Soil flushing: A review of the origin of efficiency variability

Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 379-389

  Atteia, O ^a   Del Campo Estrada, E ^b   Bertin, H ^b  

^a EA   (France)

^b University Bordeaux I2M UMR CNRS 5295   (France)

Author keywords

Chlorinated solvents; NAPL; Soil flushing; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888315908     PISSN: 15691705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-013-9316-0     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Abriola LM, Drummond CD, Hahn EJ et al (2005) Pilot-scale demonstration of surfactant-enhanced PCE solubilization at the bachman road site. 1. Site characterization and test design. Environ Sci Technol 39: 1778-1790.
2. Bettahar M, Ducreux J, Schäfer G et al (1999) Surfactant enhanced in situ remediation of LNAPL contaminated aquifers: large scale studies on a controlled experimental site. Transp Porous Media 37: 255-276.
3. Blanford WJ, Barackrnan ML, Boing TB et al (2001) Cyclodextrin-enhanced vertical flushing of a trichloroethene contaminated aquifer. Groundw Monit Remediat 21: 58-66.
4. Brooks MC, Annable MD, Rao PS et al (2004) Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing. J Contam Hydrol 69: 281-297.
5. Chai JL, Gao YH, Zhao KS et al (2005) Studies on the phase properties of Winsor I-III type micro emulsions with dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. Chin Chem Lett 16: 1263.
6. Chevalier LR (2003) Surfactant dissolution and mobilization of LNAPL contaminants in aquifers. Environ Monit Assess 84: 19-33.
7. Childs JD, Acosta E, Knox R et al (2004) Improving the extraction of tetrachloroethylene from soil columns using surfactant gradient systems. J Contam Hydrol 71: 27-45.
8. Childs J, Acosta E, Annable MD et al (2006) Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced solubilization of DNAPL at dover air force base, Delaware. J Contam Hydrol 82: 1-22.
9. Dwarakanath V, Pope GA (2000) Surfactant phase behavior with field degreasing solvent. Environ Sci Technol 34: 4842-4848.
10. Elgh-Dalgren K, Arwidsson Z, Camdzija A, Sjöberg R, Ribé V, Waar S, Allard B, von Kronhelm T, van Hees P (2009) Laboratory and pilot scale soil washing of PAH and arsenic from a wood preservation site: changes in concentration and toxicity. J Hazard Mat 172: 1033-1040.
11. Falta RW, Lee CM, Brame SE et al (1999) Field test of high molecular weight alcohol flushing for subsurface nonaqueous phase liquid remediation. Water Resour Res 35: 2095-2108.
12. Fountain JC, Starr RC, Middleton T et al (1996) A controlled field test of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation. Groundw 34: 910-916.
13. Grubb DG, Sitar N (1999) Mobilization of trichloroethene (TCE) during ethanol flooding in uniform and layered sand packs under confined conditions. Water Resour Res 35: 3275-3289.
14. Hirasaki GJ, Miller CA, Szafranski R, Tanzil D, Lawson JB, Mainardus H, Jin M, Londergan JT, Jackson RE, Pope GA, Wade WH (1997) Field demonstration of the surfactant/foam process for aquifer remediation. SPE annual technical conference San Antonio, Texas, 5-8 Oct 1997.
15. Jawitz JW, Sillan RK, Annable MD et al (2000) In-situ alcohol flushing of a DNAPL source zone at a dry cleaner site. Environ Sci Technol 34: 3722-3729.
16. Jawitz JW, Annable MD, Rao PS et al (2001) Evaluation of remediation performance and cost for field scale single-phase micro emulsion (SPME) flushing. J Environ Sci Health Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 36: 1437-1450.
17. Jeong S-W, Ju B-K, Lee B-J (2009) Effects of alcohol-partitioning type and airflow on cosolvent flooding to benzene-LNAPL saturated porous media. J Hazard Mater 166: 603-611.
18. Kaye AJ, Cho J, Basu NB et al (2008) Laboratory investigation of flux reduction from dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) partial source zone remediation by enhanced dissolution. J Contam Hydrol 102: 17-28.
