Concordance between vacuum assisted biopsy and postoperative histology: Implications for the proposed Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS)

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1337-1340

  Soumian, S ^a,b   Verghese, E T ^c   Booth, M ^c   Sharma, N ^c   Chaudhri, S ^a   Bradley, S ^a   Umranikar, S ^a   Millican Slater, R A ^c   Hanby, A M ^c,d   Francis, A ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Concordance; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Mammotome; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LOW RISK DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR INVASION; UNITED KINGDOM; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

BREAST CANCER; CONCORDANCE; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN-SITU; MAMMOTOME; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VACUUM;

EID: 84888298994     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. L. Fallowfield, A. Francis, S. Catt, M. Mackenzie, and V. Jenkins Time for a low-risk DCIS trial: harnessing public and patient involvement Lancet Oncol 13 12 2012 1183 1185
2. CRUK. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/; 2012 [cited].
3. WMCIUaNCS. P. All breast cancer report: a UK analysis of all symptomatic and screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed in 2006. NHS cancer screening programmes.
4. N. Bijker, J.L. Peterse, and L. Duchateau Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853 J Clin Oncol - Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 19 2001 2263 2271
5. K.J. Jorgensen, and P.C. Gotzsche Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends BMJ 339 2009 b2587
6. K.J. Jorgensen, and P.C. Gotzsche Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme J R Soc Med 103 1 2010 14 20
7. H.G. Welch, S. Woloshin, and L.M. Schwartz The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ - the price of screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 100 4 2008 228 229
8. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review Lancet 380 2012 1778 1786
9. A. Bleyer, and H.G. Welch Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence N Engl J Med 367 2012 1998 2005
10. J.A. Lane, F.C. Hamdy, R.M. Martin, E.L. Turner, D.E. Neal, and J.L. Donovan Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and protect studies Eur J Cancer 2010 3095 3101 [England: 2010 Elsevier Ltd]
11. W.E. Burak Jr., K.E. Owens, and M.B. Tighe Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions Arch Surg 135 2000 700 703 [Chicago, Ill: 1960]
12. U. Kettritz, K. Rotter, and I. Schreer Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study Cancer 100 2 2004 245 251
13. L.E. Philpotts, C.H. Lee, L.J. Horvath, R.C. Lange, D. Carter, and I. Tocino Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 2000 1047 1050
14. N. Houssami, S. Ciatto, I. Ellis, and D. Ambrogetti Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates Cancer 109 3 2007 487 495
15. D.M. Parham, D. Coleman, and S. Kodikara The NHS breast screening programme (pathology) EQA: experience in recent years relating to issues involved in individual performance appraisal J Clin Pathol 59 2 2006 130 137
16. S.E. Pinder, C. Duggan, and I.O. Ellis A new pathological system for grading DCIS with improved prediction of local recurrence: results from the UKCCCR/ANZ DCIS trial Br J Cancer 103 1 2010 94 100