Friction based social force model for social foraging of sheep flock

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 273, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-62

  Li, Zhaofeng ^a   Jiang, Yichuan ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Collective behavior; Decision process; Friction; Multi agent simulation; Social foraging; Social force model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDING; TRIBOLOGY;

COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION PROCESS; MULTI AGENT SIMULATION; SOCIAL FORAGING; SOCIAL FORCE MODELS;

FRICTION;

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HERBIVORE; MOVEMENT; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; SHEEP;

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84888107548     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.10.029     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adler P., Raff D., Lauenroth W. The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 2001, 128(4):465-479.
2. Albano E.V. Self-organized collective displacements of self-driven individuals. Physical Review Letters 1996, 77(10):2129-2132.
3. Aldana M., Dossetti V., Huepe C., Kenkre V.M., Larralde H. Phase transitions in systems of self-propelled agents and related network models. Physical Review Letters 2007, 98(9):095702.
4. Allden W.G., McDWhittaker I.A. The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Crop and Pasture Science 1970, 21(5):755-766.
5. Baumont R., Cohen-Salmon D., Prache S., Sauvant D. A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2004, 112(1):5-28.
6. Benhamou S. How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension?. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2004, 229(2):209-220.
7. Cao L. In-depth behavior understanding and use: the behavior informatics approach. Information Sciences 2010, 180(17):3067-3085.
8. Conradt L., List C. Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey. Philosophical transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364(1518):719-742.
9. Conradt L., Roper T.J. Consensus decision making in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 20(8):449-456.
10. Couzin I.D., Krause J. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Advances in the Study of Behavior 2003, 32:1-75.
11. Couzin I.D., Laidre M.E. Fission-fusion populations. Current Biology 2009, 19(15):R633.
12. Couzin I.D., Krause J., James R., Ruxton G.D., Franks N.R. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2002, 218(1):1-11.
13. D'Orsogna M.R., Chuang Y.L., Bertozzi A.L., Chayes L.S. Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions: patterns, stability, and collapse. Physical Review Letters 2006, 96(10):104302.
14. de Knegt H.J., Hengeveld G.M., van Langevelde F., de Boer W.F., Kirkman K.P. Patch density determines movement patterns and foraging efficiency of large herbivores. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18(6):1065-1072.
15. de Weerd H., Verbrugge R., Verheij B. How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study. Artificial Intelligence 2013, 199-200:67-92.
16. Dumont B., Boissy A. Grazing behaviour of sheep in a situation of conflict between feeding and social motivations. Behavioural Processes 2000, 49(3):131-138.
17. Dumont B., Hill D.R. Spatially explicit models of group foraging by herbivores: what can Agent-Based Models offer?. Animal Research 2004, 53(5):419-428.
18. Dyer J.R.G., Croft D.P., Morrell L.J., Krause J. Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology 2009, 20(1):165-171.
19. Dyer J.R.G., Johansson A., Helbing D., Couzin I.D., Krause J. Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364(1518):781-789.
20. Ginelli F., Chaté H. Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena. Physical Review Letters 2010, 105(16):168103.
21. Hainsworth F.R. Food quality and foraging efficiency. Journal of Comparative Physiology 1974, 88(4):425-431.
22. Helbing D., Molnar P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 1995, 51(5):4282.
23. Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 2000, 407(6803):487-490.
24. Kendal R.L., Coolen I., Laland K.N. The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 15(2):269-277.
25. Levine H., Rappel W.J., Cohen I. Self-organization in systems of self-propelled particles. Physical Review E 2000, 63(1):017101.
26. Li Z., Jiang Y. A friction based social force model for group behaviors. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Volume 02 2012, 1-8.
27. Michelena P., Sibbald A.M., Erhard H.W., McLeod J.E. Effects of group size and personality on social foraging: the distribution of sheep across patches. Behavioral Ecology 2009, 20(1):145-152.
28. Moussaïd M., Helbing D., Theraulaz G. How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108(17):6884-6888.
29. Niizato T., Gunji Y.P. Metric-topological interaction model of collective behavior. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222(17):3041-3049.
30. Parsons A.J., Thornley J.H., Newman J., Penning P.D. A mechanistic model of some physical determinants of intake rate and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward. Functional Ecology 1994, 187-204.
31. Pillot M.H., Gautrais J., Gouello J., Michelena P., Bon R. Moving together: incidental leaders and naïve followers. Behavioural Processes 2010, 83(3):235-241.
32. Pillot M.H., Gautrais J., Arrufat P., Couzin I.D., Bon R., Deneubourg J.L. Scalable rules for coherent group motion in a gregarious vertebrate. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(1):e14487.
33. Pratt S.C., Mallon E.B., Sumpter D.J., Franks N.R. Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2002, 52(2):117-127.
34. Reaney L.T., Backwell P.R. Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18(3):521-525.
35. Reebs S.G. Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Animal Behaviour 2000, 59(2):403-409.
36. Romanczuk P., Schimansky-Geier L. Swarming and pattern formation due to selective attraction and repulsion. Interface Focus 2012, 2(6):746-756.
37. Sibbald A.M., Hooper R.J. Sociability and the willingness of individual sheep to move away from their companions in order to graze. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2004, 86(1):51-62.
38. Sueur C., Petit O., Deneubourg J.L. Selective mimetism at departure in collective movements of Macaca tonkeana: an experimental and theoretical approach. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78(5):1087-1095.
39. Sumpter D.J.T. The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 361(1465):5-22.
40. Vicsek T., Zafeiris A. Collective motion. Physics Reports 2012, 517:71-140.
41. Vicsek T., Czirók A., Ben-Jacob E., Cohen I., Shochet O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters 1995, 75(6):1226-1229.
42. Ward A.J.W., Sumpter D.J.T., Couzin I.D., Hart P.J., Krause J. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(19):6948-6953.
43. Wittemyer G., Douglas-Hamilton I., Getz W.M. The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Animal Behaviour 2005, 69(6):1357-1371.
44. Woolf A., O'Shea T., Gilbert D.L. Movements and behavior of bighorn sheep on summer ranges in Yellowstone National Park. The Journal of Wildlife Management 1970, 446-450.