Post-hatching development of in vitro bovine embryos from day 7 to 14 in vivo versus in vitro

Molecular Reproduction and Development

Volumn 80, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 936-947

  Machado, G M ^a,b   Ferreira, A R ^c   Pivato, I ^b   Fidelis, A ^d   Spricigo, J F ^a,b   Paulini, F ^b   Lucci, C M ^b   Franco, M M ^a,d   Dode, M A ^a,b  

^a EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CD9 ANTIGEN; CYTOKERATIN 8; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER 1; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER 3; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HSP1A1 PROTEIN; MANGANESE SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE; TAU INTERFERON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EX VIVO GENE TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; HATCHING; IN VITRO GENE TRANSFER; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; UTERUS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; BOVINAE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

BOVINAE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; MALE; RNA, MESSENGER; UTERUS;

EID: 84887995841     PISSN: 1040452X     EISSN: 10982795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22230     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alexopoulos NI, French AJ. 2009. The prevalence of embryonic remnants following the recovery of post-hatching bovine embryos produced in vitro or by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 114:43-53.
2. Augustin R, Pocar P, Navarrete-Santos A, Wrenzycki C, Gandolfi F, Niemann H, Fischer B. 2001. Glucose transporter expression is developmentally regulated in vitro derived bovine preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 60:370-376.
3. Balasubramanian S, Son WJ, Mohana Kumar B, Ock SA, Yoo JG, Im GS, Choe SY, Rho GJ. 2007. Expression pattern of oxygen and stress-responsive gene transcripts at various developmental stages of in vitro and in vivo preimplantation bovine embryos. Theriogenology 68:265-275.
4. Bertolini M, Beam SW, Shim H, Bertolini LR, Moyer AL, Famula TR, Anderson GB. 2002. Growth, development, and gene expression by in vivo- and in vitro-produced day 7 and 16 bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 63:318-328.
5. Brandão DO, Hyttel P, Lovendahl P, Rumpf R, Stringfellow D, Callesen H. 2004. Post hatching development: A novel system for extended in vitro culture of bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 71:2048-2055.
6. Carolan C, Lonergan P, Van langendonckt A, Mermillod P. 1995. Factors affecting bovine embryo development in synthetic oviduct fluid following oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Theriogenology 43:1115-1128.
7. Castro Neto AS, Sanches BV, Binelli M, Seneda MM, Perri SH, Garcia JF. 2005. Improvement in embryo recovery using double uterine flushing. Theriogenology 63:1249-1255.
8. Clemente M, De la Fuente J, Fair T, Naib AAL, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Roche JF, Rizos D, Lonergan P. 2009. Progesterone and conceptus elongation in cattle: A direct effect on the embryo or an indirect effect via the endometrium? Reproduction 138:507-517.
9. Clemente M, Lopez-Vidriero I, O'Garoa P, Mehta JP, Forde N, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Lonergan P, Rizos D. 2011. Transcriptome changes at the initiation of elongation in the bovine conceptus. Biol Reprod 85:285-295.
10. Corrêa GA, Rumpf R, Mundim TC, Franco MM, Dode MA. 2008. Oxygen tension during in vitro culture of bovine embryos: Effect in production and expression of genes related to oxidative stress. Anim Reprod Sci 104:132-142.
11. Christopher Luft J, Dix DJ. 1999. Hsp70 expression and function during embryogenesis. Cell Stress Chaperon 4:162-170.
12. de Oliveira AT, Lopes RF, Rodrigues JL. 2005. Gene expression and developmental competence of bovine embryos produced in vitro under varying embryo density conditions. Theriogenology 64:1559-1572.
13. Diskin MG, Morris DG. 2008. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants. Reprod Domest Anim 43:260-267.
14. Ehrhardt RA, Bell AW. 1997. Developmental increases in glucose transporter concentration in the sheep placenta. Am J Physiol 273:1132-1141.
15. El-sayed A, Hoelker M, Rings F, Salilew D, Jennen D, Tholen E, Sirard MA, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. 2006. Large-scale transcriptional analysis of bovine embryo biopsies in relation to pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. Physiol Genomics 8:84-96.
16. Fischer-Brown AE, Lindsey BR, Ireland FA, Northey DL, Monson RL, Clark SG, Wheeler MB, Kesler DJ, Lane SJ, Weigel KA, Rutledge JJ. 2004. Embryonic disc development and subsequent viability of cattle embryos following culture in two media under two oxygen concentrations. Reprod Fertil Dev 16:787-793.
17. Gómez E, Caamaño JN, Bermejo-Alvarez P, Díez C, Muñoz M, Martín D, Carrocera S, Gutiérrez-Adán A. 2009. Gene expression in early expanded parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized bovine blastocysts. J Reprod Dev 55:607-614.
18. Fukui Y, Kikuchi Y, Kondo H, Mizushima S. 2000. Fertilizability and developmental capacity of individuality culture bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 53:1553-1565.
19. Harvey AJ, Kind KL, Pantaleon M, Armstrong DT, Thompson JG. 2004. Oxygen-regulated gene expression in bovine blastocysts. Biol Reprod 71:1108-1119.
20. Hendriksen PJ, Vos PL, Steenweg WN, Bevers MM, Dieleman SJ. 2000. Bovine follicular development and its effect on the in vitro competence of oocytes. Theriogenology 53:11-20.
