-
2
-
-
2442649987
-
When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
-
Vandenbroucke JP. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials? Lancet. 2004;363:1728-1731.
-
(2004)
Lancet.
, vol.363
, pp. 1728-1731
-
-
Vandenbroucke, J.P.1
-
3
-
-
0036040011
-
Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature: A systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years
-
Latronico N, Botteri M, Minelli C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature: a systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1316-1323.
-
(2002)
Intensive Care Med.
, vol.28
, pp. 1316-1323
-
-
Latronico, N.1
Botteri, M.2
Minelli, C.3
-
4
-
-
34548309352
-
A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials
-
Farrokhyar F, Chu R, Whitlock R, et al. A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials. Can J Surg. 2007;50:266-277.
-
(2007)
Can J Surg.
, vol.50
, pp. 266-277
-
-
Farrokhyar, F.1
Chu, R.2
Whitlock, R.3
-
5
-
-
33750327489
-
The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: A systematic review
-
Jacquier I, Boutron I, Moher D, et al. The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;244:677-683.
-
(2006)
Ann Surg.
, vol.244
, pp. 677-683
-
-
Jacquier, I.1
Boutron, I.2
Moher, D.3
-
6
-
-
0036512072
-
Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the fracture care literature
-
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Lochner H, et al. Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the fracture care literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:485-489.
-
(2002)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.84
, pp. 485-489
-
-
Bhandari, M.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
Lochner, H.3
-
7
-
-
0036512461
-
The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the journal of bone and joint surgery from 1988 through 2000
-
Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, et al. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:388-396.
-
(2002)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.84
, pp. 388-396
-
-
Bhandari, M.1
Richards, R.R.2
Sprague, S.3
-
8
-
-
35448970592
-
The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies
-
Chan S, Bhandari M. The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1970-1078.
-
(2007)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.89
, pp. 1970-1078
-
-
Chan, S.1
Bhandari, M.2
-
9
-
-
0032146967
-
Quality assessment of reports on clinical trials in the Journal of Hepatology
-
Gluud C, Nikolova D. Quality assessment of reports on clinical trials in the Journal of Hepatology. J Hepatol. 1998;29:321-327.
-
(1998)
J Hepatol.
, vol.29
, pp. 321-327
-
-
Gluud, C.1
Nikolova, D.2
-
10
-
-
84970852560
-
The scandal of poor medical research
-
Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ. 1994;308:283-284.
-
(1994)
BMJ
, vol.308
, pp. 283-284
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
11
-
-
9444255722
-
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
-
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637-639.
-
(1996)
JAMA
, vol.276
, pp. 637-639
-
-
Begg, C.1
Cho, M.2
Eastwood, S.3
-
12
-
-
0035857966
-
The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
-
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191-1194.
-
(2001)
Lancet.
, vol.357
, pp. 1191-1194
-
-
Moher, D.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
13
-
-
0029879646
-
Surgical research or comic opera: Questions, but fewanswers
-
Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but fewanswers. Lancet. 1996;347:984-985.
-
(1996)
Lancet.
, vol.347
, pp. 984-985
-
-
Horton, R.1
-
14
-
-
33750309253
-
What is the methodologic quality of human therapy studies in ISI surgical publications?
-
Manterola C, Pineda V, Vial M, et al. What is the methodologic quality of human therapy studies in ISI surgical publications? Ann Surg. 2006;244:827-832.
-
(2006)
Ann Surg.
, vol.244
, pp. 827-832
-
-
Manterola, C.1
Pineda, V.2
Vial, M.3
-
15
-
-
0030995370
-
CONSORT, randomized trials and the surgical scientific community
-
Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ. CONSORT, randomized trials and the surgical scientific community. Br J Surg. 1997;84:769-770.
-
(1997)
Br J Surg.
, vol.84
, pp. 769-770
-
-
Liem, M.S.1
Van Der Graaf, Y.2
Van Vroonhoven, T.J.3
-
16
-
-
70349288302
-
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
-
Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009;374:1089-1096.
-
(2009)
Lancet.
, vol.374
, pp. 1089-1096
-
-
Barkun, J.S.1
Aronson, J.K.2
Feldman, L.S.3
-
17
-
-
70349294326
-
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation
-
Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009;374:1097-1104.
-
(2009)
Lancet.
