A critique of experimental phylogenetics

Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 678-688

  Oakley, Todd H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887968977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:895-909.
2. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 57:717-745.
3. Bull, J. J., C. W. Cunningham, I. J. Molineux, M. R. Badgett, and D. M. Hillis. 1993. Experimental molecular evolution of bacteriophage T7. Evolution 47:993-1007.
4. Cleland, C. 2001. Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology 29:987-990.
5. Conway Morris, S. 2003. Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cunningham, C. W., K. Jeng, J. Husti, M. Badgett, I. J. Molineux, D. M. Hillis, and J. J. Bull. 1997. Parallel molecular evolution of deletions and nonsense mutations in bateriophage T7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:113-116.
7. Cunningham, C. W., H. Zhu, and D. M. Hillis. 1998. Best-fit maximum likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: Empirical tests with known phylogenies. Evolution 52:978-987.
8. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: Murray.
9. Efron, B. 1985. Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems. Biometrika 72:45-58.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
11. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: Inferences and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics 22:521-565.
12. Garland, T., Jr., A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. Journal of Experimental Biology 208:3015-3035.
13. Gee, H. 1999. In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life. New York: Free Press.
14. Grant, T. 2002. Testing methods: The evaluation of discovery operations in evolutionary biology. Cladistics 18:94-111.
15. Hillis, D. M. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 44:3-16.
16. Hillis, D. M., J. J. Bull, M. E. White, M. R. Badgett, and I. J. Molineux. 1993. Experimental approaches to phylogenetic analysis. Evolution 42:90-92.
17. Hillis, D. M., J. J. Bull, M. E. White, M. R. Badgett, and I. J. Molineux. 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: Generation of a known phylogeny. Science 255:589-592.
18. Lee, C., A. O. Mooers, S. Blay, A. Singh, and T. H. Oakley. 2006. CoMET: A mesquite package for comparison of continuous models of character evolution on phylogenies. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2:193-196.
19. Lee, Y., and J. Yin. 1996. Detection of evolving viruses. Nature Biotechnology 14:491-493.
20. Mooers, A. Ø., and D. Schluter. 1998. Fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenies: An example using vertebrate body sizes. Contributions to Zoology 68:3-18.
21. Mooers, A. Ø., S. M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 1999. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). American Naturalist 154:249-259.
22. Nilsson, D. E., and S. Pelger. 1994. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 256:53-58.
23. Oakley, T. H., and C. W. Cunningham. 2000. Independent contrasts succeed where ancestor reconstruction fails in a known bacteriophage phylogeny. Evolution 54:397-405.
24. Oakley, T. H., Z. Gu, E. Abouheif, N. H. Patel, and W. H. Li. 2005. Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: An example using yeast functional genomic data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22:40-50.
25. Posada, D., and T. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53:793-808.
26. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Systematic Biology 50:580-601.
27. Salvini-Plawen, L. V., and E. Mayr. 1977. On the Evolution of Photoreceptors and Eyes. Evolutionary Biology, vol. 10. New York: Plenum.
28. Sanson, G. F., S. Y. Kawashita, A. Brunstein, and M. R. Briones. 2002. Experimental phylogeny of neutrally evolving DNA sequences generated by a bifurcate series of nested polymerase chain reactions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:170-178.
29. Skell, P. S. 2005. Evolutionary theory contributes little to experimental biology. The Scientist 19:10.
30. Sober, E. 1993. Experimental tests of phylogenetic inference methods. Systematic Biology 42:85-89.
31. Sober, E. 2007. What is wrong with intelligent design? Quarterly Review of Biology 82:3-8.
32. Sober, E., and M. Steel. 2002. Testing the hypothesis of common ancestry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 218:395-408.
33. Vartanian, J. P., M. Henry, and S. Wain-Hobson. 2001. Simulating pseudogene evolution in vitro: Determining the true number of mutations in a lineage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:13172-13176.
34. Webster, A. J., and A. Purvis. 2002. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 269:143-149.