selected Readings, Mansfield, E. (Eds), 4th ed., 1982. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, pp. 93-108.
60. Macintosh, N. and Scapens, R. (1990), “Structuration theory in management accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 455-77.
61. Major, M. and Hopper, T. (2005), “Managers divided: implementing ABC in a Portuguese telecommunications company”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 16, pp. 205-29.
62. Malmi, T. (1997), “Towards explaining activity-based costing failure: accounting and control in a decentralized organization”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 459-80.
63. Malmi, T. and Granlund, M. (2006), “In search of management accounting theory”, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Accounting Association, Dublin, March.
64. Markus, M. and Pfeffer, J. (1983), “Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8, pp. 205-18.
65. Merchant, K. (1987), “How and why firms disregard the controllability principle?”, in Bruns, W. Jr and Kaplan, R. (Eds), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 316-38.
66. Merchant, K. and van der Stede, W. (2003), Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives, Pearson Education, Harlow.
67. Miller, P. and O'Leary, T. (1987), “Accounting and the construction of the governable person”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12, pp. 235-65.
68. Miller, P. and O'Leary, T. (1994), “Accounting, “economic citizenship” and the spatial reordering of manufacture”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 15-43.
69. Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
70. Mintzberg, H. and Westley, F. (2001), “Decision making: it's not what you think”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 89-93.
71. Modell, S. (2005), “Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: an assessment of validity implications”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 16, pp. 231-54.
72. Scapens, R. (1990), “Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study methods”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 22, pp. 259-81.
73. Scapens, R. and Roberts, J. (1993), “Accounting and control: a case study of resistance to accounting change”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 4, pp. 1-32.
74. Simons, R. (1987), “Planning, control and uncertainty: a process view”, in Burns, W. Jr and Kaplan, R. (Eds), Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 339-62.
75. Simons, R. (1991), “Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 49-62.
76. Vaivio, J. (1999a), “Examining ‘the quantified customer’”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, pp. 689-715.
77. Vaivio, J. (1999b), “Exploring a ‘non-financial’ management accounting change”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 409-37.
78. Vaivio, J. (2005), “‘Strategic’ non-financial measurement in an organizational context: a critique”, Accounting in Scandinavia – The Northern Lights, Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, Kristianstad.
79. Vaivio, J. (2006), “The accounting of ‘the meeting’: examining calculability within a ‘fluid’ local space”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31, pp. 735-62.
80. Vaivio, J. and Kokko, T. (2006), “Counting big: re-examining the concept of the bean counter controller”, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 49-74.
81. Wickramasinghe, D. and Hopper, T. (2005), “A cultural political economy of management accounting controls: a case study of a textile mill in a traditional Sinhalese village”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 16, pp. 473-503.
82. Young, S. and Selto, F. (1993), “Explaining cross-sectional workgroup performance differences in a JIT facility: a critical appraisal of a field-based study”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Fall, pp. 300-26.