, vol.374
, pp. 1097-1104
-
-
Ergina, P.L.1
Cook, J.A.2
Blazeby, J.M.3
-
18
-
-
70349280608
-
No surgical innovationwithout evaluation: The IDEAL recommendations
-
McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovationwithout evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374:1105-1112.
-
(2009)
Lancet.
, vol.374
, pp. 1105-1112
-
-
McCulloch, P.1
Altman, D.G.2
Campbell, W.B.3
-
19
-
-
33846815302
-
Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement
-
Kane RL,Wang J, Garrard J. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:241-249.
-
(2007)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.60
, pp. 241-249
-
-
Kane Rlwang, J.1
Garrard, J.2
-
20
-
-
33748671821
-
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review
-
Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185:263-267.
-
(2006)
Med J Aust.
, vol.185
, pp. 263-267
-
-
Plint, A.C.1
Moher, D.2
Morrison, A.3
-
21
-
-
20444394060
-
An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently
-
Mills E, Wu P, Gagnier J, et al. An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:662-667.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.58
, pp. 662-667
-
-
Mills, E.1
Wu, P.2
Gagnier, J.3
-
22
-
-
41449094191
-
-
Available at Accessed May 13, 2008
-
The CONSORT Statement Web site. Available at http://www.consortstatement. org/. Accessed May 13, 2008.
-
The CONSORT Statement Web Site
-
-
-
24
-
-
77950278169
-
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: Comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
-
Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu L-M, et al. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ. 2010;340:c723.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
Hopewell, S.1
Dutton, S.2
Yu, L.-M.3
-
25
-
-
34547784405
-
Quality of prospective controlled randomized trials: Analysis of trials of treatment for lateral epicondylitis as an example
-
Cowan J, Lozano-Calderon S, Ring D. Quality of prospective controlled randomized trials: analysis of trials of treatment for lateral epicondylitis as an example. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1693-1699.
-
(2007)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.89
, pp. 1693-1699
-
-
Cowan, J.1
Lozano-Calderon, S.2
Ring, D.3
-
26
-
-
33746332682
-
Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting
-
Karri V. Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: survey of output and quality of reporting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:787-796.
-
(2006)
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
, vol.59
, pp. 787-796
-
-
Karri, V.1
-
27
-
-
36749055208
-
The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review
-
Agha R, Cooper D, Muir G. The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2007;5:413-422.
-
(2007)
Int J Surg.
, vol.5
, pp. 413-422
-
-
Agha, R.1
Cooper, D.2
Muir, G.3
-
28
-
-
33644823930
-
Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials
-
Ellis C, Hall JL, Khalil A, et al. Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:874-877.
-
(2005)
ANZ J Surg.
, vol.75
, pp. 874-877
-
-
Ellis, C.1
Hall, J.L.2
Khalil, A.3
-
29
-
-
84888136922
-
-
ClinicalTrials.gov Available at: Accessed January 2008
-
ClinicalTrials.gov. Glossary of clinical trials terms. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/glossary. Accessed January 2008.
-
Glossary of Clinical Trials Terms
-
-
-
30
-
-
54249152572
-
Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide: The contribution of EMBASE records to the cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL) in the cochrane library
-
Lefebvre C, Eisinga A, McDonald S, et al. Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide: the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008;5:13.
-
(2008)
Emerg Themes Epidemiol.
, vol.5
, pp. 13
-
-
Lefebvre, C.1
Eisinga, A.2
McDonald, S.3
-
31
-
-
0036203445
-
Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed
-
Robinson KA, Dickersin K. Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:150-153.
-
(2002)
Int J Epidemiol.
, vol.31
, pp. 150-153
-
-
Robinson, K.A.1
Dickersin, K.2
-
32
-
-
0017360990
-
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
-
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
-
(1977)
Biometrics.
, vol.33
, pp. 159-174
-
-
Landis, J.R.1
Koch, G.G.2
-
33
-
-
0035857966
-
The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
-
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191-1194.
-
(2001)
Lancet.
, vol.357
, pp. 1191-1194
-
-
Moher, D.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
34
-
-
0037024299
-
Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality
-
Huwiler-Muntener K, Juni P, Junker C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA. 2002;287:2801-2804.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2801-2804
-
-
Huwiler-Muntener, K.1
Juni, P.2
Junker, C.3
-
35
-
-
62549086593
-
Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: The example of hip and knee osteoarthritis
-
Ahmad N, Boutron I, Moher D, et al. Neglected external validity in reports of randomized trials: the example of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:361-369.
