Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 823-832

  Horn, Susan D ^a   Fife, Caroline E ^b   Smout, Randall J ^a   Barrett, Ryan S ^a   Thomson, Brett ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL OUTCOMES RESEARCH   (United States)

^b INTELLICURE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC WOUND; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECUBITUS; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALNUTRITION; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; SKIN ULCER; STRATIFIED SAMPLE; SURGICAL WOUND; UNITED STATES; WAGNER GRADE; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND CARE; WOUND HEALING; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; INJURY; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGISTER; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84888134915     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Schwartz D, Lellouch J,. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 499-505.
2. Carter MJ, Fife CE, Thomson B, Walker D,. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care 2009; 22: 316-324.
3. Kent D, Hayward R,. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. JAMA 2007; 298: 1209-1212.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee Meeting [transcript]. March 29, 2005. Available at http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/FACA/downloads/id28a.pdf (accessed March 29, 2013).
5. Institute of Medicine. Key capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System (Electric Health Record Functional Model: Letter Report). Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine National Academies Press, 2003.
6. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. June 30, 2009. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf (accessed March 22, 2010).
7. Fife CE, Buyukcakir C, Otto G, Sheffield P, Love T, Warriner III R,. Factors influencing the outcome of lower-extremity diabetic ulcers treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15: 322-331.
8. Cukjati D, Robnik-Sikonja M, Rebersek S, Kononenko I, Miklavicic D,. Prognostic factors in the prediction of chronic wound healing by electrical stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 2001; 39: 542-550.
9. Birke JA, Novick A, Patout C, Colenan WC,. Healing rates of plantar ulcers in leprosy and diabetes. Lepr Rev 1992; 63: 365-374.
10. Johnson M,. Using cluster analysis to develop a healing typology in vascular ulcers. Vasc Nurs 1997; 15: 45-50.
11. Lavery LA, Barnes SA, Keith MS, Seaman JW, Armstrong DG,. Prediction of healing for post operative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 26-29.
12. Sheehan P, Jones P, Caselli A, Givrin JM, Veves A,. Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1879-1882.
13. Christman AL, Selvin E, Margolis D, Lazarus GS, Garza LA,. Hemoglobin A1c predicts healing rate in diabetic wounds. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 2121-2127.
14. Prince S, Dodds SR,. Use of ulcer size and initial responses to treatment to predict the healing time of leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2006; 15: 299-303.
15. Claesson K, Kolbel T, Acosta S,. Role of endovascular intervention in patients with diabetic foot ulcer and concomitant peripheral arterial disease. Int Angiol 2011; 30: 349-358.
16. Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Edmonds M, Jude E, Mauricio D, et al. Prediction of outcomes in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 747-755.
17. Barberan J, Granizo JJ, Aguilar L, Alguacil R, Sainz F, Menendez MA, et al. Predictive model of short-term amputation during hospitalization of patients due to acute diabetic foot infections. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2010; 28: 680-684.
18. Lyman IR, Tenery JH, Basson RP,. Correlation between decrease in bacterial load and rate of wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 130: 616-622.
19. Lipsky BA, Weigelt JA, Xiaowu S, Johannes RS, Derby KG, Tabak YP,. Developing and validating a risk score for lower-extremity amputation in patients hospitalized for a diabetic foot infection. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1695-1700.
20. Morback S, Fuchert H, Groblinghoff U, Hoffmeier H, Kersten K, Klauke GT, et al. Long-term prognosis of diabetic foot patients and their limbs. Amputation and death over the course of a decade. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 2021-2027.
21. Sherratt JA, Dallon JC,. Theoretical models of wound healing: past success and future challenges. C R Biol 2002; 325: 557-564.
22. Zimny S, Schatz H, Pfohl M,. The effects of ulcer size on the wound radius reductions and healing times in neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2004; 112: 191-194.
23. Zimny S, Schatz H, Pfohl M,. Determinants and estimation of healing times in diabetic foot ulcers. J Diabetes Complications 2002; 16: 327-332.
24. Mayrovitz HN, Smith J, Ingram C,. Geometric, shape, and area measurement considerations for diabetic neuropathic plantar ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 1997; 43: 58-65.
25. Cukjati D, Rebersek S, Miklavcic D,. A reliable method of determining wound healing rate. Med Biol Eng Comput 2001; 39: 263-271.
26. Cukjati D, Rebersek S, Karba R, Micklavcic D,. Mathematical modeling of chronic wound healing. Electo-Magnet Biol 1998; 17: 235-240.
27. Cukjati D, Karba R, Rebersek S, Miklavcic D,. Modeling of chronic wound healing dynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000; 38: 339-347.
28. Olsen LM, Maini PK, Dallon JC, Sherratt JA,. Mathematical modeling of anisotropy in fibrous connective tissue. Math Biosci 1998; 158: 145-170.
29. Geris L, Gerish A, Schugar RC,. Mathematical modeling in wound healing, bone regeneration, and tissue engineering. Acta Biotheor 2010; 58: 355-367.
30. Stark P,. Congressional intent for the HITECH Act. Am J Manag Care 2010; 16 (12 Suppl. HIT): SP24-28.
31. Fife CE, Wall V, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B,. Examining the relationship between physician and facility level-of-service coding in outpatient wound centers: results of a multicenter study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2012; 58: 20-22, 24, 26-8.
32. Horn SD, Torres A Jr, Willson D, Dean JM, Gassaway J, Smout R,. Development of a pediatric age- and disease-specific severity measure. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 496-503.