Challenges in the development and testing of a reference terminology model for nursing interventions

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2001, Pages 176-180

  Button, Patricia S ^a   Androwich, Ida ^b   Mead, Charles N ^c   Zingo, Christine ^d   Konicek, Debra ^e   Campbell, Keith E ^d  

^a IDX Systems Corporation   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Simeone Central   (United States)

^d KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^e SNOMED International   (United States)

Author keywords

Modeling; Nursing Interventions; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

MODELS; TERMINOLOGY;

CLINICAL INFORMATION; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR; DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; NURSING INTERVENTIONS; REFERENCE TERMINOLOGY MODELS; TERMINOLOGY MODELS; VOCABULARY;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING CARE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

MODELS, THEORETICAL; NURSING CARE; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 84888021133     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-928-8-176     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. HL7. 1999 Technical Steering Committee (s): Patient Care; Vocabulary; Modeling and Methodology. In: ; 2000.
2. Forrey A, McDonald, CJ, DeMoor, G, Huff, SM, Leaville, D, Leland, D, Fiers, T, Charles, L, Griffin, B, Stalling, F, Tullis, A, Hutchins, K, &Baenziger, J. Logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) datsbase: a public use set of codes and names for electronic reporting of clinical laboratory test results. Clinical Chemistry 1996;42: 81-90.
3. (ASTM) ASfTaM. Standard guide for construction of a clinical nomenclature for support of electronic health records. West Conshchocken, PA: Americal Society for Testing and Materials; 1998.
4. Jones D. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). Philadelphia, PA; 1999 June 1999.
5. Project II. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1999.
6. Project 10. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1999.
7. Saba V. Home health care classification (HHCC) of nursing diagnoses and interventions. In: AMIA Spring Institute: Implementation of nursing vocabularies in computer-based systems (an invitational working conference); 1997 May 28, 1997; San Jose, CA; 1997.
8. Martin K. The Omaha system: Past, present, and future. On-line Journal of Nursing Informatics 1999;3(l): l-6.
9. Grobe S. Nursing Intervention Lexicon &Taxonomy. Austin, Tx: University of Texas at Austin; 1999 June, 1999.
10. Kleinbeck S. In search of perioperative nursing data elements. AORN 1996;63(5): 926-31.
11. Ingenerf J. Taxonomic vocabularies in medicine: the intention of usage determines different established structures. In: MedInfo95; 1995; Vancouver, British Columbia; 1995. p. 136-9.
12. Henry SB, &Mead, C.N. Nursing classifications: Necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997;4(3): 222-232.
13. Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998(37): 394-403.
14. ICN. ICNP Update-Beta 1 Version. In:: ICN; 1999.
15. HardikerNR, AR. Modeling nursing terminology using the GRAIL representaton language. JAMIA 1998;5: 120-8.
16. CEN 12264. Medical informatics-Categorical structure of systems of concepts-Model for representation of semantics. Brussles; 1995 1995.
17. Ozbolt J. From minimum data to maximum impact: Using clinical data to strengthen patient care. MD Computing 1997;14: 295-301.
18. Ozbolt J. The Patient Care Data Set: Profile. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Medical Center; 1999.
19. Warren J.J. MCN, Button P., Androwich L, Henry S.B. Development of theLoose Canon Model of Nursing Interventions Represented Using UnifiedModel Language (UML). In: Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Asssociation; 1999. p. 1189.