A comparison of bovine bone and hydroxyapatite scaffolds during initial bone regeneration: An in vitro evaluation

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 613-622

  Mastrangelo, Filiberto ^a   Quaresima, Raimondo ^b   Grilli, Alfredo ^a,c   Tettamanti, Lucia ^d   Vinci, Raffaele ^e   Sammartino, Gilberto ^f   Tetè, Stefano ^a   Gherlone, Enrico ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^c Online University L DaVinci   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^e VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bio Oss; bone; ENGIpore; mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenesis; regeneration

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANIMAL; BONE REGENERATION; BOVINE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; NORTHERN BLOTTING; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STEM CELL; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TOOTH PAPILLA; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BLOTTING, NORTHERN; BLOTTING, WESTERN; BONE REGENERATION; CATTLE; CHILD; DENTAL PAPILLA; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MALE; OSTEOBLASTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STEM CELLS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84888131695     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182a69858     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Liao X, Lu S, Zhuo Y, et al. Visualization of Src and FAK activity during the differentiation process from HMSCs to osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42709.
2. Miron RJ, Zhang YF. Osteoinduction: A review of old concepts with new standards. J Dent Res. 2012;91:736-744.
3. Tetè S, Mastrangelo F, Quaresima R, et al. Influence of novel nano-titanium implant surface on human osteoblast behavior and growth. Implant Dent. 2010;19:520-531.
4. Rogers GF, Greene AK. Autogenous bone graft: Basic science and clinical implications. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:323-327.
5. Wang C, Meng G, Zhang L, et al. Physical properties and biocompatibility of a core-sheath structure composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering in vitro. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:579141.
6. Mastrangelo F, Nargi E, Carone L, et al. Tridimensional response of human dental follicular stem cells onto a synthetic hydroxyapatite scaffold. J Health Sci. 2008;54:154-161.
7. Gierloff M, Seeck NG, Springer I, et al. Orbital floor reconstruction with resorbable polydioxanone implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:161-164.
8. Tetè S, Vinci R, Zara S, et al. Atrophic jaw reconstruction by means of calvarial bone graft: Long-term results. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1147-1152.
9. Springer IN, Açil Y, Spies C, et al. RhBMP-7 improves survival and eruption in a growing tooth avulsion trauma model. Bone. 2005;37:570-577.
10. Trubiani O, Fulle S, Traini T, et al. Functional assay, expression of growth factors and proteins modulating bonearrangement in human osteoblasts seeded on an anorganic bovine bone biomaterial. Eur Cell Mater. 2010;20:72-83.
11. Jafarian M, Eslaminejad MB, Khojasteh A, et al. Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-directed bone regeneration in the dog mandible: A comparison between biphasic calcium phosphate and natural bone mineral. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105: e14-e24.
12. Despang F, Bernhardt A, Lode A, et al. Synthesis and physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of an anisotropic, nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bisque scaffold with parallel-aligned pores mimicking the microstructure of cortical bone. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013. doi: 10.1002/term. 1729. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23585334.
13. Nadeem D, Kiamehr M, Yang X, et al. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of a sponge-like bioactive-glass/gelatin composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33: 2669-2678. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013. 02.021.
14. Neman J, Hambrecht A, Cadry C, et al. Clinical efficacy of stem cell mediated osteogenesis and bioceramics for bone tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;760:174-187.
15. Boeckel DG, Shinkai RS, Grossi ML, et al. Cell culture-based tissue engineering as an alternative to bone grafts in implant dentistry: A literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38:538-545. doi: 10. 1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00197.
16. Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materialsdFrom space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:706-718.
17. Li X, Huang Y, Zheng L, et al. Effect of substrate stiffness on the functions of rat bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013. doi: 10. 1002/jbm.a.34774. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23630099.
18. Sun X, Kang Y, Bao J, et al. Modeling vascularized bone regeneration within a porous biodegradable CaP scaffold loaded with growth factors. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4971-4981. doi: 10.1016/j. biomaterials.2013.03.015.
19. Manfrini M, Di Bona C, Canella A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from patients to assay bone graft substitutes. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228:1229-1237. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24276.
20. Aravamudhan A, Ramos DM, Nip J, et al. Osteoinductive small molecules: Growth factor alternatives for bone tissue engineering. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19: 3420-3428.
21. Liu H, Gronthos S, Shi S. Dental pulp stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006; 419:99-113.
22. Huang GT, Gronthos S, Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: Their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res. 2009;88:792-806.
23. Wood RM, Moore DL. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraoral harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:209-214.
24. González-García R, Naval-Gías L, Muñoz-Guerra MF, et al. Preprosthetic and implantological surgery in patients with severe maxillary atrophy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10:343-354.
25. Orsini G, Bianchi AE, Vinci R, et al. Histologic evaluation of autogenous calvarial bone in maxillary onlay bone grafts: A report of 2 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:594-598.
26. Iizuka T, Smolka W, Hallermann W, et al. Extensive augmentation of the alveolar ridge using autogenous calvarial split bone grafts for dental rehabilitation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:607-615.
27. Lundgren S, Moy P, Johansson C, et al. Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with particulated mandible: A histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:760-766.
28. Hising P, Bolin A, Branting C. Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:90-97.
29. Mangano C, Scarano A, Iezzi G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using an engineered porous hydroxyapatite: A clinical, histological, and transmission electron microscopy study in man. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:122-131.
30. Somanathan RV, Simunek A. Evaluation of the success of beta-tricalciumphosphate and deproteinized bovine bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using histomorphometry: A review. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2006;49:87-89.
31. Boëck-Neto RJ, Gabrielli M, Lia R, et al. Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite. J Periodontol. 2002;73: 26-70.
32. Aguirre Zorzano LA, Rodriguez Tojo MJ, Aguirre Urizar JM. Maxillary sinus lift with intraoral autologous bone and B-tricalcium phosphate: Histological and histomorphometric clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12: E532-E536.
33. Riccio M, Resca E, Maraldi T, et al. Human dental pulp stem cells produce mineralized matrix in 2D and 3D cultures. Eur J Histochem. 2010;54:e46.
34. Zhang W, Walboomers XF, van Kuppevelt TH, et al. The performance of human dental pulp stem cells on different three-dimensional scaffold materials. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5658-5668.
35. Tetè S, Zara S, Vinci R, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and e-nitric oxide synthase-mediated regenerative response occurring upon autologous and heterologous bone grafts. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22:1105-1116.
36. Pappalardo S, Mastrangelo F, Reale Marroccia D, et al. Bone regeneration: In vitro evaluation of the behavior of osteoblast-like MG63 cells placed in contact with polylactic-co-glycolic acid, deproteinized bovine bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2008;22:175-183.
37. Tetè S, Nargi E, Mastrangelo F, et al. Changes in matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein expression before and during in vitro osteogenic differentiation of human dental papilla mesenchymal cells. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21:309-318.
38. Turhani D, Weissenböck M, Watzinger E, et al. Invitro study of adherent mandibular osteoblast-like cells on carrier materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34:543-550.
39. González M, Salvagni E, Rodríguez-Cabello JC, et al. A low elastic modulus Ti-Nb-Hf alloy bioactivated with an elastin-like protein-based polymer enhances osteoblast cell adhesion and spreading. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:819-826. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34388.
40. Otsuka F, Kataoka Y, Miyazaki T. Enhanced osteoblast response to electrical discharge machining surface. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:309-315.