Assessment of diffusion parameters by intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 26, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1806-1814

  Marzi, Simona ^a   Piludu, Francesca ^a   Vidiri, Antonello ^a  

^a REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Diffusion weighted imaging; Head and neck cancer; Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging; Quantitative imaging; Tumor delineation

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTIONS; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; TUMOR DELINEATION;

ESTIMATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TUMORS;

DIFFUSION;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPOPHARYNX CARCINOMA; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION IMAGING; LARYNX CARCINOMA; MALE; NASOPHARYNX CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OROPHARYNX CARCINOMA; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGING; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE IMAGING; TUMOR DELINEATION;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; NASOPHARYNX; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84888042868     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3020     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Razek AA. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2010; 34: 808-815.
2. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck. Radiology, 2012; 263: 19-32.
3. Quon H, Brizel DM. Predictive and prognostic role of functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2012; 22: 220-232.
4. Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H, Sherman E, Weinstein G, Kilger A, Poptani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 986-994.
5. Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F, Op de Beeck K, Vander Poorten V, Hauben E, Lambrecht M, Nuyts S, Hermans R. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to monitor treatment response in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012; 82: 1098-1107.
6. Wang Z, Su MY, Najafi A, Nalcioglu O. Effect of vasodilator hydralazine on tumor microvascular random flow and blood volume as measured by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) weighted MRI in conjunction with Gd-DTPA-albumin enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2001; 19: 1063-1072.
7. Lemke A, Laun FB, Simon D, Stieltjes B, Schad LR. An in vivo verification of the intravoxel incoherent motion effect in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 64: 1580-1585.
8. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology, 1988; 168: 497-505.
9. Le Bihan D, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 27: 171-178.
10. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Desbleds MT, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Roger B. Contribution of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging to neuroradiology. J. Neuroradiol. 1987; 14: 295-312.
11. Neil JJ, Bosch CS, Ackerman JJ. An evaluation of the sensitivity of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) method of blood flow measurement to changes in cerebral blood flow. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994; 32: 60-65.
12. Koh DM, Collins DJ, Orton MR. Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: reality and challenges. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 1351-1361.
13. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, Nhieu JT, Mallat A, Ruel L, Laurent A, Deux JF, Brugieres P, Rahmouni A. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging - pilot study. Radiology, 2008; 249: 891-899.
14. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, Finn M, Moccaldi M, Jensen JH, Sodickson DK, Goldberg JD, Formenti S, Moy L. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011; 65: 1437-1447.
15. Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Kruecker J, Kadoury S, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013; 69: 553-562.
16. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology, 2012; 263: 770-777.
17. Lu Y, Jansen JFA, Mazaheri Y, Stanbuk HE, Koutcher JA, Shulka-Dave A. Extension of the intravoxel incoherent motion model to non-gaussian diffusion in head and neck cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2012; 36: 1088-1096.
18. Tshering Vogel DW, Zbaeren P, Geretschlaeger A, Vermathen P, De Keyzer F, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging including bi-exponential fitting for the detection of recurrent or residual tumour after (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Eur. Radiol. 2013; 23: 562-569.
19. Sumi M, Nakamura T. Head and neck tumors: assessment of perfusion-related parameters and diffusion coefficients based on the intravoxel incoherent motion model. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013; 34: 410-416.
20. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia, 2009; 11: 102-125.
21. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2011; 29: 766-776.
22. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2012; 30: 1323-1341.
23. Kim S, Decarlo L, Cho GY, Jensen JH, Sodickson DK, Moy L, Formenti S, Schneider RJ, Goldberg JD, Sigmund EE. Interstitial fluid pressure correlates with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging metrics in a mouse mammary carcinoma model. NMR Biomed. 2012; 25: 787-794.
24. Byrd RH, Gilbert JC, Nocedal J. A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math. Programming, 2000; 89: 149-185.
25. Pekar J, Moonen CT, van Zijl PC. On the precision of diffusion/perfusion imaging by gradient sensitization. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 23: 122-129.
26. Marquardt D. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1963; 11: 431-441.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986; 1: 307-310.
28. Hermans R, Meijerink M, Van den Bogaert W, Rijnders A, Weltens C, Lambin P. Tumor perfusion rate determined noninvasively by dynamic computed tomography predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer after radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003; 57: 1351-1356.
29. Cao Y, Popovtzer A, Li D, Chepeha DB, Moyer JS, Prince ME, Worden F, Teknos T, Bradford C, Mukherji SK, Eisbruch A. Early prediction of outcome in advanced head-and-neck cancer based on tumor blood volume alterations during therapy: a prospective study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008; 72: 1287-1290.
30. Trojanowska A, Trojanowski P, Bisdas S, Staśkiewicz G, Drop A, Klatka J, Bobek-Billewicz B. Squamous cell cancer of hypopharynx and larynx - evaluation of metastatic nodal disease based on computed tomography perfusion studies. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012; 81: 1034-1039.
31. Shukla-Dave A, Lee NY, Jansen JF, Thaler HT, Stambuk HE, Fury MG, Patel SG, Moreira AL, Sherman E, Karimi S, Wang Y, Kraus D, Shah JP, Pfister DG, Koutcher JA. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of outcome in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with nodal metastases. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012; 82: 1837-1844.
32. Andreau A, Koh DM, Collins DJ, Blackledge M, Wallace T, Leach MO, Orton MR. Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur. Radiol. 2013; 23: 428-434.
33. Lee AWM, Lin JC, Ng WT. Current management of nasopharyngeal cancer. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2012; 22: 233-244.
34. Belbin TJ, Schlecht NF, Smith RV, Adrien LR, Kawachi N, Brandwein-Gensler M, Bergman A, Chen Q, Childs G, Prystowsky MB. Site-specific molecular signatures predict aggressive disease in HNSCC. Head Neck Pathol. 2008; 2: 243-256.
35. Lentsch EJ, Goudy S, Sosnowski J, Major S, Bumpous JM. Microvessel density in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma primary tumors and its correlation with clinical staging parameters. Laryngoscope, 2006; 116: 397-400.
36. Ito Y, Kamijo T, Yokose T, Kawashima M, Ogino T, Ikeda H, Hayashi R, Sasaki S, Ochiai A. Microvessel density predicts the radiosensitivity of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes. Int. J. Oncol. 2001; 19: 1127-1132.
37. Srinivasan A, Galbán CJ, Johnson TD, Chenevert TL, Ross BD, Mukherji SK. Utility of the k-means clustering algorithm in differentiating apparent diffusion coefficient values of benign and malignant neck pathologies. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2010; 31: 736-740.