Magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative frozen sectioning for the evaluation of risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1411-1416

  Hahn, Ho Suap ^a   Song, Heung Seop ^a   Lee, In Ho ^a   Kim, Tae Jin ^a   Lee, Ki Heon ^a   Shim, Jae Uk ^a   Kim, Jae Wook ^a   Lim, Kyung Taek ^a  

^a Kwandong University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endometrial Cancer; Frozen section; Lymph node metastasis; MRI; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LOW RISK POPULATION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84888251797     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a580d3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277-300.
2. Lee S, Kim J, Park N, et al. Contemporary trends of endometrial cancer in Korean women. Korean J Gynecol Oncol. 2005;16: 215-220.
3. Mikuta JJ. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of endometrial cancer 1988. Cancer. 1993; 71:1460-1463.
4. Creasman WY, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987;60:2035-2041.
5. Moore DH, Fowler WC, Walton LA, et al. Morbidity of lymph node sampling in cancers of the uterine corpus and cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:180-184.
6. Abu Freij M, Saleh H, Rawlins H, et al. The use of MRI for selecting patients with endometrial cancer and significant co-morbidities for vaginal hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:1097-1101.
7. Vasconcelos C, Felix A, Cunha TM. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation. J Obstet Gyncol. 2007;26:65-70.
8. Celik C, Ozdemir S, Kiresi D, et al. Evaluation of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;30:302-307.
9. Loubeyre P, Undurraga M, Bodmer, A et al. Non-invasive modalities for predicting lymph node spread in early stage endometrial cancer. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e102-e108.
10. Cho H, Kim YT, Kim JH, et al. Accuracy of preoperative tests in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: the importance of lymphadenectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89: 175-181.
11. Ghaemmaghami F, Aminimoghaddam S, Modares-Gilani M, et al. Assessment of gross examination and frozen section of uterine specimen in endometrial cancer patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282:685-689.
12. Kucera E, Va'clav H, Radovan T, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section during laparoscopic management of early endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009; 30:408-411.
13. Ugaki H, Kimura T, Miyatake T, et al. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of myometrial invasion and histology of endometrial cancer using the revised FIGO staging system. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:1180-1184.
14. Yanazume S, Saito T, Eto T, et al. Reassessment of the utility of frozen sections in endometrial cancer surgery using tumor diameter as an additional factor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204:531.
15. Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, et al. The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21912.
16. Case AS, Rocconi RP, Straughn JM Jr, et al. A prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1375-1379.
17. Shim JU, Rose PG, Reale FR, et al. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis at surgery in clinical stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1335-1338.
18. Foti PV, Farina R, Coronella M, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: MR staging and causes of error. Radiol Med. 2013;118:487-503.
19. The writing committee of behalf of the ASTEC study group. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet. 2009;373:125-136.
20. Benedetti-Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1707-1716.
21. Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, et al. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1165-1172.
22. Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Spannuth W, et al. Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:291-294.