Mesophilic batch anaerobic co-digestion of fruit-juice industrial waste and municipal waste sludge: Process and cost-benefit analysis

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 152, Issue , 2014, Pages 66-73

  Hosseini Koupaie, E ^a   Barrantes Leiva, M ^a   Eskicioglu, C ^a   Dutil, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Batch anaerobic co digestion; Cost benefit analysis; Fruit juice industrial waste; Municipal waste; Process evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FRUITS; INDUSTRIAL WASTES; METHANE; PULP DIGESTERS; RATE CONSTANTS; SLUDGE DIGESTION;

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; BIODEGRADATION RATE; BIOGAS AND METHANES; FIRST-ORDER REACTION MODEL; MUNICIPAL SLUDGE; MUNICIPAL WASTE; PROCESS EVALUATION; WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS; HEAVY METAL; METHANE;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUBSTRATE;

ACETOGENESIS; ACIDOGENESIS; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FRUIT JUICE; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METHANOGENESIS; MUNICIPAL SLUDGE CAKE; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREEN CAKE; THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

BATCH ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FRUIT-JUICE INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MUNICIPAL WASTE; PROCESS EVALUATION;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BEVERAGES; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FRUIT; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; KINETICS; METHANE; SEWAGE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 84888404522     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.072     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alatriste-Mondragon F., Samar P., Cox H.H., Ahring B.K., Iranpour R. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal, farm and industrial organic wastes: a survey of recent literature. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78:607-636.
2. Alkaya E., Demirer G.N. Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sugar-beet processing wastewater and beet-pulp in batch reactors. Renewable Energy 2011, 36:971-975.
3. Amor C., Lucas M.S., Pirra A.J., Peres J.A. Treatment of concentrated fruit juice wastewater by the combination of biological and chemical processes. J. Environ. Sci. Health. A 2012, 47:1809-1817.
4. Angelidaki I., Alves M., Bolzonella D., Borzacconi L., Campos J.L., Guwy A.J., Kalyuzhnyi S., Jenicek P., van Lier J.B. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Wat. Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:927-934.
5. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, APHA A., WPCF, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. 20th ed.
6. Coelho N.M.G., Droste R.L., Kennedy K.J. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge. Water Res. 2011, 45:2822-2834.
7. Crowe M., Nolan K., Collins C., Carty G., Donlon B., Kristoffersen M. Biodegradable Municipal Waste Management in Europe 2001, European Topic Centre on Waste, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
8. Droste R.L. Theory and Practice of Water and Wastewater Treatment 1996, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Canada.
9. Eskicioglu C., Ghorbani M. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of bioethanol plant whole stillage in batch mode. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:1682-1687.
10. Eskicioglu C., Kennedy K.J., Droste R.L. Characterization of soluble organic matter of waste activated sludge before and after thermal pretreatment. Water Res. 2006, 40:3725-3736.
11. Estevez M.M., Linjordet R., Morken J. Effects of steam explosion and co-digestion in the methane production from Salix by mesophilic batch assays. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104:749-756.
12. Hogg D., Favoino E., Nielsen N., Thompson J., Wood K., Penschke A., Economides D., Papageorgiou S. Economic Analysis of Options for Managing Biodegradable Municipal Waste 2000, Final Report to the European Commission, Bristol, UK.
13. Liang J.B., Suzuki S., Kawamura A., Habasaki A., Kato T. Opportunities and challenges of converting biogas from pig farms into renewable energy in developing countries in Asia-A Malaysian experience. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 2008, 48:54-59.
14. Lin Y., Wang D., Liang J., Li G. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of pulp and paper sludge and food waste for methane production in a fed-batch basis. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33:2627-2633.
15. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse 2003, Metcalf, Eddy, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
16. Miron Y., Zeeman G., van Lier J., Lettinga G. The role of sludge retention time in the hydrolysis and acidification of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins during digestion of primary. Water Res. 2000, 34:1705-1713.
17. Moody, L., Burns, R., Wu-Haan, W., Spajic, R., 2009. Use of biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays for predicting and enhancing anaerobic digester performance. In: 44th Croatian & 4th International Symposium on Agriculture. Optija, Croatia. pp. 930-934.
18. Neves L., Oliveira R., Alves M.M. Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 2004, 39:2019-2024.
19. Ni J.Q., Naveau H., Nynst E.J. Biogas: exploitation of a renewable energy in Latin America. Renew. Energy 1993, 3:763-779.
20. Owen W.F., Stuckey D.C., Healy J.B., Young L.Y., McCarty P.L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. 1979, 13:485-592.
21. Puchajda B., Oleszkiewicz J. Thermophilic anaerobic acid digestion of biosolids: hydrolysis, acidification and optimization of retention time of acid digestion. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2006, 5:187-195.
22. Saha M., Eskicioglu C., Marin J. Microwave, ultrasonic and chemo-mechanical pretreatments for enhancing methane potential of pulp mill wastewater treatment sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7815-7826.
23. Smith A., Brown K., Ogilvie S., Rushton K., Bates J. Waste Management Options and Climate Change. Final Report to the European Commission 2001, DG Environment, Brussels, Belgium.
24. Sung S., Dague R.R. Laboratory studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Water Environ. Res. 1995, 67:294-301.
25. Tiehm A., Nickel K., Zellhorn M., Neis U. Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Res. 2001, 35:2003-2009.
26. Tiquia S.M., Richard T.L., Honeyman M.S. Carbon, nutrient and mass loss during composting. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2002, 62:15-24.
27. Tsilemou K., Panagiotakopoulos D. Approximate cost functions for solid waste treatment facilities. Waste Manage. Res. 2006, 24:310-322.
28. Vavilin V.A., Rytov S.V., Lokshina L.Y., Pavlostathis S.G., Barlaz M.A. Distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion: effects of leachate recirculation and pH adjustment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 81:66-73.
29. Weemaes M.P.J., Verstraete W.H. Review evaluation of current wet sludge disintegration techniques. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 73:83-92.
30. Xie S., Lawlor P.G., Frost J.P., Hu Z., Zhan X. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:5728-5733.
31. Zhang Y., Banks C.J. Impact of different particle size distributions on anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2012, 33:297-307.