Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: Where are they processed in the brain?

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 34-43

  Rémy, Florence ^a   Vayssière, Nathalie ^a   Pins, Delphine ^b,c   Boucart, Muriel ^b,c   Fabre Thorpe, Michèle ^a  

^a Brain and Cognition Research Center in Toulouse   (France)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Congruence; Contextual associations; FMRI; Natural scenes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FRONTAL LOBE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84888224356     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aminoff E., Gronau N., Bar M. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(7):1493-1503.
2. Andrews T.J., Clarke A., Pell P., Hartley T. Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 2009, 49(1):703-711.
3. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(8):617-629.
4. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38(2):347-358.
5. Bar M., Aminoff E., Ishai A. Famous faces activate contextual associations in the parahippocampal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(6):1233-1238.
6. Bar M., Aminoff E., Schacter D.L. Scenes unseen: The parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(34):8539-8544.
7. Bar M., Ullman S. Spatial context in recognition. Perception 1996, 25(3):343-352.
8. Biederman I. Perceiving real-world scenes. Science 1972, 177(4043):77-80.
9. Biederman I., Mezzanotte R.J., Rabinowitz J.C. Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14(2):143-177.
10. Blatt G.J., Pandya D.N., Rosene D.L. Parcellation of cortical afferents to three distinct sectors in the parahippocampal gyrus of the rhesus monkey: An anatomical and neurophysiological study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 2003, 466(2):161-179.
11. Brett, M., Anton, J. L., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J. B. (2002). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Paper presented at the 8th int conf on funct mapp of the hum brain.
12. Bunge S.A., Hazeltine E., Scanlon M.D., Rosen A.C., Gabrieli J.D. Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage 2002, 17(3):1562-1571.
13. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(3):713-731.
14. Chadick J.Z., Gazzaley A. Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14(7):830-832.
15. Chalfonte B.L., Johnson M.K. Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition 1996, 24(4):403-416.
16. Chun M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(5):170-178.
17. Cohen N.J., Ryan J., Hunt C., Romine L., Wszalek T., Nash C. Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies. Hippocampus 1999, 9(1):83-98.
18. Davenport J.L. Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35(3):393-401.
19. Davenport J.L., Potter M.C. Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science 2004, 15(8):559-564.
20. Diana R.A., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(9):379-386.
21. Epstein R.A., Ward E.J. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(2):294-303.
22. Fabre-Thorpe M. The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:243.
23. Ferrand L., New B., Brysbaert M., Keuleers E., Bonin P., Meot A., et al. The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42(2):488-496.
24. Fize D., Cauchoix M., Fabre-Thorpe M. Humans and monkeys share visual representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108(18):7635-7640.
25. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Price C.J., Buchel C., Worsley K.J. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 1999, 10(4):385-396.
26. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J.P., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping 1995, 2:189-210.
27. Ganis G., Kutas M. An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 16(2):123-144.
28. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(14):8301-8306.
29. Goh J.O., Siong S.C., Park D., Gutchess A., Hebrank A., Chee M.W. Cortical areas involved in object, background, and object-background processing revealed with functional magnetic resonance adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(45):10223-10228.
30. Green C., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(5):1107-1119.
31. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research 2001, 41(10-11):1409-1422.
32. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:649-677.
33. Gronau N., Neta M., Bar M. Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(3):371-388.
34. Henderson J.M., Larson C.L., Zhu D.C. Cortical activation to indoor versus outdoor scenes: An fMRI study. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 179(1):75-84.
35. Henke K., Weber B., Kneifel S., Wieser H.G., Buck A. Human hippocampus associates information in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(10):5884-5889.
36. Hock H.S., Romanski L., Galie A., Williams C.S. Real-world schemata and scene recognition in adults and children. Memory and Cognition 1978, 6(4):423-431.
37. Ishai A., Ungerleider L.G., Martin A., Schouten J.L., Haxby J.V. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1999, 96(16):9379-9384.
38. Jenkins L.J., Yang Y.J., Goh J., Hong Y.Y., Park D.C. Cultural differences in the lateral occipital complex while viewing incongruent scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2010, 5(2-3):236-241.
39. Joubert O.R., Fize D., Rousselet G.A., Fabre-Thorpe M. Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(13):11-18. (article no. 11).
40. Joubert O.R., Rousselet G.A., Fize D., Fabre-Thorpe M. Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference. Vision Research 2007, 47(26):3286-3297.
41. Kim J.G., Biederman I. Where do objects become scenes?. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 21(8):1738-1746.
42. Kret M.E., de Gelder B. Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 203(1):169-180.
43. Mandler J.M., Johnson N.S. Some of thousand words a picture is worth. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Learning and Memory 1976, 2(5):529-540.
44. McCarthy G., Luby M., Gore J., Goldman-Rakic P. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77(3):1630-1634.
45. Mechelli A., Price C.J., Friston K.J., Ishai A. Where bottom-up meets top-down: Neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(11):1256-1265.
46. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K., Raye C.L., Mather M., D'Esposito M. Aging and reflective processes of working memory: Binding and test load deficits. Psychology and Aging 2000, 15(3):527-541.
47. Mudrik L., Lamy D., Deouell L.Y. ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(2):507-517.
48. Noppeney U., Price C.J., Penny W.D., Friston K.J. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(3):437-445.
49. Oliva A., Torralba A. The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(12):520-527.
50. Palmer S.E. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition 1975, 3:519-526.
51. Park S., Chun M.M. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. Neuroimage 2009, 47(4):1747-1756.
52. Park S., Intraub H., Yi D.J., Widders D., Chun M.M. Beyond the edges of a view: Boundary extension in human scene-selective visual cortex. Neuron 2007, 54(2):335-342.
53. Poldrack R.A. Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2007, 2(1):67-70.
54. Rajimehr R., Devaney K.J., Bilenko N.Y., Young J.C., Tootell R.B. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biology 2010, 9(4):e1000608.
55. Strange B.A., Henson R.N., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Brain mechanisms for detecting perceptual, semantic, and emotional deviance. Neuroimage 2000, 12(4):425-433.
56. Suzuki W.A., Amaral D.G. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Cortical afferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1994, 350(4):497-533.
57. Suzuki W.A., Amaral D.G. Functional neuroanatomy of the medial temporal lobe memory system. Cortex 2004, 40(1):220-222.
58. Torralba A., Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Network 2003, 14(3):391-412.
59. Wager T.D., Nichols T.E. Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm. Neuroimage 2003, 18(2):293-309.