An evaluation of the utility of the CEN categorial structure for nursing diagnoses as a terminology model for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2001, Pages 151-155

  Bakken, Suzanne ^a   Warren, Judith J ^b   Lundberg, Cynthia ^c   Casey, Anne ^d   Correia, Carol ^c   Konicek, Debra ^e   Zingo, Christine ^c  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United Kingdom)

^e Molecular Pathology Division   (United States)

Author keywords

concept representation; nursing; standands; terminologies

Indexed keywords

DISSECTION; SEMANTICS; TERMINOLOGY;

ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTORS; CONCEPT REPRESENTATION; NORTH AMERICAN; OMAHA SYSTEMS; POTENTIAL UTILITY; SEMANTIC CATEGORY; STANDANDS; TERMINOLOGY MODELS;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; LINGUISTICS; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; SEMANTICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

NURSING DIAGNOSIS; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TERMINOLOGY; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84888037171     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-151     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Brown PJB, Sonksen P. Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7(4): 392-403.
2. Cimino JJ. From data to knowledge through concept-oriented terminologies: Experience with the MED. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7(3): 288-297.
3. Huff SM, Carter JS. A characterization of terminology models, clinical templates, message models, and other kinds of clinical information models. International Medical Informatics Association Working Group 6 Conference on Natural Language and Medical Concept Representation; Phoenix, Arizona, 1999.
4. CEN-European Committee for Standardization. ENV 12264: Medical Informatics-Categorial Structures of Systems of Concepts-Model for Representation of Semantics. Brussels, Belgium: CEN-European Committee for Standardization; 1997.
5. Sowa J. Conceptual structures. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley; 1984.
6. Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A Logical Foundation for Representation of Clinical Data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994;1(3): 218-32.
7. Warren JJ, Mead CN, Button P, Androwich I, Henry SB. Development and evaluation of the Loose Canon Model of nursing interventions using Unified Modeling Language. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999: 1189.
8. Button P, Warren J, Bakken S, Androwich A, Mead C. Development of the Loose Cannon Model for Nursing Interventions. In: Saba V, Carr R, Sermeus W, Rocha P, editors. Nursing Informatics 2000. One Step Beyond: The Evolution of Technology and Nursing. Proceedings of the 7th IMIA International Conference on Nursing Use of Computers and Information Science. Auckland, New Zealand: adis International; 2000. p. 350-354.
9. Bakken S, Cashen MS, Mendonca E, O'Brien A, Zieniewicz J. Representing nursing activities within a concept-based terminologic system: evaluation of a type definition. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7(1): 81-90.
10. Hardiker N, Kirby J. A compositional approach to nursing terminology. In: Gerdin U, Tallberg M, Wainwright P, editors. Nursing Informatics: The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Health Care Informatics. Stockholm, Sweden: IOS Press; 1997. p. 3-7.
11. Mortensen RA, editor. ICNP and telelmatic applications for nurses in Europe: The Telenurse experience. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1999.
12. Hardiker NR, Rector AL. Modeling nursing terminology using the GRAIL representation language. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5(1): 120-128.
13. CEN-European Committee for Standardization. Health informatics-System of concepts to support nursing, 2000, CEN, Brussels.
14. Bakken S, Button P, Hardiker NR, Mead CN, Ozbolt JG, Warren JJ. On the path toward a reference terminology for nursing concepts. International Medical Informatics Association Working Group 6 Conference on Natural Language and Medical Concept Representation; Phoenix, Arizona, 1999.
15. International Standards Organization. Proposed Scope of Work: Integration of a reference terminology model for nursing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization; 1999.
16. Bakken S. Integrating nursing concepts into SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT. Presentation to the SNOMED Users Group. 1999.
17. Warren JJ, Hoskins LM. NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy: A nursing database. Nursing data Systems: The emerging framework. Washington DC: American Nurses Publishing, 1995.
18. Avant K. NANDA Taxonomy Committee Report. 13th Conference of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, 1998.
19. Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992.
20. Martin KS, Scheet NJ, Stegman MR. Home health clients: characteristics, outcomes of care, and nursing interventions. Am J Public Health 1993;83(12): 1730-1734.
21. Spackman KA, Campbell KE, Cote RA. SNOMED RT: A Reference Terminology for health care. Proc AMIA Symp. 1997: 640-644.