The population ecology and conservation of pterourus esperanza (insecta: Lepidoptera): An ancestral swallowtail butterfly in the northern sierra of oaxaca, Mexico

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 753-760

  Almaraz Almaraz, M E ^a   Leon Cortes J L ^a   Molina Martinez A ^a  

^a EL COLEGIO DE LA FRONTERA SUR   (Mexico)

Author keywords

autoecology; Chinantla; cloud forest; conservation; endemic

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BUTTERFLY; CLOUD FOREST; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDEMIC SPECIES; HABITAT CONSERVATION; POPULATION ECOLOGY;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; OAXACA;

ESPERANZA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIO; PAPILIONIDAE;

EID: 84888157757     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/AN12107     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anonymous. 2010. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Diario Ocial de la Federacio ́ n. Ocial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas deMé xico de ßora y fauna silvestres-Categorṍas de riesgo y especicaciones para su inclusió n, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo.
2. Anonymous. 2011. Instituto Nacional de Estadṍstica y Geografṍa (INEGI). Información nacional, por entidad federativa y municipios. (http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/default. aspxent-20).
3. Beirao, M. V., F. C. Campos-Neto., I. A. Pimenta, and A.V.L. Freitas. 2012. Population biology and natural history of Parides burchellanus (Papilionidae: Papilioninae: Troidini), an Endangered Brazilian Butterßy. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 105: 36-43.
4. Beutelspacher, C. R. 1975. Una especie nueva de Papilio L. (Papilionidae). Rev. Soc. Mex. Lepid. 1: 3-6.
5. Boehmer, F. J. 2011. Vulnerability of tropical montane rain forest ecosystems due to climate change, pp. 789-802. In H. G. Brauch, U. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, C. Mesjasz, P. Kameri-Mbote, N. C. Nehera, B. Chourou, and H. Krummenacher (eds.), Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
6. Bonebrake, T. C., L. C. Ponisio., C. L. Boggs, and P. R. Ehrlich. 2010. More than just indicators: a review of tropical butterßy ecology and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1831-1841.
7. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, NY.
8. Calderón-Aguilera, L. E., V. H. Rivera-Monroy, L. Porter-Bolland, A. Mart́nez-Yŕzar, L. B. Ladah, M. Mart́nez-Ramos, J. Alcocer, A. L. Santiago-Pérez, H. A. Hernández-Arana, V. M. Reyes-Gómez, et al. 2012. An assessment of natural and human disturbance effects on Mexican ecosystems: current trends and research gaps. Biodivers. Conserv. 21: 589-617.
9. Cayuela, L., D. J. Golicher, and J. M. Rey-Benayas. 2006. The extent, distribution, and fragmentation of vanishing montane cloud forest in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 38: 544-554.
10. Challenger, A. 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de Mé xico: pasado, presente y futuro, CONABIO. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mé xico, Agrupación Sierra Madre, Mexico City.
11. Collins, N. M., and M. G. Morris. 1985. Threatened swallowtail butterßies of the world: TheIUCNRed Data book. IUCN, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
12. Collins, N. M., and J. A. Thomas. 1991. The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic, London, United Kingdom.
13. De Jong, B.H.J., M. A. Cairns, P. K. Haggerty, N. Raḿrez-Marcial, S. Ochoa-Gaona, J. Mendoza-Vega, M. González-Espinosa, and I. March-Mifsut. 1999. Landuse change and carbon ßux between 1970Õs and 1990Õs in central highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Environ. Manage. 23: 373-385.
14. De la Maza, R. R. 1987. Mariposas mexicanas. Guṍa para su colecta y determinació n. Fondo de Cultura Econó mica, Mexico City.
15. Ehrlich, P. 1984. The structure and dynamics of butterßy populations, pp. 25-40. In R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery (eds.), The Biology of Butterßies, vol. 11. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Ellis, E. A., and L. Porter-Bolland. 2008. Is communitybased forest management more effective than protected areasAcomparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 256: 1971-1983.
17. Hancock, D. L. 1983. Classication of the Papilionidae (Lepidoptera): a phylogenetic approach. Smithersia 2: 1-48.
18. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
19. Hanski, I., and C. D. Thomas. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterßies. Biol. Conserv. 68: 167-180.
20. Hanski, I., M. Kuussaari, and M. Nieminen. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterßy Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75: 747-762.
21. Hanski, I., T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari, and G. Lei. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterßy in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21-28.
22. Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation, pp. 111-128. In P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb (eds.), Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom.
23. Hill, J. K., C. D. Thomas, and O. T. Lewis. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterßies: implications for metapopulation structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
24. INEGI. 2011. Información nacional, por entidad federativa y municipios. (http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/default.aspxent-20).
25. Lehnert, M. S. 2008. The population biology and ecology of the Homerus swallowtail, (Pterourus) homerus, in the Cockpit Country, Jamaica. J. Insect Conserv. 12: 179-188.
