Are colorful males of great tits Parus major better parents? Parental investment is a matter of quality

Acta Oecologica

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 23-28

  Pagani Núñez, Emilio ^a   Senar, Juan Carlos ^a  

^a Museu de Zoologia   (Spain)

Author keywords

Arachnids; Carotenoids; Evergreen forests; Nestling diet; Ornaments; Parental investment

Indexed keywords

COLOR; EVERGREEN FOREST; MATE CHOICE; NESTLING; PARENT-OFFSPRING INTERACTION; PARENTAL CARE; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; PASSERINE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

ARACHNIDA; ARANEAE; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 84888088278     PISSN: 1146609X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2013.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Andersson S., Prager M. Quantifying colors. Bird Coloration 2006, vol. 1:41-89. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
3. Ardia D.R. Super size me: an experimental test of the factors affecting lipid content and the ability of residual body mass to predict lipid stores in nestling European Starlings. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:414-420.
4. Arnold K.E., Ramsay S.L., Donaldson C., Adam A. Parental prey selection affects risk-taking behaviour and spatial learning in avian offspring. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:2563-2569.
5. Arnold K.E., Ramsay S.L., Henderson L., Larcombe S. Seasonal variation in diet quality: antioxidants, invertebrates and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 99:708-717.
6. Balenger S.L., Scott-Johnson L., Brubaker J.L., Ostlind E. Parental effort in relation to structural plumage coloration in the mountain bluebird (Sialia currucoides). Ethology 2007, 113:838-846.
7. Banbura J., Blondel J., Wilde-Lambrechts H., Galan M.J., Maistre M. Nestling diet variation in an insular Mediterranean population of blue tits Parus caeruleus: effects of years, territories and individuals. Oecologia 1994, 100:413-420.
8. Blondel J., Dervieux A., Maistre M., Perret P. Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and schlerophyllous habitats. Oecologia 1991, 88:9-14.
9. Casagrande S., Csermely D., Pini E., Bertacche V., Tagliavini J. Skin carotenoid concentration correlates with male hunting skill and territory quality in the kestrel Falco tinnunculus. J.Avian Biol. 2006, 37:190-196.
10. Catoni C., Peters A., Schaefer H.M. Life history trade-offs are influenced by the diversity, availability and interactions of dietary antioxidants. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76:1107-1119.
11. Czeczuga B. Studies on carotenoids in spiders (Araneina, Arachnoidea). Bulletin de l'Academie polonaise des sciences. Serie des sci. biol. 1979, 27:803-805.
12. Danchin E., Giraldeau L.A., Cézilly F. Behavioural Ecology 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Eeva T., Helle S., Salminen J., Hakkarainen H. Carotenoid composition of invertebrates consumed by two insectivorous bird species. J.Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36:608-613.
14. Ferns P.N., Hinsley S.A. Carotenoid plumage hue and chroma signal different aspects of individual and habitat quality in tits. Ibis 2008, 150:152-159.
15. Figueroa D.P., Sabat P., Torres-Contreras H., Veloso C., Canals M. Participation of book lungs in evaporative water loss in Paraphysa parvula, a migalomorph spider from Chilean Andes. J.Insect Physiol. 2010, 56:731-735.
16. Figuerola J., Pascual J., Senar J.C. The use of a colorimeter in field studies of Blue Tit Parus caeruleus coloration. Ardea 1999, 87:269-275.
17. Figuerola J., Senar J.C. Measurement of plumage badges: an evaluation of methods used in the Great Tit Parus major. Ibis 2000, 142:482-484.
18. Figuerola J., Senar J.C. Seasonal changes in carotenoid- and melanin-based plumage coloration in the Great Tit Parus major. Ibis 2005, 147:797-802.
19. Fitze P.S., Kölliker M., Richner H. Effects of common origin and common environment on nestling plumage coloration in the great tit (Parus major). Evolution 2003, 57:144-150.
20. García-Navas V., Sanz J.J. Seasonal decline in provisioning effort and nestling mass of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus: experimental support for the parent quality hypothesis. Ibis 2011, 153:59-69.
21. García-Navas V., Ferrer E.S., Sanz J.J. Plumage yellowness predicts foraging ability in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 106:418-429.
22. García-Navas V., Ferrer E.S., Sanz J.J. Prey Choice, provisioning behaviour, and effects of early nutrition on nestling phenotype of titmice. Ecoscience 2013, 20:9-18.
23. Germain R.R., Reudink M.W., Marra P.P., Ratcliffe L.M. Carotenoid-based male plumage predicts parental investment in the American redstart. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2010, 122:318-325.
24. Griggio M., Zanollo V., Hoi H. Female ornamentation, parental quality, and competitive ability in the rock sparrow. J.Ethol. 2010, 28:455-462.
25. Hill G.E. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 1991, 350:337-339.
26. Hill G.E. Proximate basis of variation in carotenoid pigmentation in male House Finches. Auk 1992, 109:1-12.
27. Hill G.E., Montgomerie R. Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 1994, 258:47-52.
28. Hill G.E., McGraw K.J. Bird Coloration. Mechanisms and Measurements 2006, vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
29. Hoelzer G.A. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 1989, 38:1067-1078.
30. Huggins K., Navara K., Mendonça M., Hill G. Detrimental effects of carotenoid pigments: the dark side of bright coloration. Naturwissenschaften 2010, 97:637-644.
