An ISM approach for modelling the enablers in the implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)

International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 313-326

  Attri, Rajesh ^a   Grover, Sandeep ^a   Dev, Nikhil ^a   Kumar, Deepak ^b  

^a YMCA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b Advanced Institute of Technology and Management   (India)

Author keywords

Enablers; Interpretive structural modelling; Total productive maintenance; TPM

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SURVEYS;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; ENABLERS; EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY; INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELLING (ISM); MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS; MUTUAL INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL MODELLING; TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 84888110911     PISSN: 09756809     EISSN: 09764348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-012-0088-7     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling agility of supply chain. Ind Mark Manag 36:443-457
2. Agyris C (1998) Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. Harvard Bus Rev 76(3):98-105
3. Ahuja IPS, Khamba JS (2008a) Strategies and success factors for overcoming challenges in TPM implementation in Indian manufacturing industry. J Qual Maint Eng 14(2):123-147
4. Ahuja IPS, Khamba JS (2008b) Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25(7):709-756
5. Badiru AB, Schlegel RE (1994) Project management in computer-integrated manufacturing implementation. In: Karwowski W, Salvendy G (eds) Organization and management of advanced manufacturing. Wiley, New York, pp 255-279
6. Bamber CJ, Sharp JM, Hides M (1999) Factors affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance: a UK manufacturing case study perspective. J Qual Maint Eng 5(3):162-181
7. Banwet DK, Arora R (1999) Enablers and inhibitors of e-commerce implementation in India-an interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach. In: Kanda A et al (eds) Operations management for global economy challenges and prospects. Phoenix, New Delhi, pp 332-341
8. Blanchard BS (1997) An enhanced approach for implementing total productive maintenance in the manufacturing environment. J Qual Maint Eng 3(2):69-80
9. Bolaños R, Fontela E, Nenclares A, Paster P (2005) Using interpretive structural modeling in strategic decision making groups. Manag Decis 43(6):877-895
10. Chan FTS, Lau HCW, Ip RWL, Chan HK, Kong S (2005) Implementation of total productive maintenance: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 95:71-94
11. Chen F (1997) Issue in the continuous improvement process for preventive maintenance: observations from Honda, Nippondenso and Toyota. Prod Inventory Manag J 38(4):13-16
12. Chidambaranathan S, Muralidharan C, Deshmukh SG (2009) Analyzing the interaction of critical factors of supplier development using Interpretive Structural Modeling: an empirical study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:1081-1093
13. Coetzee JL (1999) A holistic approach to the maintenance problem. J Qual Maint Eng 5(3):276-280
14. Dal B, Tugwell P, Greatbanks R (2000) Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure for operational improvement. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(12):1488-1502
15. Davis R, Willmott P (1999) Total productive maintenance. Alden Press, Oxford
16. Eti MC, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD (2004) Implementing total productive maintenance in Nigerian manufacturing firms. App Energy 79:385-401
17. Faisal MN, Banwat DK, Shankar R (2006) Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Buss Process Manag J 12(4):532-552
18. Faisal MN, Banwat DK, Shankar R (2007a) Supply chain agility: analysing the enablers. Int J Agile Syst Manag 2(1):76-91
19. Faisal MN, Banwat DK, Shankar R (2007b) Information risks management in supply chain: an assessment and mitigation framework. J Enterp Inf Manag 20(6):677-699
20. Farris DR, Sage AP (1974) On the use of interpretive structural modeling for worth assessment. Comp Electr Eng 2:149-174
21. Georgakopoulos A (2009) Teacher effectiveness examined as a system: interpretive modelling and facilitation sessions with U.S. and Japanese students. Int Edu Stud 2(3):60-76
22. Jeszenka RJ (1993) Breaking through the resistance: achieving TQM in maintenance. Plant Eng 47:132-133
23. Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2004) IT-enablement of supply chains: modelling the enablers. Int J Productivity Perform Manag 53(8):700-712
24. Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2005) IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers. J Enterp Inform Manag 18(1):11-27
25. Jonsson P, Lesshammar M (1999) Evaluation and improvement of manufacturing performance measurement systems: the role of OEE. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(1):55-78
26. Lawrence JJ (1999) Use mathematical modelling to give your TPM implementation effort an extra boost. J Qual Maint Eng 5(1):62-69
27. Li WL, Humphreys P, Chan LY, Kumaraswamy M (2003) Predicting purchasing performance: the role of supplier development programs. J Mater Process Technol 138(1-3):243-249
