From paper-based to electronic guidelines: Application to french guidelines

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2001, Pages 196-200

  Gillois, Pierre ^a,b   Chatellier, Gilles ^a   Jaulent, Marie Christine ^a   Colombet, Isabelle ^a   Fieschi, Marius ^c   Degoulet, Patrice ^a  

^a SPIM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

algorithm; Practice Guideline; software

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTABILITY AND DECIDABILITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION TREES;

ELECTRONIC FORMS; EXTERNAL VALIDITIES; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; INTERNET BASED; LOGICAL ERRORS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TERMINAL NODES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION TREE; FRANCE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DECISION TREES; FRANCE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84888061657     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-196     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Pooles F. Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel? BMJ 1998;317(7162): 862-3.
2. URX: http: //text.nlm.nih.gov/
3. URL: http: //www.anaes.fr
4. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995;274(22): 1800-4.
5. Lobach DF, Kerner N A systematic process for converting text-based guidelines into a linear algorithm for electronic implementation. Proc AMIA Symp 2000;(20 Suppl): 507-11
6. Bernstam E, Ash N, Peleg M, Boxwala A, Mork P, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH, Tu S Guideline classification to assist modeling, authoring, implementation and retrieval. Proc AMIA Symp 2000;(20 Suppl): 66-70
7. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy SN, Jain NL, Tu SW, Oliver DE, et al. The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines JAMIA 1998;5(4): 357-72.
8. Gueyffier F, Boutitie F, Boissel JP, Coope J, Cutler J, Ekbom T, et al. INDANA: a meta-analysis on individual patient data in hypertension. Protocol and preliminary results. Therapie 1995;50(4): 353-62.
9. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1992;268(17): 2420-5.
10. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997; 277(6): 488-94.
11. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G. Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995;274(7): 570-4.
12. Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A metaanalysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. JAMIA 1996;3(6): 399-409.
13. Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the "evidence" of "evidence-based medicine". Am J Med 1997;103(6): 529-35.
14. Shankar RD, Musen MA. Justification of automated decision-making: medical explanations as medical arguments. Proc AMIA Symp 1999: 395-9.
15. Liu JC, Shiffman RN. Operationalization of clinical practice guidelines using fuzzy logic. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 7997: 283-7.