31. Limbourg T., Mateman A.C., Lessells C.M. Opposite differential allocation by males and females of the same species. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9. 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0835.
32. Linville S.U., Breitwisch R., Schilling A.J. Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55:119-127.
33. Magrath M.J.L., van Lieshout E., Visser G.H., Komdeur J. Nutritional bias as a new mode of adjusting sex allocation. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:S347-S349.
34. Mateos-González F., Quesada J., Senar J.C. Sexy birds are superior at solving a foraging problem. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7:668-669.
35. Matessi G., Carmagnani C., Griggio M., Pilastro A. Male rock sparrows differentially allocate nest defence but not food provisioning to offspring. Behaviour 2009, 146:209-223.
36. Mitchell D.P., Dunn P.O., Whittingham L.A., Freeman-Gallant C.R. Attractive males provide less parental care in two populations of the common yellowthroat. Anim. Behav. 2007, 73:165-170.
37. Moss J.E. The natural control of the cabbage caterpillars, Pieris spp. J.Anim. Ecol. 1933, 2:210-231.
38. Naef-Daenzer B., Keller L.F. The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P.caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. J.Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68:708-718.
39. Naef-Daenzer L., Naef-Daenzer B., Nager R.G. Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Great Tits Parus major in relation to food availability. J.Avian Biol. 2000, 31:206-214.
40. Norris K.J. Female choice and the quality of parental care in the great tit Parus major. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1990, 27:275-281.
41. Pagani-Núñez E., Ruiz I., Quesada J., Negro J.J., Senar J.C. The diet of Great Tit Parus major nestlings in a Mediterranean Iberian forest: the important role of spiders. Anim. Biodiver. Conserv. 2011, 34:355-361.
42. Parry D.A. On the drinking of soil capillary water by spiders. J.Exp. Biol. 1954, 31:218-227.
43. Partali V., Liaaen-Jensen S., Slagsvold T., Lifjeld J.T. Carotenoids in food chain studies-II. The food chain of Parus spp. monitored by carotenoid analysis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Comp. Biochem. 1987, 87:885-888.
44. Perrins C.M. British Tits 1979, Collins, London.
45. Pilastro A., Griggio M., Matessi G. Male rock sparrows adjust their breeding strategy according to female ornamentation: parental or mating investment?. Anim. Behav. 2003, 66:265-271.
46. Préault M., Chastel O., Cézilly F., Faivre B. Male bill colour and age are associated with parental abilities and breeding performance in blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005, 58:497-505.
47. Price T.D., Schluter D., Heckman N.E. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 48:187-211.
48. Quesada J., Senar J.C. Comparing plumage colour measurements obtained directly from live birds and from collected feathers: the case of the great tit Parus major. J.Avian Biol. 2006, 37:609-616.
49. Quesada J., Senar J.C. The role of melanin- and carotenoid-based plumage coloration in nest defence in the Great Tit. Ethology 2007, 113:640-647.
50. Radford A.N., McCleery R., Woodburn R.J.W. Activity patterns of parent Great Tits Parus major feeding their young during rainfall. Bird Study 2001, 48:214-220.
51. Ramsay S.L., Houston D.C. Amino acid composition of some woodland arthropods and its implications for breeding tits and other passerines. Ibis 2003, 145:227-232.
52. Rohde P.A., Johnsen A., Lifjeld J.T. Female plumage coloration in the Bluethroat: no evidence for an indicator of maternal quality. Condor 1999, 101:96-104.
53. Royama T. Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and brood size in nestling great tits (Parus major). Ibis 1966, 108:313-347.
54. Raubenheimer D. Toward a quantitative nutritional ecology: the right-angled mixture triangle. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81:407-427.
55. Sætre G.P., Fossnes T., Slagsvold T. Food provisioning in the pied flycatcher: do females gain direct benefits from choosing bright-colored males?. J.Anim. Ecol. 1995, 64:21-30.
56. Senar J.C., Escobar D. Carotenoid derived plumage coloration in the siskin Carduelis spinus is related to foraging ability. Avian Sci. 2002, 2:19-24.
57. Senar J.C., Figuerola J., Pascual J. Brighter yellow blue tits make better parents. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 2002, 269:257-261.
58. Senar J.C., Figuerola J., Domènech J. Plumage coloration and nutritional condition in the Great tit Parus major: the roles of carotenoids and melanins differ. Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90:234-237.
59. Senar J.C., Negro J.J., Quesada J., Ruiz I., Garrido J. Two pieces of information in a single trait?: the yellow breast of the Great Tit reflects both pigment acquisition and body condition. Behaviour 2008, 145:1195-1210.
60. Sillanpää S., Salminen J.P., Eeva T. Breeding success and lutein availability in great tit (Parus major). Acta Oecol. 2009, 35:805-810.
61. Slagsvold T., Lifjeld J.T. Variation in plumage colour of the Great Tit Parus major in relation to habitat, season and food. J.Zool. 1985, 206:321-328.
62. Suorsa P., Helle H., Huhta E., Jantti A., Nikula A., Hakkarainen H. Forest fragmentation is associated with primary brood sex ratio in the treecreeper (Certhia familiaris). Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:2215-2222.
63. Svensson L. Identification Guide to European Passerines 1992, L. Svensson, Stockholm. fourth ed.
64. Tinbergen J.M., Boerlijst M.C. Nestling weight and survival in individual great tits (Parus major). J.Anim. Ecol. 1990, 59:1113-1127.
65. Wolf J.B., Moore A.J., Brodie E.D. The evolution of indicator traits for parental quality: the role of maternal and paternal effects. Am. Nat. 1997, 150:639-649.