Functional regulatory spaces

Policy Sciences

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 311-333

  Varone, Frédéric ^a   Nahrath, Stéphane ^b   Aubin, David ^c   Gerber, Jean David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b Institut Universitaire Kurt Bosch   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

(Super) wicked problems; Airspace; Multi level governance; Policy subsystem; Territory; Water resource

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY ANALYSIS; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TERRITORY; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 84888058482     PISSN: 00322687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-013-9174-1     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aligica, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2012). Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond. Governance, 25(2), 237-262.
2. Australian Government. (2007). Tackling wicked problems. A public policy perspective. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia.
3. Barbieri, D. (2006). Transnational networks meet national hierarchies: The case of Italian competition and environment agencies. In M. Egeberg (Ed.), Multilevel Union administration: The transformation of executive politics in Europe (pp. 180-193). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
4. Bartley, T. (2011). Transnational governance as the layering of rules: Intersections of public and private standards. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12(2), 517-542.
5. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(1), 137-164.
7. Boerzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. In C. Radaelli & K. Featherstone (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 57-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13(1), 1-44.
9. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. -C., & Passeron, J -C (1991). The craft of sociology. Epistemological preliminaries. Berlin: de Gruyter.
10. Brandsma, G. J. (2010). Backstage Europe. Comitology, accountability and democracy in the European Union. Utrecht University PhD Thesis.
11. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Briassoulis, H. (Ed.). (2005). Policy integration for complex environmental problems: The example of mediterranean desertification. Aldershot: Ashgate.
13. Buck, S. J. (1998). The global commons. An introduction. Wahington, DC: Island Press.
14. Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and network. Political Geography, 24(8), 875-902.
15. Bulmer, S., & Lequesne, C. (Eds.). (2005). Member states and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Carter, C., & Smith, A. (2008). Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: "territorial institutionalism", fisheries and wine. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(2), 263-281.
17. Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole-of government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
18. Christiansen, T., & Larsson, T. (2008). The role of committees in the policy-process of the European Union. Legislation, implementation and deliberation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19. Coen, D., & Héritier, A. (Eds.). (2005). Refining regulatory regimes. Utilities in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
20. Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93-97.
21. Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology?. London: Hutchinson.
22. Enderlein, H., Wälti, S., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook on multi-level governance. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
23. Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1999). The new democratic federalism for Europe. Functional, overlapping, and competing jurisdictions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24. Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (2001). Metropolitan governance for the future: Functional overlapping competing jurisdictions. Swiss Political Science Review, 7(3), 124-130.
25. Frisken, F., & Norris, D. F. (2001). Regionalism reconsidered. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 467-478.
26. Gilardi, F. (2008). Delegation in the regulatory state: Independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
27. Graziano, P., & Vink, M. (Eds.). (2007). Europeanization. New research agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
28. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243.
29. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010). Types of multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 17-31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
30. Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Convergence and divergence in "New Governance" arrangements: Evidence from European integrated natural resource strategies. Journal of Public Policy, 26(2), 167-189.
31. Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42, 73-89.
32. Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303-327.
33. Jones, K. T. (1998). Scale as epistemology. Political Geography, 17(1), 25-28.
34. Jones, M. D., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (2009). Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 37-58.
35. Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe. London: Edward Elgar.
36. Khagram, S., Waddell, S., Biermann, F., & Mol, A. P. J. (2007). Multi-stakeholder global networks: Emerging systems for the global common good. In P. Glasbergen (Ed.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 261-287). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
37. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255-280.
38. Knoepfel, P. (1995). New institutional arrangements for a new generation of environmental policy instruments: Intra- and Interpolicy Co-operation. In Bruno Dente (Ed.), Environmental policy in search of new instruments. Dodrecht: Kluwer.
39. Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities: Social conflicts and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152.
41. Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80(4), 615-642.
42. Luhmann, N. (2006). System as difference. Organization, 13(1), 37-57.
43. Maggetti, M. (2009). Delegated authority: Legitimizing independent regulatory agencies. In I. Blühdorn (Ed.), In search of legitimacy. Policy making in Europe and the challenge of complexity. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Verlag.
44. Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its accountability problems. West European Politics22(1).
45. Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242.
46. May, P. J. (2007). Regulatory regimes and accountability. Regulation & Governance, 1(1), 8-26.
47. McGinnis, M. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169-183.
48. McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Will lessons from small-scale social dilemmas scale up? In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Garling, & M. Gustafson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 189-211). Berlin: Springer.
49. Montpetit, E. (2002). Policy networks, federal arrangements, and the development of environmental regulations: a comparison of the Canadian and American agricultural sectors. Governance, 15(1), 1-20.
50. Nohrstedt, D. & Weible, C. (2010). The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1(2), 1-32.
51. Nahrath, S., & Varone, F. (2007). Les espaces fonctionnels comme changements d'échelles de l'action publique. In A. Faure, J.-P. Leresche, P. Muller, & S. Nahrath (Eds.), Action publique et changements d'échelles: les nouvelles focales du politique (pp. 235-249). Paris: L'Harmattan.
52. Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 557-571.
53. Office fédéral de la statistique. (2010). Swiss Civil Aviation 2009. Neuchâtel: OFS/OFAC.
54. Orr, S. K. (2006). Policy subsystems and regimes: Organized interests and climate change policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 34(2), 147-169.
55. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Robert Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831-842.
57. Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (1997). Neither markets or states: Linking transformation processes in collective action arenas. In D. Mueller (Ed.), Perspective on public choice: A handbook (pp. 35-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi-level governance: A historical and conceptual analysis. European integration, 31(2), 163-180.
59. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemnas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
60. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalitions approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
61. Scharpf, F. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 27-53.
62. Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institution, 18(1), 89-110.
63. Stern, P. C. (2011). Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 213-232.
64. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. (Eds.). (1985). Private interest Government. Beyond market and state. London: Sage.
65. Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water. Flows of power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Weber, M. (1997 (1903-1917)). The methodology of the social sciences, New York: Free Press.
67. Young, O. R. (1994). The problem of scale in human/environment relationships. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(4), 429-447.
68. Young, O. R. (2006). Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society11(1): 27. http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss1/art27/. Accessed March 19, 2007.
69. Young, O. R. (2008). Choosing governance systems: A plea for comparative research. In M. Rein, R. E. Goodin, & M. Moran (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 844-857). Oxford: Oxford University Press.