19. Lee LS, Zhai X, Lee J (2006) INDOT guidance document for in situ soil flushing. Purdue e-Pubs. http://docs. lib. purdue. edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=2578&context=jtrp. Accessed 4 March 2013.
20. Londergan JT, Meinardus HW, Mariner PE et al (2001) DNAPL removal from a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer by surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation. Groundw Monit Remediat 21: 57-67.
21. Martel R, Gélinas PJ, Saumure L (1998) Aquifer washing by micellar solutions: 3 field test at the Thouin Sand Pit (L'Assomption, Quebec, Canada). J Contam Hydrol 30: 33-48.
22. Martel R, Hébert A, Levebvre R et al (2004) Displacement and sweep efficiencies in a DNAPL recovery test using micellar and polymer solutions injected in a five-spot pattern. J Contam Hydrol 75: 1-29.
23. McCray JE, Brusseau ML (1998) Cyclodextrin-enhanced in situ flushing of multiple-component immiscible organic liquid contamination at the field scale: mass removal effectiveness. Environ Sci Technol 32: 1285-1293.
24. McCray JE, Tick GR, Jawitz JW et al (2011) Remediation of NAPL source zones: lessons learned from field studies at Hill and Dover AFB. Groundw 49: 727-744.
25. Mulligan CN, Eftekhari F (2003) Remediation with surfactant foam of PCP-contaminated soil. Eng Geol 70: 269-279.
26. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Eng Geol 60: 371-380.
27. Petitgirard A, Djehiche M, Persello J, Fievet P, Fatin-Rouge N (2009) PAH contaminated soil remediation by reusing an aqueous solution of cyclodextrins. Chemosphere 75: 714-718.
28. Ramsburg CA, Pennell KD, Kibbey TC et al (2004) Refinement of the density-modified displacement method for efficient treatment of tetrachloroethene source zones. J Contam Hydrol 74: 105-131.
29. Ramsburg CA, Pennell KD, Abriola LM et al (2005) Pilot-scale demonstration of surfactant-enhanced PCE solubilization at the bachman road site. 2. System operation and evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 39: 1791-1801.
30. Robert T, Martel R, Conrad SH et al (2006) Visualization of TCE recovery mechanisms using surfactant-polymer solutions in a two-dimensional heterogeneous sand model. J Contam Hydrol 86: 3-31.
31. Roote DS (1998) Technology status report: in situ flushing. Ground Water Remediation Technology Analysis Center (available at http://www. gwrtac. org).
32. Rosas JM, Vicente F, Santos A, Romero A (2013) Soil remediation using soil washing followed by Fenton oxidation. Chem Eng J 220: 125-132.
33. Rothmel RK, Peters RW, St. Martin E et al (1998) Surfactant foam/bioaugmentation technology for in situ treatment of TCE-DNAPLs. Environ Sci Technol 32: 1667-1675.
34. Roy D, Kommalapati RR, Valsaraj KT et al (1995) Soil flushing of residual transmission fluid: application of colloidal gas aphron suspensions and conventional surfactant solutions. Water Res 29: 589-595.
35. Sale T, Piontek K, Pitts M (1989) Chemically enhanced in situ soil washing. National Ground Water Association. http://info. ngwa. org/gwol/pdf/890149232. PDF. Accessed 4 March 2013.
36. Sebba F (1971) Microfoams-an unexploited colloid system. J Colloid Interface Sci 35: 643-646.
37. Suchomel EJ, Pennell KD (2006) Reductions in contaminant mass discharge following partial mass removal from DNAPL source zones. Environ Sci Technol 40: 6110-6116.
38. Suresh P, Rao C, Annable MD et al (1997) Field-scale evaluation of in situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation. Water Resour Res 33: 2673-2686.
39. Zhang C, Werth CJ, Webb AG (2008) Investigation of surfactant-enhanced mass removal and flux reduction in 3D correlated permeability fields using magnetic resonance imaging. J Contam Hydrol 100: 116-126.