28. Maggard BN, Rhyne DM (1992) Total productive maintenance: a timely integration of production and maintenance. Prod Inventory Manag J 33(4):6-10
29. Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16(4):407-425
30. Mandal A, Deshmukh SG (1994) Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int J Oper Prod Manag 14(6):52-59
31. Moore R (1997) Combining TPM and reliability-focused maintenance. Plant Eng 51(6):88-90
32. Mora E (2002) The right ingredients for a successful TPM or lean implementation. Available at: www.tpmonline.com
33. Nakajima S (1988) Total productive maintenance. Productivity Press, London
34. Nakajima S (1989) TPM development program: implementing total productive maintenance. Productivity Press, Cambridge
35. Paneerselvam R (2010) Production and operations management, PHI learning Private limited
36. Park KS, Han SW (2001) TPM-total productive maintenance: impact on competitiveness and a framework for successful implementation. Hum Factor Ergonomics Manuf 11(4):321-338
37. Parmod VR, Banwet DK (2010) ISM for the inhibitors of service supply chain: a case study in a safety health environment and risk consultancy health centre. Int J Logis Eco Glob 2(2):151-175
38. Patterson JW, Kennedy WJ, Fredendall LD (1995) Total productive maintenance is not for this company. Prod Inventory Manag J 36(2):61-64
39. Patterson JW, Fredendall LD, Kennedy WJ, McGee A (1996) Adapting total productive maintenance to Asten, Inc. Prod Inventory Manag J 37(4):32-36
40. Qureshi MN, Kumar D, Kumar P (2007) Modeling the logistics outsourcing relationships variables to enhance shippers productivity and competitiveness in logistics supply chain. Int J Prod Perform Manag 56(8):689-714
41. Raj T, Attri R (2011) Identification and modelling of barriers in the implementation of TQM. Int J Prod Qual Manag 28(2):153-179
42. Raj T, Shankar R, Suhaib M (2007) An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India. Int J Prod Res 1-30
43. Rajesh KS, Suresh KG, Deshmukh SG (2007) Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs. Int J Prod Qual Manag 2(4):423-440
44. Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72:1011-1029
45. Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain. Int J Prod Perform Meas 54(4):239-255
46. Sage AP (1977) Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for large scale systems. McGraw-Hill, New York
47. Saxena JP, Sushil VP, Vrat P (1990) The impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables: a MICMAC analysis for energy conservation. Syst Res 7(4):245-253
48. Saxena JP, Sushil, Vrat P (1992) Scenario building: a critical study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 41(2):121-146
49. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (1996) A beginner's guide to structural equation modelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pittsburgh
50. Sharma HD, Gupta AD, Sushil (1995) The objectives of waste management in India: a future inquiry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 48:285-309
51. Sharma RK, Kumar D, Kumar P (2005) FLM to select suitable maintenance strategy in process industries using MISO model. J Qual Maint Eng 11(4):359-374
52. Singh MD, Kant R (2008) Knowledge management barriers: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 3(2):141-150
53. Singh MD, Shankar R, Narain R, Agarwal A (2003) An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries. J Adv Manag Res 1(1):28-40
54. Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG, Kumar M (2007) Modeling of critical success factors for implementation of AMTs. J Model Manag 2(3):232-250
55. Swanson L (1997) An empirical study of the relationship between production technology and maintenance management. Int J Prod Econ 53(2):191-207
56. Thakkar J, Deshmukh SG, Gupta AD, Shankar R (2007) Development of score card: an integrated approach of ISM and ANP. Int J Prod Perform Manag 56(1):25-59
57. Thakkar J, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG (2008) Evaluation of buyer-supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic approach. J Manuf Technol Manag 19(1):92-124
58. Thiagarajan T, Zairi M (1997) A review of total quality management in practice: understanding the fundamentals through examples of best practice applications: Part 1. TQM Mag 9(4):270-286
59. Tsang AHC, Chan PK (2000) TPM implementation in China: a case study. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 17(2):144-157
60. Tsang AHC, Jardine AKS, Cambell JD, Picknell JV (2000) Reliability-centred maintenance: a key to maintenance excellence. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong (internet publication)
61. Tsuchiya S (1992) Quality maintenance: zero defects through equipment management. Productivity Press, Oregon
62. Turbide DA (1995) Japan's new advantage: total productive maintenance. Qual Prog 28(3):121-123
63. Venkatesh V (2007) An introduction to Total productive maintenance (TPM). Available at: www.plant-maintenance.com
64. Warfield JW (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transac Syst Men Cyber 4(1):51-81
65. Wisner JD (2003) A structural equation model of supply chain management strategies and firm performance. J Bus Logist 24(1):1-26
66. Yu J, Cooper H (1983) A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. J Mark Res 36:36-44