Suggestions from adolescents, young adults, and parents for improving informed consent in phase 1 pediatric oncology trials

Cancer

Volumn 119, Issue 23, 2013, Pages 4154-4161

  Baker, Justin N ^a   Leek, Angela C ^b   Salas, Halle Showalter ^c   Drotar, Dennis ^d   Noll, Robert ^e   Rheingold, Susan R ^f   Kodish, Eric D ^b  

^a ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^f CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescent; ethics; oncology; parent; pediatrics; phase 1; research; suggestion; young adult

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUGGESTION;

ADOLESCENT; ETHICS; ONCOLOGY; PARENT; PEDIATRICS; PHASE 1; RESEARCH; SUGGESTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE I AS TOPIC; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; NEOPLASMS; PARENTS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887995604     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28335     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C,. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982; 5: 319-329.
2. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, et al. Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effects on parents' understanding. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005; 159: 347-352.
3. Miller MJ,. Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2451-2453.
4. Wendler DS,. Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations. J Med Ethics. 2006; 32: 229-234.
5. Barfield RC, Church C,. Informed consent in pediatric clinical trials. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005; 17: 20-24.
6. Truong TH, Weeks JC, Cook EF, et al. Outcomes of informed consent among parents of children in cancer clinical trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011; 57: 998-1004.
7. Yap TY, Yamokoski AD, Hizlan S, et al. Informed consent for pediatric phase 1 cancer trials: physicians' perspectives. Cancer. 2010; 116: 3244-3250.
8. Read K, Fernandez CV, Gao J, et al. Decision-making by adolescents and parents of children with cancer regarding health research participation. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 959-965.
9. van Staa A, Jedeloo S, van der Stege H,; On Your Own Feet Research Group. "What we want": chronically ill adolescents' preferences and priorities for improving health care. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011; 5: 291-305.
10. Moore L, Kirk S,. A literature review of children's and young people's participation in decisions relating to health care. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19: 2215-2225.
11. Eggly S, Penner LA, Greene M, et al. Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: question asking by patients and their companions. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63: 2974-2985.
12. Foglia MB, Salas HS, Diekema DS,. A quality improvement approach to improving informed consent practices in pediatric research. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20: 343-352.
13. Yap TY, Yamokoski A, Noll R, Drotar D, Zyzanski S, Kodish ED,; Multi-site Intervention Study to Improve Consent Research Team. A physician-directed intervention: teaching and measuring better informed consent. Acad Med. 2009; 84: 1036-1042.
14. Miller VA, Baker JN, Leek AC, et al. Adolescent perspectives on phase I cancer research. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60: 873-878.
15. Cousino MK, Zyzanski SJ, Yamokoski AD, et al. Communicating and understanding the purpose of pediatric Phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 4367-4372.
16. Krippendorf K,. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications; 1980.
17. Hollingshead AB,. Two-Factor Index of Social Position. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 1957.
18. Hinds PS, Drew D, Oakes LL, et al. End-of-life care preferences of pediatric patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 9146-9154.
19. Maurer SH, Hinds PS, Spunt SL, et al. Decision making by parents of children with incurable cancer who opt for enrollment on a phase I trial compared with choosing a do not resuscitate/terminal care option. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3292-3298.
20. Levine D, Cohen K, Wendler D,. Shared medical decision-making: considering what options to present based on an ethical analysis of the treatment of brain tumors in very young children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012; 59: 216-220.
21. Tan GH, Totapally BR, Torbati D, et al. End-of-life decisions and palliative care in a children's hospital. J Palliat Med. 2006; 92: 332-342.
22. de Vries MC, Houtlosser M, Wit JM, et al. Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of physicians' experiences. BMC Med Ethics. 2011; 12: 18.
23. Kupst MJ, Patenaude AF, Walco GA, et al. Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003; 25: 787-790.
24. Hinds PS, Oakes L, Furman W, et al. End-of-life decision making by adolescents, parents, and healthcare providers in pediatric oncology: research to evidence-based practice guidelines. Cancer Nurs. 2001; 24: 122-134.