Quantitative determination of pulp and paper industry emissions and associated odor intensity in methyl mercaptan equivalent using electronic nose

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 82, Issue , 2014, Pages 401-409

  Deshmukh, Sharvari ^a,c   Jana, Arun ^b   Bhattacharyya, Nabarun ^b   Bandyopadhyay, Rajib ^c   Pandey, R A ^a  

^a NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b Center for Development and Advanced Computing   (India)

^c JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Electronic nose; Odor intensity; Principal component analysis; Reduced sulfur compounds; Response surface methodology; Singular value decomposition

Indexed keywords

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSORS; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

DATA ACQUISITION CARDS; ELECTRONIC NOSE; ODOR INTENSITY; PREDICTION CAPABILITY; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATIONS; REDUCED SULFUR COMPOUNDS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

ODORS;

BAGASSE; BUTANOL; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; METAL OXIDE; SULFUR DERIVATIVE; THIOL DERIVATIVE;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CORRELATION; DATA ACQUISITION; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; ODOR; POLLUTION MONITORING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SENSOR;

AIR SAMPLING; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ELECTRONIC NOSE; EXHAUST GAS; GAS ANALYSIS; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NITROGEN BALANCE; ODOR; PAPER INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULP MILL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; ODORS; SENSORS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84887971603     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.041     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bhattacharyya N., Seth S., Tudu B., Tamuly P., Ghosh D., Bandyopadhyay R., Bhuyan M. Monitoring of black tea fermentation process using electronic nose. J.Food Eng. 2007, 80:1146-1156.
2. Bockreis, Jager J. Odour monitoring by the combination of sensors and neural networks. Environ. Model. Softw. 1999, 14:421-426.
3. Bourgeois W., Romain A., Nicolas J., Stuetz R.M. The use of sensor arrays for environmental monitoring: interests and limitations. J.Environ. Monit. 2003, 5:852-860.
4. Delgado-Rodríguez M., Ruiz-Montoya M., Giraldez I., López R., Madejón E., Díaz M.J. Use of electronic nose and GC-MS in detection and monitoring some VOC. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 51:278-285.
5. Deshmukh S.C., Senthilnath J., Dixit R.M., Malik S.N., Pandey R.A., Vaidya A.N., Omkar S.N., Mudliar S.N. Comparison of radial basis function neural network and response surface methodology for predicting performance of biofilter treating toluene. J.Softw. Eng. Appl. 2012, 595-603.
6. Dong Ji-Zhou, DeBusk S.M. GC-MS analysis of hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, methanethiol, carbon disulfide, methyl thiocyanate and methyl disulfide in mainstream vapor phase cigarette smoke. Chromatographia 2010, 71.
7. Environment Agency Technical Guidance Note M13: Monitoring Hydrogen Sulphide and Total Reduced Sulphur in Atmospheric Releases and Ambient Air 2001, Environment Agency's National Compliance Assessment Service, England and Wales.
8. Francesco F.Di., Lazzerini B., Marcelloni F., Pioggia G. An electronic nose for odour annoyance assessment. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35:1225-1234.
9. Giri B.S., Mudliar S.N., Deshmukh S.C., Banerjee S., Pandey R.A. Treatment of waste gas containing low concentration of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in a bench-scale biofilter. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2185-2190.
10. Kasiri M.B., Aleboyeh H., Aleboyeh A. Modeling and optimization of heterogeneous photo-fenton process with response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:7970-7975.
11. McGinley C.M., McGinley M.A. Odor intensity scales for enforcement, monitoring, and testing. Air and Waste Management Association, Annual Conference 2000.
12. Pearce T.C., Schiffman S.S., Nagle H.T., Gardner J.W. Handbook of Machine Olfaction 2003, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
13. Polikar R., Jahan K., Healy B. Acombined pattern separability and two-tiered classification approach for identification of binary mixtures of VOCs. Sens. Actuators, B 2006, 116:174-182.
14. Romain A.C., Nicolas J. Long term stability of metal oxide-based gas sensors for e-nose environmental applications: an overview. Sens. Actuators, B 2010, 146:502-506.
15. Schlegelmilch M., Streese J., Stegmann R. Odour management and treatment technologies: an overview. Waste Manage. 2005, 25:928-939.
16. Szczurek A., Maciejewwska M. Relationship between odour intensity assessed human assessor and TGS sensor array response. Sens. Actuators, B 2005, 106:13-19.
17. Toda K., Obata T., Obolkin V.A., Potemkin V.l., Hirota K., Takeuchi M., Arita S., Khodzher T.,V., Grachev M.,A. Atmospheric methanethiol emitted from pulp and paper plant on the shore of Lake Baikal. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44:2427-2433.
18. Xu C.N., Miura N., Ishida Y., Matuda K., Yamazoe N. Selective detection of NH over NO in combustion exhausts by using Au and MoO3 doubly promoted WO element. Sens. Actuators, B 2000, 65:163-165.
19. Yu H., Wang J. Discrimination of Longjing green-tea grade by electronic nose. Sens. Actuators, B 2007, 122:134-140.