Hydraulic fracturing and organic compounds - Uses, disposal and challenges

SPE Eastern Regional Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 287-297

  Carter, Kimberly E ^a   Hakala, J Alexandra ^a   Hammack, Richard W ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION/DESORPTION; CHEMICAL ADDITIVE; CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING; HYDRAULIC FRACTURING PROCESS; NATURALLY OCCURRING; PRODUCED WATER TREATMENTS; SYNTHETIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

CHEMICAL WATER TREATMENT; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FRACTURING FLUIDS; LIFE CYCLE; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; SHALE; WATER INJECTION;

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING;

EID: 84888102679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Aminto, A. and M. S. Olson (2012). Four-compartment partition model of hazardous components in hydraulic fracturing fluid additives. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 7: 16-21.
2. Arthur, J. D., B. Bohm, et al. (23-25 March 2009). Evaluating Implications of Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs. SPE Americas E&P Environmental and Safety Conference. San Antonio, TX, USA, SPE International 121038: 1-15.
3. Arthur, J. D., M. Uretsky, et al. (2010). Water Resources and Use for Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus Shale Region. Water Resource Issues in the Marcellus Shale Region, ALL Consulting: 1-22.
4. Chen, Z., N. I. Khan, et al. (2007). Elimination of chloride interference on arsenic speciation in ion chromatography inductively coupled mass spectrometry using an octopole collision/reaction system. Microchemical Journal 87: 87-90.
5. Clark, C. E., A. J. Burnham, et al. (2012). The Technology and policy of hydraulic fracturing and potential environmental impacts of shale gas development. Environmental Practice 14(4): 249-261.
6. Haluszczak, L. O., A. W. Rose, et al. (2013). Geochemical evaluation of flowback brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania, USA. Applied Geochemistry 28: 55-61.
7. Hickenbottom, K. L., N. T. Hancock, et al. (2012). Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations. Desalination: 7.
8. Jenner, S. and A. J. Lamadrid (2013). Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water and land in the United States. Energy Policy 53: 442-453.
9. Kargbo, D. M., R. G. Wilhelm, et al. (2010). Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities. Environmental Science and Technology 44: 5679-5684.
10. Lee, D. S., J. D. Herman, et al. (2011). A critical evaluation of unconventional gas recovery from the Marcellus Shale, Northeastern United States. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 15(4): 679-687.
11. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR) and State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations (2011). Louisiana Hydraulic Fracturing State Review. www.strongerinc.org: 1-25.
12. Lutz, B. D., A. N. Lewis, et al. (2013). Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus Shale gas development. Water Resources Research 49.
13. Mitchell, A. L. and E. A. Casman (2011). Economic incentives and regulatory framework for shale gas well site reclamation in Pennsylvania. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 9506-9514.
14. Myers, T. (2012). Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers. Ground Water 50(6): 872-882.
15. National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (May 2012). In Fracking's Wake: New Rules are Needed to Protect Our Health and Environment from Contaminated Wastewater. www.nrdc.org NRDC Document D:12-05-A: 1-113.
16. Nicot, J.-P. and B. R. Scanlon (2012). Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, U.S. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 3580-3586.
17. Ohio Department of Natural Resources Mineral Resources Management (ODNR) and State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental (2011). Ohio Hydraulic Fracturing State Review. www.strongerinc.org. Regulations: 1-31.
18. Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC) Oil and Gas Conservation Division and State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations (2011). Oklahoma Hydraulic Fracturing State Review. www.strongerinc.org: 1-28.
19. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) and State Review of Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Regulations (2010). Pennsylvania Hydraulic Fracturing State Review. www.strongerinc.org: 1-40.
20. Rahim, Z. and S. A. Holditch (2003). Effects of fracture fluid degradation on underground fracture dimensions and production increase. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 37: 97-111.
21. Rahm, B. G. and S. J. Riha (2012). Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environmental Science and Policy 17: 12-23.
22. Rahm, D. (2011). Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas. Energy Policy 39: 2974-2981.
23. Soeder, D. J., Ed. (2012). Shale gas development in the United States. Advances in Natural Gas Technology, www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in- natural-gas-technology/the-expansion-of-unconventional-production-of-natural- gas-tight-gas-gas-shale-and-coal-bed-methane, InTech.
24. Soeder, D. J. and W. M. Kappel (2009). Water Resources and Natural Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale. U. S. G. Survey. Baltimore, MD: 1-6.
25. Spellman, F. R. (2012). Environmental Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing. London, GBR, Engineering.
26. Stephenson, T., J. E. Valle, et al. (2011). Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 10757-10764.
27. Suarez, A. A., Ed. (2012). The expansion of unconventional production of natural gas (tight gas, gas shale and coal bed methane). Advances in Natural Gas Technology. www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-natural-gas-technology/the- expansion-of-unconventional-production-of-natural-gas-tight-gas-gas-shale-and- coal-bed-methane, InTech.
28. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (June 2008). Annual Energy Outlook 2008 with Projections to 2030. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emceu/aer/ resource.html.
29. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (September 2012). Annual Energy Review. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/aer.pdf.
30. U.S. Department of Agriculture (DOA) (2011). Chloride Concentration Gradients in Tank-Stored Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids Following Flowback. Northern Research Station Research Paper-NRS-14, www.nrs.fs.fed.us: 1-14.
31. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2009). State Oil and Natural Gas Regulations Designed to Protect Water Resources. www.gwpc.org/sites/default/ files/state-oil-and-gas-regulations-designed-to-protect-water-resources-0.pdf. Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory: 1-64.
32. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) (2009). Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/ publications/EPreports/Shale-Gas-Primer-2009.pdf: 1-96.
33. U.S. House of Representatives (2011). Chemicals Used In Hydraulic Fracturing. Committee on Energy and Commerce Minority Staff, http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ Hydraulic%20Fracturing%20Report%204.19.11.pdf. Accessed December 2012: 1-30.
34. Veil, J. A. (2010). Water Management Technologies Used by Marcellus Shale Gas Producers. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory: 1-56.
35. Veil, J. A., G. Puder, et al. (2004). A white paper describing produced water from production of crude oil, natural gas, and coal bed methane. Argonne National Laboratory.
36. www.fracfocus.org (2012). Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Product Component Information Disclosures.