CT radiation dose: Current controversies and dose reduction strategies

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 201, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1283-1290

  Costello, Justin E ^a   Cecava, Nathan D ^a   Tucker, Jonathan E ^a   Bau, Jennifer L ^a  

^a WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

CT; Dose reduction strategies; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; BISMUTH BREAST SHIELDING; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE RESPONSE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IONIZING RADIATION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; MULTIPHASE CT EXAMINATION; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION INDUCED NEOPLASM; RADIATION SHIELD; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REPETITIVE CT SCANNING; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUBE POTENTIAL;

BODY BURDEN; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84888362887     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9720     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2071-2077.
2. Wang SS. CT scans linked to cancer. Wall Street Journal online.wsj.com/article/SB126082398582691047. html#CX. Published December 15, 2009. Accessed July 1, 2012.
3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277-2284.
4. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources- 1950-2007. Radiology 2009; 253:520-531.
5. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:141-146.
6. Ladapo JA, Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, et al. Cost effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR 2008; 191:455-463.
7. Scaglione M, Pinto A, Pedrosa I, Sparano A, Romano L. Multi-detector row computed tomography and blunt chest trauma. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65:377-388.
8. Verdun FR, Bochud F, Aroua A, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Radiation risk: what you should tell your patients. RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1807-1816.
9. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation; National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
10. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. www.aapm.org/org/policies/ details.asp?id=318&type=PP Published December 13, 2011. Accessed July 1, 2012.
11. Health Physics Society. Radiation risk in perspective: position statement of the Health Physics Society (adopted January 1996). In: Health Physics Society directory and handbook, 1998-1999. McLean, VA: Health Physics Society, 1998.
12. Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009; 251:13-22.
13. American College of Radiology. ACR statement on recent studies regarding CT scans and increased cancer risk. www.acr.org/About-Us/Media-Center/Position- Statements/Position-Statements-Folder/ACR-Statement-on-Recent-Studies-Regarding- CTScans-and-Increased-Cancer-Risk. Published December 15, 2009. Accessed July 1, 2012.
14. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radiationemitting products: what are the radiation risks from CT? Risk estimates from medical imaging. www.fda.gov/radiationemittingproducts/radiationemittingproductsandprocedures/ medicalimaging/medicalx-rays/ucm115329.htm. Updated August 6, 2009. Accessed July 1, 2012.
15. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Report to the General Assembly. Volume I. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York, NY: United Nations, 2000.
16. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1990; 21:1-201.
17. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380:499-505.
18. American Association of Physicists in Medicine website. CT scans are an important diagnostic tool when used appropriately. www.aapm.org/publicgeneral/ CTScansImportantDiagnosticTool.asp. Published June 7, 2012. Accessed July 1, 2012.
19. Meer AB, Basu PA, Baker LC, Atlas SW. Exposure to ionizing radiation and estimate of secondary cancers in the era of high-speed CT scanning: projections in the Medicare population. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9:245-250.
20. McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? AJR 2010; 194:890-896.
21. Shrimpton P. Assessment of patient dose in CT. In: European guidelines for multislice computed tomography funded by the European Commission 2004: contract number FIGMCT2000-20078- CT-TIP. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: European Commission, 2004.
22. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- And age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010; 257:158-166.
23. Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Image Gently website. www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/igAccessed July 1, 2012.
24. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology 2008; 248:254-263.
25. National Cancer Institute website. SEER cancer statistics review 1975-2009: lifetime risk (percent) of being diagnosed with cancer by site and race/ethnicity-18 SEER areas 2007-2009, males (table 1.15) and females (table 1.16). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2009-pops09/results-merged/topic- lifetime-risk-diagnosis.pdfAccessed June 20, 2013.
26. National Cancer Institute website. SEER cancer statistics review 1975-2009: lifetime risk (percent) of dying from cancer by site and race/ethnicity- Total U.S. 2007-2009-males (table 1.18) and females (table 1.19). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2009-pops09/results-merged/topic- lifetime-risk-death.pdf Accessed June 20, 2013.
27. Huda W. What ER radiologists need to know about radiation risks. Emerg Radiol 2009; 16:335-341.
28. Donnelly LF. Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR 2005; 184:655-657.
29. American College of Radiology website. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria. Accessed July 1, 2012.
30. Campbell J, Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, Shepard J. Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic current modulation. AJR 2005; 185:1525-1530.
31. Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W, et al. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A review. AJR 2008; 190:335-343.
32. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004; 230:619-628.
33. Wintersperger B, Jacobs T, Herzog P, et al. Aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:334-341.
34. Szucs-Farkas Z, Schibler F, Cullmann J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary CT angiography at low tube voltage: individual comparison of a normal-dose protocol at 120kVp and a low-dose protocol at 80kVp using reduced amount of contrast in a simulation study. AJR 2011; 197:[web] W852-W859.
35. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 2006; 241:899-907.
36. Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 2003; 226:762-772.
37. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004; 233:649-657.
38. Greess H, Nomayr A, Wolf H, et al. Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation- based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE dose). Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1571-1576.
39. Singh S, Mannudeep KK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. Automatic exposure control in CT: Applications and limitations. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8:446-449.
40. Duan X, Wang J, Christner JA, Leng S, Grant KL, McCollough CH. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. AJR 2011; 197:689-695.
41. Livingstone RS, Dinakaran PM, Cherian RS, Eapen A. Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations. J Med Phys 2009; 34:217-222.
42. Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, et al. Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. Radiology 2005; 237:303-308.
43. Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, et al. Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. AJR 2006; 186:673-679.
44. Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005; 237:213-223.
45. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR 2010; 195:1095-1099.
46. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: Application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR 2010; 194:191-199.
47. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR 2009; 193:764-771.
48. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A pilot study. Radiology 2011; 259:565-573.
49. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, TenHave TR, Weaver JS. The breast: in-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT-shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology 1997; 205:853-858.
50. Geleijns J, Salvado Artells M, Veldkamp WJ, Lopez Tortosa M, Calzado Cantera A. Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:2334-2340.
51. McCollough CH, Wang J, Gould RG, Orton CG. Point/counterpoint: The use of bismuth breast shields for CT should be discouraged. Med Phys 2012; 39:2321-2324.
52. Kalra MK, Dang P, Singh S, Saini S, Shepard JA. In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance. Korean J Radiol 2009; 10:156-163.
53. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 2001; 176:289-296.
54. Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. Pointers for optimizing radiation dose in pediatric CT protocols. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9:77-79.
55. Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology 2004; 233:515-522.
56. Kim JE, Newman B. Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT. AJR 2010; 194:1188-1193.
57. Goo HW, Suh DS. Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECG-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36:344-351.
58. Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS, Lowry C. Improved pediatric multidetector body CT protocols using size-based color-coded format. AJR 2002; 178:721-726.
59. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 2009; 252:200-208.
60. Yu L, Bruesewitz MR, Thomas KB, Fletcher JG, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2011; 31:835-848.
61. Wiest PW, Locken JA, Heintz PH, Mettler FA. CT scanning: A major source of radiation exposure. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002; 23:402-410.
62. Broder J, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 2006; 13:25-30.
63. Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR 2009; 192:887-892.
64. Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP. Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR 2006; 186:1120-1124.
65. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR 2002; 178:379-387.
66. Hamm M, Knopfle E, Wartenberg S, Wawrosheck F, Weckermann D, Harzmann R. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol 2002; 167:1687-1691.
67. Heneghan JP, McGuire KA, Leder RA, DeLong DM, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC. Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of nonconventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. Radiology 2003; 229:575-580.
68. Guite KM, Hinshaw JL, Ranallo FN, Lindstrom MJ, Lee FT. Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT: unindicated multiphase scans are an important source of medically unnecessary exposure. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8:756-761.
69. Lokken RP, Sadow CA, Silverman SG. Diagnostic yield of CT urography in the evaluation of young adults with hematuria. AJR 2012; 198:609-615.
70. Maher MM, Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Mueller PR, Saini S. Multidetector CT urography in imaging of the urinary tract in patients with hematuria. Korean J Radiol 2004; 5:1-10.
71. Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, et al. CT urography: definition, indications, and techniques-a guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:4-17.
72. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:272-284.
73. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF; American College of Radiology. ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: Three years later. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7:865-870.