Defining population problems: Using topic models for cross-national comparison of disciplinary development

Poetics

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 701-724

  Marshall, Emily A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic disciplines; Demography; Fertility; France; Great Britain; Topic models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888129895     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Blei D.M. Program for Correlated Topic Modeling, ctm-c 2007, http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~blei/ctm-c/index.html (accessed 16.05.11).
2. Blei D.M. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM 2012, 55(4):77-84.
3. Blei D.M., Lafferty J.D. A correlated topic model of Science. Annals of Applied Statistics 2007, 1(1):17-35.
4. Blei D.M., Lafferty J.D. Topic models. Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications 2009, 71-94. Taylor & Francis, London. A. Srivastava, M. Sahami (Eds.).
5. Blevins C. Topic Modeling Martha Ballard's Diary 2010, http://historying.org/2010/04/01/topic-modeling-martha-ballards-diary/ (accessed 02.04.12).
6. Caldwell J.C. Demography and social science. Population Studies 1996, 50(3):305-333.
7. Davis K. The world demographic transition. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1945, 237:1-11.
8. Demeny P. Early fertility decline in Austria-Hungary: a lesson in demographic transition. Daedalus 1968, 97:502-522.
9. Desrosières A. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning 1998, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. DiMaggio P., Nag M., Blei D.M. Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics 2013, 41:570-606.
11. Duell J. Assessing the literary: intellectual boundaries and justification in French and American literary studies. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States 2000, 94-126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M. Lamont, L. Thevenot (Eds.).
12. Evans P. Mr. Powell's charge on coloured birthrate. The Times 1971, February:1.
13. Evans P. Coloured population four million by 1985, Mr. Powell says. The Times 1971, February:2.
14. Fourcade M. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890-1990s 2009, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Glass D.V. Fertility trends in Europe since the Second World War. Population Studies 1968, 22:103-146.
16. Grebenik E. Demographic research in Britain 1936-1986. Population Studies 1991, 45:3-30.
17. Grebenik E. On population studies: its origins and outlook. Population and Development Review 1997, 23(3):575-577.
18. Hodgson D. Demography as social science and policy science. Population and Development Review 1983, 9(1):1-34.
19. Hodgson D. Orthodoxy and revisionism in American demography. Population and Development Review 1988, 14(4):441-469.
20. JSTOR Data for Research, 2012. (accessed 09.05.12). http://dfr.jstor.org/.
21. Kirk D. Demographic transition theory. Population Studies 1996, 50:361-387.
22. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M. Lamont, L. Thevenot (Eds.).
23. Landry A. La révolution démographique 1934 [1927], Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris.
24. Landry A. Adolphe Landry on the demographic revolution. Population and Development Review 1987 [1933], 13(4):731-740.
25. Marshall E.A. Population Problems? Demographic Knowledge and Fertility in Great Britain and France, 1945-2005 2012, Princeton University, (Doctoral Thesis).
26. Newman D., Block S. Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(6):753-767.
27. Notestein F. Population: the long view. Food for the World 1945, 36-57. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. T. Schultz (Ed.).
28. Porter T. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
29. Rosental P.-A. L'intelligence démographique: Sciences et politiques des populations en France, 1930-1960 2003, Jacob, Paris.
30. Sauvy A. Adolphe Landry. Population 1956, 11(4):609-620.
31. Schweber L. Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830-1885 2006, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
32. Soloway R. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain 1990, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
33. Spengler J. France Faces Depopulation: Postlude Edition, 1936-1976 1979, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
34. Szreter S. The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history. Population and Development Review 1993, 19(4):659-701.
35. Teitelbaum M., Winter J. The Fear of Population Decline 1985, Academic Press, New York.
36. Thomson Reuters Journals Ranked by Impact: Demography 2012, http://sciencewatch.com/dr/sci/09/nov8-09_1/ (accessed 16.05.12).
37. Thornton A. Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. van Bavel J. Subreplacement fertility in the West before the baby boom: past and current perspectives. Population Studies 2010, 64(1):1-18.
39. van de Kaa D. Demographic revolutions or transitions? A foreword. Childbearing Trends and Prospects in Low-Fertility Countries: A Cohort Analysis 2004, pxi-xiv. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. T. Frejka, J.-P. Sardon (Eds.).