Flagellar apparatus structure of choanocyte in Sycon sp. and its significance for phylogeny of Porifera

Zoomorphology

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 351-357

  Pozdnyakov, Igor R ^a   Karpov, Sergey A ^a,b  

^a ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Calcarea; Choanocytes; Kinetid structure; Sponges; Sycon

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CALCAREA; CHOANOFLAGELLIDA; CORTICIUM CANDELABRUM; HOMOSCLEROMORPHA; METAZOA; PORIFERA; SYCON;

EID: 84888292106     PISSN: 0720213X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00435-013-0193-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Farmer M et al (2005) The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. J Eukaryot Microbiol 52: 399-451.
2. Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Lane CE et al (2012) The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes. J Eukaryot Microbiol 59: 429-493.
3. Amano S, Hori I (2001) Metamorphosis of coeloblastula performed by multipotential larval flagellated cells in the calcareous sponge Leucosolenia laxa. Biol Bull 200: 20-32.
4. Borchiellini C, Chombard C, Manuel M, Alivon E, Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N (2004) Molecular phylogeny of Demospongiae: implications for classification and scenarios of character evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 32: 823-837.
5. Boury-Esnault N, De Vos L, Donadey C, Vacelet J (1984) Comparative study of the choanosome of Porifera I. the homoscleromorpha. J Morphol 180: 3-17.
6. Brill B (1973) Untersuchungen zur Ultrastruktur der Choanocyte von Ephydatia fluviatilis L. Z Zellforsch 144: 231-245.
7. Dohrmann M, Voigt O, Erpenbeck D, Wörheide G et al (2006) Non-monophyly of most supraspecific taxa of calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) revealed by increased taxon sampling and partitioned Bayesian analysis of ribosomal DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40: 830-843.
8. Eerkes-Medrano DI, Leys SP (2006) Ultrastructure and embryonic development of a syconoid calcareous sponge. Invert Biol 125: 177-194.
9. Erpenbeck D, Wörheide G (2007) On the molecular phylogeny of sponges (Porifera). Zootaxa 1668: 107-126.
10. Efremova SM, Sukhodolskaya AN, Alekseeva NP (1988) The different structure of kinetosome rootlet systems in flagellated cells of the larvae and the choanocytes of sponges. In: Koltun BM, Stepaniants CD (eds). Porifera and Cnidaria. Modern and Perspective Investigations. Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, Zoological institute. pp 22-23 (in Russian).
11. Ereskovsky AV, Tokina DB, Bezac C, Boury-Esnault N (2007) Metamorphosis of Cinctoblastula Larvae (Homoscleromorpha, Porifera). J Morph 268: 518-528.
12. Gonobobleva E, Maldonado M (2009) Choanocyte Ultrastructure in Halisarca dujardini (Demospongiae, Halisarcida). J Morph 270: 615-627.
13. Hartman WD, Willenz P (1990) Organization of the choanosome of three Caribbean sclerosponges. In: Rützler K (ed) New perspectives in sponge biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 228-236.
14. James-Clark H (1868) On the spongia ciliata as Infusoria flagellata. Ann Mag Nat Hist 1: 133-142, 188-215, 250-264.
15. Karpov SA (2000) Flagellate phylogeny: ultrastructural approach. In: Leadbeater BSC, Green JC (eds) The flagellates. Systematics Association Special Publications London, Taylor & Francis, pp 336-360.
16. Karpov SA, Efremova SM (1994) Ultrathin structure of the flagellar apparatus in the choanocyte of the sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis. Tsitologia 36: 403-408 (in Russian).
17. Karpov SA, Leadbeater BSC (1998) Cytoskeleton structure and composition in choanoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 45: 361-367.
18. Kilian EF (1954) Die feinstruktur des kragen bei den choanocyten der spongilliden. Ber Oberhess Gesellesch Natur Heilk Giessen. N F Naturw Abt 27: 85-89.
19. King N (2004) The unicellular ancestry of animal development. Dev Cell 7: 313-325.
20. Maldonado M (2004) Choanoflagellates, choanocytes, and animal multicellularity. Invert Biol 123: 1-22.
21. Maldonado M (2009) Embryonic development of verongid demosponges supports the independent acquisition of spongin skeletons as an alternative to the siliceous skeleton of sponges. Biol J Linn Soc 97: 427-447.
22. Manuel M (2006) Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges. Can J Zool 84: 225-241.
23. Manuel M, Borchiellini C, Alivon E, Le Parco Y, Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N (2003) Phylogeny and evolution of calcareous sponges: monophyly of Calcinea and Calcaronea, high level of morphological homoplasy, and the primitive nature of axial symmetry. Syst Biol 52: 311-333.
24. Mehl D, Reiswig HM (1991) The presence of flagellar vanes in choanomeres of Porifera and their possible phylogenetic implications. Z Zool Syst Evol Forsch 29: 312-319.
25. Muricy G, Bézac C, Gallissian M-F, Boury-Esnault N (1999) Anatomy, cytology and symbiotic bacteria of four Mediterranean species of Plakina Schulze, 1880 (Demospongiae, Homosclerophorida). J Nat Hist 33: 159-176.
26. Philippe H, Derelle R, Lopez P et al (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol 19: 706-712.
27. Rasmont R (1959) L'ultrastructure des choanocytes d'éponges. Ann Sci Nat Zool 12: 253-262.
28. Simpson TL (1984) The cell biology of sponges. Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Vacelet J, Boury-Esnault N, De Vos L, Donadey C (1989) Comparative study of the choanosome of Porifera: the keratose sponges. J Morphol 201: 119-129.
30. Watanabe Y (1978) Structure and formation of the collar in choanocytes of Tetilla serica (Lebwohl), Demospongiae. Dev Growth Differ 38: 71-74.
31. Willmer P (1991) Invertebrate Relationships. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Patterns in Animal Evolution.
32. Woollacott RM, Pinto RL (1995) Flagellar basal apparatus and its utility in phylogenetic analyses of the Porifera. J Morph 226: 247-265.