-
(2009)
Arthritis Rheum.
, vol.61
, pp. 361-369
-
-
Ahmad, N.1
Boutron, I.2
Moher, D.3
-
36
-
-
33947498821
-
Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: A systematic sampling review
-
Van Spall HGC, Toren A, Kiss A, et al. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297:1233-1240.
-
(2007)
JAMA
, vol.297
, pp. 1233-1240
-
-
Van Spall, H.G.C.1
Toren, A.2
Kiss, A.3
-
37
-
-
0037067155
-
Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
-
Balk EM, Bonis PAL, Moskowitz H, et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2002;287:2973-2982.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2973-2982
-
-
Balk, E.M.1
Pal, B.2
Moskowitz, H.3
-
39
-
-
0034098108
-
How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature?
-
Adetugbo K, Williams H. How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature? Arch Dermatol. 2000;136: 381-385.
-
(2000)
Arch Dermatol.
, vol.136
, pp. 381-385
-
-
Adetugbo, K.1
Williams, H.2
-
40
-
-
5344243710
-
Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials
-
Halpern SH, Darani R, Douglas MJ, et al. Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004;13:207-214.
-
(2004)
Int J Obstet Anesth.
, vol.13
, pp. 207-214
-
-
Halpern, S.H.1
Darani, R.2
Douglas, M.J.3
-
41
-
-
0035906286
-
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation
-
MoherD, JonesA, Lepage L, et al. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA. 2001;285:1992-1995.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 1992-1995
-
-
Jonesa, M.1
Lepage, L.2
-
42
-
-
52049100936
-
Comparison of skin blood flow between mini-and standard-incision approaches during total hip arthroplasty
-
Kiyama T, Naito M, Shitama H, et al. Comparison of skin blood flow between mini-and standard-incision approaches during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthropl. 2008;23:1045-1049.
-
(2008)
J Arthropl.
, vol.23
, pp. 1045-1049
-
-
Kiyama, T.1
Naito, M.2
Shitama, H.3
-
43
-
-
56549126129
-
Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial cutting guide in severely obese patients undergoing total knee replacement: A randomized study of 70 patients with body mass index 35 kg/m2
-
Lozano LM, Segur JM, Macule F, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial cutting guide in severely obese patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomized study of 70 patients with body mass index 35 kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1599-1604.
-
(2008)
Obes Surg.
, vol.18
, pp. 1599-1604
-
-
Lozano, L.M.1
Segur, J.M.2
MacUle, F.3
-
44
-
-
40949113623
-
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: Meta-epidemiological study
-
Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336:601-605.
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, pp. 601-605
-
-
Wood, L.1
Egger, M.2
Gluud, L.L.3
-
45
-
-
17544390353
-
The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions
-
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, et al. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123: A12-A13.
-
(1995)
ACP J Club.
, vol.123
-
-
Richardson, W.S.1
Wilson, M.C.2
Nishikawa, J.3
-
46
-
-
0028276374
-
Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials
-
Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994;272:122-124.
-
(1994)
JAMA
, vol.272
, pp. 122-124
-
-
Moher, D.1
Dulberg, C.S.2
Wells, G.A.3
-
47
-
-
0028304329
-
The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results
-
Goodman SN, Berlin JA. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:200-206.
-
(1994)
Ann Intern Med.
, vol.121
, pp. 200-206
-
-
Goodman, S.N.1
Berlin, J.A.2
-
48
-
-
79953020393
-
Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery
-
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):CD007635.
-
(2011)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
, Issue.2
-
-
Spanjersberg, W.R.1
Reurings, J.2
Keus, F.3
-
49
-
-
0346688601
-
Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: Observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
-
Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A, et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ. 2004;328: 22-24.
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.328
, pp. 22-24
-
-
Soares, H.P.1
Daniels, S.2
Kumar, A.3
-
50
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias.Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
SchulzKF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias.Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408-412.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Hayes, R.J.3
-
51
-
-
40049106691
-
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
-
Boutron IMDP, Moher DP, Altman DGD, et al. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295-309.
-
(2008)
Ann Intern Med.
, vol.148
, pp. 295-309
-
-
Boutron, I.M.D.P.1
Moher, D.P.2
Altman, D.G.D.3
-
52
-
-
77950189829
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 340:c332.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
|