Conservation Genetic Resources for Effective Species Survival (ConGRESS): Bridging the divide between conservation research and practice

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 433-437

  Hoban, Sean ^a   Arntzen, Jan W ^b   Bertorelle, Giorgio ^a   Bryja, Josef ^c   Fernandes, Margarida ^d   Frith, Katie ^e   Gaggiotti, Oscar ^f   Galbusera, Peter ^g   Godoy, José A ^h   Hauffe, Heidi C ⁱ   Rus Hoelzel, A ^e   Nichols, Richard A ^j   Pérez Espona, Sílvia ^j   Primmer, Craig ^k   Russo, Isa Rita M ^l   Segelbacher, Gernot ^m   Siegismund, Hans R ⁿ   Sihvonen, Marjatta ^k   Sjögren Gulve, Per ^o   Vernesi, Cristiano ⁱ   Vilà, Carles ^h   Bruford, Michael W ^l   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b NATURALIS BIODIVERSITY CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c INSTITUTE OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^d Instituto da Conservacao da Natureza   (Portugal)

^e DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^g CENTRE FOR RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION   (Belgium)

^h DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

ⁱ RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^j QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^l CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^o SWEDISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (Sweden)

more..

Author keywords

Capacity building; Conservation planning; Data; Decision making; Management; Online resource; Policy

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CAPACITY BUILDING; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN UNION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SURVIVAL;

EID: 84888003862     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2013.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allendorf F.W., Hohenlohe P.A., Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2010, 11:697-710.
2. Bertorelle G., Bruford M., Chemini C., Vernesi C., Hauffe H. New, flexible Bayesian approaches to revolutionize conservation genetics. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:584.
3. Bourke B.P., Frantz A.C., Lavers C.P., et al. Genetic signatures of population change in the British golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). Conservation Genetics 2010, 11:1837-1846.
4. DeSalle R., Amato G. The expansion of conservation genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2004, 5:702-712.
5. Fallon S.M. Genetic data and the listing of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology 2007, 21:1186-1195.
6. Frankham R. Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:1919-1927.
7. Githiru M., Lens L., Adriaensen F., Mwang'ombe J., Matthysen E. Using science to guide conservation: From landscape modelling to increased connectivity in the Taita Hills, Kenya. Journal for Nature Conservation 2011, 19:263-268.
8. Hoban S., Bertorelle G., Gaggiotti O.E. Computer simulations: Tools for population and evolutionary genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2012, 13:110-122.
9. Hoban S.M., Gaggiotti O.E., Bertorelle G. The number of markers and samples needed for detecting bottlenecks under realistic scenarios, with and without recovery: a simulation-based study. Molecular Ecology 2013, 22(13):3444-3450.
10. Hoban S.M., Gaggiotti O.E., ConGRESS, Bertorelle G. Sample Planning Optimization Tool for conservation and population Genetics (SPOTG): A software for choosing the appropriate number of markers and samples. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2013, 4:299-303.
11. Hoban S.M., Hauffe H.C., Perez-Espona S., et al. Bringing genetic diversity to the forefront of conservation policy and management. Conservation Genetics Resources 2013, 5:593-598.
12. Hoban S., Vernesi C. Challenges in global biodiversity conservation and solutions that cross sociology, politics, economics and ecology. Biology Letters 2012.
13. Howes B.J., Pither R., Prior K.A. Conservation implications should guide the application of conservation genetics research. Endangered Species Research 2009, 8:193-199.
14. Jones-Walters L., Cil A. Biodiversity and stakeholder participation. Journal for Nature Conservation 2011, 19:327-329.
15. Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Rouget M., et al. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology 2008, 22:610-617.
16. Laikre L. Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conservation Genetics 2010, 11:349-354.
17. Landguth E.L., Cushman S.S., Schwartz M.K., et al. Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology 2010, 19:4179-4191.
18. Laurance W.F., Koster H., Grooten M., et al. Making conservation research more relevant for conservation practitioners. Biological Conservation 2012, 153:164-168.
19. López-Hoffman L., Varady R.G., Flessa K.W., Balvanera P. Ecosystem services across borders: A framework for transboundary conservation policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2010, 8:84-91.
20. Osmond D.L., Nadkarni N.M., Driscoll C.T., et al. The role of interface organizations in science communication and understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2010, 8:306-313.
21. Pereira H.M., Ferrier S., Walters M., Geller G.N., Jongman R.H.G., Scholes R.J., et al. Essential Biodiversity Variables. Science 2013, 339:227-228.
22. Ryman N., Palm S., Andre C., et al. Power for detecting genetic divergence: Differences between statistical methods and marker loci. Molecular Ecology 2006, 15:2031-2045.
23. Santamaria L., Mèndez P.F. Evolution in biodiversity policy-current gaps and future needs. Evolutionary Applications 2012, 5:202-218.
24. Schwartz M.K., McKelvey K.S. Why sampling scheme matters: The effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conservation Genetics 2008, 10:441-452.
25. Smith R.J., Verissimo D., Leader-Williams N., Cowling R.M., Knight A.T. Let the locals lead. Nature 2009, 462:280-281.
26. Ten Brink P., Berghöfer A., Schröter-Schlaack C., et al. TEEB-The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers 2009, Welzel/Hardt, Wesseling, Germany.
27. Torkar G., Mcgregor S.L.T. Reframing the conception of nature conservation management by transdisciplinary methodology: From stakeholders to stakesharers. Journal for Nature Conservation 2012, 20:65-71.
28. Vähä J-P., Erkinaro J., Niemelä E., Primmer C.R. Life-history and habitat features influence the within-river genetic structure of Atlantic salmon. Molecular ecology 2007, 16:2638-2654.
29. Vasemägi A., Primmer C.R. Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: The promise of combining complementary research strategies. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:3623-3642.
30. Vernesi C., Bruford M.W., Bertorelle G., et al. Where's the conservation in conservation genetics?. Conservation Biology 2008, 22:802-804.