Somatic deleterious mutation rate in a woody plant: Estimation from phenotypic data

Heredity

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 338-344

  Bobiwash, K ^a   Schultz, S T ^b   Schoen, D J ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZADAR   (Croatia)

Author keywords

deleterious mutation; inbreeding depression; long lived plants; somatic mutation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; AUTOGAMY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; FRUIT SET; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; SHRUB; WOODY PLANT;

VACCINIUM; VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM;

ARTICLE; BLUEBERRY; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; FRUIT; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MUTATION RATE; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BLUEBERRY PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLOWERS; FRUIT; GENETIC FITNESS; INBREEDING; MUTATION RATE; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE DELETION;

EID: 84888003150     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.57     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ally D, Ritland K, Otto SP (2010). Aging in a long-lived clonal tree. PLoS Biol 8: e1000454.
2. Antolin MF, Strobeck C (1985). The population genetics of somatic mutation in plants. Am Nat 126: 52-62. (Pubitemid 17244203)
3. Baer CF, Miyamoto MM, Denver DR (2007). Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet 8: 619-631. (Pubitemid 47077282)
4. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley A (1996). The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Phil Trans R Soc Ser B 351: 1271-1280.
5. Bell DJ, Rowland LJ, Stommel J (2010). Yield variation among clones of lowbush blueberry as a function of genetic similarity and self-compatibility. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 135: 259-270.
6. Boches PS, Bassil NV (2005). Microsatellite markers for Vaccinium from EST and genomic libraries. Mol Ecol Res 5: 657-660. (Pubitemid 41716878)
7. Broyden CG (1970). The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. General considerations. IMA J Appl Math 6: 76-90.
8. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
9. Cloutier D, Rioux D, Beaulieu J, Schoen DJ (2003). Somatic stability of microsatellite loci in Eastern white pine, Pinus strobus L. Heredity 90: 247-252. (Pubitemid 36412968)
10. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF (1998). Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686. (Pubitemid 28180696)
11. Fletcher R (1970). A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comp J 13: 317-322.
12. Fletcher R, Reeves C (1964). Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Comp J 7: 149-154.
13. Gill DE, Chao L, Perkins SL, Wolf JB (1995). Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26: 423-444. (Pubitemid 3019633)
14. Glover JD, Culman SW, DuPont ST, Broussard W, Young L, Mangan ME et al. (2010). Harvested perennial grasslands provide ecological benchmarks for agricultural sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137: 3-12.
15. Goldfarb D (1970). A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math Comp 24: 23-26.
16. Haag-Liautard C, Coffey N, Houle D, Lynch M, Charlesworth B, Keightley PD (2008). Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol 6: 1706-1714.
17. Haldane JBS (1930). Theoretical genetics of autopolyploids. J Genet 22: 359-372.
18. Heim S (2007). svcm: 2d and 3sd Space-Varying Coefficient Models in R. R package version 0.1.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=svcm.
19. Hokanson K, Hancock J (1993). The common lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium, may be an autotetraploid. Can J Plant Sci 73: 889-891.
20. Hokanson K, Hancock J (2000). Early-acting inbreeding depression in three species of Vaccinium (Ericaceae). Sex Plant Reprod 13: 145-150.
21. Keightley PD (1994). The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 138: 1315-1322. (Pubitemid 24375274)
22. Klekowski EJ Jr (1988). Mutation, Developmental Selection, and Plant Evolution. Columbia University Press: New York.
23. Klekowski EJ Jr, Godfrey PJ (1989). Aging and mutation in plants. Nature 340: 389-390.
24. Klekowski EJ Jr, Kazarinova-Fukshansky NK, Mohr H (1985). Shoot apical meristems and mutation: Selective loss of advantageous cell genotypes. Am J Bot 71: 28-34.
25. Kondrashov AS (1988). Deleterious mutation and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-440.
26. Lynch M, Gabriel W (1990). Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44: 1725-1737.
27. McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputie A (2010). The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol 186: 318-332.
28. Morgan MT (2001). Consequences of life history for inbreeding depression and mating system evolution in plants. Proc Biol Sci. 268: 1817-1824. (Pubitemid 32844030)
29. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ (1956). An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data of consanguineous marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42: 855-863.
30. Mukai T (1964). The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 72: 333-355.
31. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. Comp J 7: 308-313.
32. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999). Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer: New York, USA.
33. O'Connell LM, Ritland K (2004). Somatic mutations at microsatellite loci in western Redcedar (Thuja plicata: Cupressaceae). J Hered 95: 172-176. (Pubitemid 38509735)
34. Otto SP, Orive ME (1995). Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 141: 1173-1187.
35. Otto SP, Hastings IM (1998). Mutation and selection within the individual. Genetica 102-103: 507-524. (Pubitemid 28371737)
36. Otto SP, Walbot V (1990). DNA methylation in eukaryotes: kinetics of demethylation and de novo methylation during the life cycle. Genetics 124: 429-437. (Pubitemid 20066112)
37. Pineda-Krch M, Lehtila K (2002). Cell lineage dynamics in stratified shoot apical meristems. J Theor Biol 219: 495-505. (Pubitemid 35355745)
38. R Core Team. (2012). R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN: Vienna, Austria, ISBN. 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
39. Schoen DJ, Bataillon TM, David JL (1998). Deleterious mutation accumulation and the regeneration of genetic resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 394.
40. Schultz ST, Scofield DG (2009). Mutation accumulation in real branches: fitness assays for genomic deleterious mutation rate and effect in large-statured plants. Am Nat 174: 163-175.
41. Scofield DG, Schultz ST (2006). Mitosis, stature, and evolution of plant mating systems: low-F and high-F plants. Proc Biol Sci 273: 275-282. (Pubitemid 46768072)
42. Scofield DG (2006). Medial pith cells per meter in twigs as a proxy for mitotic growth rate (F/m) in the apical meristem. Am J Bot 93: 1740-1747. (Pubitemid 46955062)
43. Shanno DF (1970). Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math Comp 24: 647-656.
44. Shanno DF, Kettler PC (1970). Optimal conditioning of Quasi-Newton methods. Math Comp 24: 657-664.
45. Simmons MJ, Crow JF (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Ann Rev Genet 11: 49-78.
46. Weir BS (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA.
47. Weismann A (1893). The germ-plasm: a theory of heredity. Charles Scribner's and Sons: New York.
48. Whitham TA, Slobodchikoff CN (1981). Evolution by individuals, plant/herbivoreinteractions, and mosaics of variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49: 287-292.