21. Holm P, Booth PJ, Schimidt MH, Greve T, Callesen H. 1999. High bovine blastocyst development in a static in vitro production system using SOFaa medium supplemented with sodium citrate and myo-inositol with or without serum proteins. Theriogenology 52:683-700.
22. Keller ML, Roberts AJ, Seidel GE Jr. 1998. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in the uterus and conceptus during early conceptus elongation in cattle. Biol Reprod 59:632-642.
23. Khurana NK, Niemann H. 2000. Effects of oocyte quality, oxygen tension, embryo density, cumulus cells and energy substrates on cleavage and morula/blastocyst formation of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 54:741-756.
24. Lane M, Gardner DK. 2007. Embryo culture medium: Which the best? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet 21:83-100.
25. Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T, Niemann H, Galli C. 2002. Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol Reprod 67:767-775.
26. Lonergan P, Rizos D, GutiérreZ-Adán A, Fair T, Boland MP. 2003. Oocyte and embryo quality: Effect of origin, culture conditions and gene expression patterns. Reprod Domest Anim 38:259-267.
27. Machado GM, Carvalho JO, Siqueira Filho E, Caixeta ES, Franco MM, Rumpf R, Dode MAN. 2009. Effect of Percoll volume, duration and force of centrifugation, on in vitro production and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 71:1289-1297.
28. Machado GM, Caixeta ES, Lucci CM, Rumpf R, Franco MM, Dode MAN. 2012. Post-hatching development of bovine embryos in vitro: The effects of tunnel preparation and gender. Zygote 20:123-134.
29. Machado GM, Ferreira AR, Guardieiro MM, Bastos MR, Carvalho JO, Lucci CM, Diesel TO, Sartori R, Rumpf R, Franco MM, Dode MAN. 2013. Morphology, sex ratio and gene expression of Day 14 in vivo and in vitro bovine embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 25:600-608.
30. Maddox-Hyttel P, Alexopoulos NI, Vajta G, Lewis I, Rogers P, Cann L, Callesen H, Nyborg P, Trounson A. 2003. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization of the initial post-hatching development of bovine embryos. Reproduction 125:607-623.
31. Mamo S, Mehta JP, McGettigan P, Fair T, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Lonergan P. 2011. RNA sequencing reveals novel gene clusters in bovine conceptus associated with maternal recognition of pregnancy and implantation. Biol Reprod 85:1143-1151.
32. Mansouri-Attia N, Sandra O, Aubertb J, Degrellea S, Evertsc RE, Giraud-Delvillea C, Heymana Y, Galio L, Huea I, Yang X, Tiane XC, Lewin HA, Renarda JP. 2009. Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies. PNAS 106:5687-5692.
33. Morton KM, Herrmann D, Sieg B, Struckmann C, Maxwell WMC, Raht D, Evans G, Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H, Wrenzycki C. 2007. Altered RNAm expression patterns in bovine blastocysts after fertilization in vitro using flow-cytometrically sex-sorted sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 74:931-940.
34. Mundim TCD, Ramos AF, Sartori R, Dode MAN, Melo EO, Gomes LFS, Rumpf R, Franco MM. 2009. Changes in gene expression profiles of bovine embryos produced in vitro, by natural ovulation, or hormonal superstimulation. Genet Mol Res 8:1398-1407.
35. Parrish JJ, Krogenaes A, Susko-Parrish JL. 1995. Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swim-up andPercoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development. Theriogenology 44:859-869.
36. Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2002-2007.
37. Pontes JHF, Nonato-Junior I, Sanches BV, Ereno-Junior JC, Uvo S, Barreiros TRR, Oliveira JA, Hasler JF, Seneda MM. 2009. Comparasion of embryo yield and pregnancy rate between in vivo and in vitro methods in the same Nelore (Bosindicus) donor cows. Theriolenology 71:690-697.
38. Pontes JHF, Sterza MFA, Basso AC, Ferreira CR, Sanches BV, Rubin KCP, Seneda MM. 2011. Ovum pick up, in vitro embryo production, and pregnancy rates from a large scale commercial program using Nelore cattle (Bosindicus) donors. Theriogenolgy 75:1640-1646.
39. Rizos D, Lonergan P, Boland MP, Arroyo-Gárcia R, Pintado B, Fuente J, Gutiérrez-Adán A. 2002. Analysis of differential messenger RNA expression between bovine blastocysts produced in different culture system: Implications for blastocysts quality. Biol Reprod 66:589-595.
40. Robertson I, Nelson RE. 1998. Certification and identification of the embryo. In: Stringfellow D, Seidel SM, editors. Savoy, IL USA: Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society. pp 103-134.
41. Rodríguez-Alvarez L, Sharbati J, Sharbati S, Cox JF, Einspanier R, Castro FO. 2010. Differential gene expression in bovine elongated (Day 17) embryos produced by somatic cell nucleus transfer and in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 74:45-59.
42. Talbot NC, Powell AM, Garrett W, Edwards JL, Rexroad CJR. 2000. Ultrastructural and karyotypic examination of in vitro produced bovine embryos developed in the sheep uterus. Tissue Cell 32:9-27.
43. Vandesompele J, Preter KD, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Roy NV, Paepe AD, Speleman F. 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genet Biol 3:1-11.
44. Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hytttel P. 2006. Post-hatching development of porcine and bovine embryo-Defining criteria for expected development in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 65:153-156.
45. Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Keskintepe L, Martins A Jr., Sirisathien S, Brackett B, Niemann H. 2001. Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in pre-implantation bovine embryos. Hum Reprod 16:893-901.