26. León-Cortés, J. L., M. Cowley, and C. D. Thomas. 1999. Detecting decline in a formerly widespread species: how common is the common blue butterßy Polyommatus icarus Ecography 22: 643-650.
27. León-Cortés, J. L., M. Cowley, and C. D. Thomas. 2000. The distribution and decline of a widespread butterßy Ly-caena phlaeas in a pastoral landscape. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 285-294.
28. León-Cortés, J. L., J. J. Lennon, and C. D. Thomas. 2003. Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks: I. The role of habitat pattern and quantity, stochasticity and dispersal. Oikos 102: 449-464.
29. León-Cortés, J. L., F. Pérez-Espinoza, L. Maŕn, and A. Molina-Mart́nez. 2004. Complex habitat requirements and conservation needs of the only extant Baroniinae swallowtail butterßy. Anim. Conserv. 7: 241-250.
30. Lewis, O. T., C. D. Thomas, J. K. Hill,M.Brookes, T. P. Crane, Y. Graneau, J. Mallet, and O. Rose. 1997. Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterßy Plebejus argus. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 283-293.
31. Lewis, O. T., R. J. Wilson, and M. C. Harper. 1998. Endemic butterßies on Grande Comore: habitat preferences and conservation priorities. Biol. Conserv. 85: 113-121.
32. Luis-Martinez, A., F. Vargas, and J. B. Llorente-Bousquets. 1991. Lepidopterofauna de Oaxaca I. Distribución y Fenologṍa de los Papilionoidea de la Sierra de Juárez. Publ. Esp. Mus. Zool. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mex. 3: 1-121.
33. Meave, J. A., A. Rincó n, and M. A. Romero. 2006. Oak forest of the hyper-humid region of La Chinantla, Northern Oaxaca range, Mexico, pp. 113-126. In M. Kapelle (ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical montane Fforests. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
34. Morrone, J. J., and J. Llorente-Bousquets. 2006. Componentes Bió ticos Principales de la Entomofauna Mexicana. Las Prensas de Ciencias, UNAM
35. D.F. Neve, G., B. Barascud, R. Hughes, J. Aubert, H. Descimon, P. Lebrun, and M. Baguette. 1996. Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterßy Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 14-22.
36. New, T. R., R. M. Pyle, J. A. Thomas, C. D. Thomas, and P. C. Hammond. 1995. Butterßy conservation management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 57-83.
37. Norusis, M. J. 2006. SPSS for windows, Version 15.0. SPSS Guide to Data Analysis. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
38. Pollard, E., and T. Yates. 1993. Monitoring butterßies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.
39. Porter-Bolland, L., E. A. Ellis, M. R. Guariguata, I. Ruiz-Mallén, S. Negrete-Yankelevich, and V. Reyes-Garća. 2012. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. For. Ecol. Manage. 268: 6-17.
40. Pounds, A. J., P. L. Fogden, and J. H. Campbell. 1999. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611-615.
41. Still, C. J., P. N. Foster, and S. H. Schneider. 1999. Simulating the effects of climate change on tropical montane cloud forests. Nature 398: 608-610.
42. Sreekumar, P. G., and M. Balakrishnan. 2001. Habitat and altitude preferences of butterßies in Aralam. Wildl. Trop. Ecol. 42: 277-281.
43. Sutcliffe, O. L., C. D. Thomas, and D. Moss. 1996. Spatial synchrony and asynchrony in butterßy population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 85-95.
44. Swengel, A. B., and S. R. Swengel. 2005. Long-term population monitoring of the Karner Blue (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Wisconsin, 1990-2004. Great Lakes Entomol. 38: 107-134.
45. Thomas, C. D., and S. Harrison. 1992. Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterßy species. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 437-446.
46. Thomas, C. D., and T. M. Jones. 1993. Partial recovery of a skipper butterßy (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 472-481.
47. Thomas, J. A. 1983. A quick method for estimating butterßy numbers during surveys. Biol. Conserv. 27: 195-211.
48. Thomas, J. A., N.A.D. Bourn, R. T. Clarke, K. E. Stewart, D. J. Simcox, G. S. Pearman, R. Curtis, and B. Goodger. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterßies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1791-1796.
49. Toledo-Aceves, T., J. A. Meave, M. González-Espinosa, and N. Raḿrez-Marcial. 2011. Tropical montane cloud forests: current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. J. Environ. Manage. 92: 974-981.
50. Torres-Coĺn, R. 2004. Tipos de vegetació n, pp. 105-117. In A. J. Garcṍa-Mendoza, M. J. Ordón ez, and M. Briones-Salas (eds.), Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Instituto de Biologṍa-UNAM-Fondo Oaxaquen o para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund, Mé xico, D.F.
51. Mé xico, D.F Trejo, I. 2004. Clima, pp. 67-85. In A. J. Garcṍa-Mendoza, M.J. Ordón ez, andM.Briones-Salas (eds.), Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Instituto de Biologṍa-UNAM-Fondo Oaxaquen o para la Conservación de la Naturaleza-World Wildlife Fund, Mexico City, D.F.
52. Tyler, H., K. S. Brown, and K. Wilson. 1994. Swallowtail butterßies of the Americas: a study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics and conservation. Scientic Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
53. Vaca, R. A., D. J. Golicher, and L. Cayuela. 2011. Using climatically based random forests to downscale coarsegrained potential natural vegetation maps in tropical Mexico. Appl. Veg. Sci. 14: 388-401.
54. Vovides, A. P. 1998. Magnolia dealbata. In IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2010.4. (http://www.iucnredlist.org).
55. White, G. C., and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-139.
56. Zakharov, E. V., M. S. Caterino, and F.A.H. Sperling. 2004. Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for Swallowtail Butterßies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Biol. 53: 193-215.